logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: Annoyed-by-in-2013
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2014-01-02 12:29
"It left me apoplectic with rage" - Netherworld by Lisa Morton
Netherworld - Lisa Morton

[This book was provided to me for no monies via the Early Reviewers program at LibraryThing]

 

 

I don't read many terrible books. I read a good few which are just not very good, but it's quite rare for me to read one which is deeply and unfixable awful. Nor do I read many which are so bad they're good - I have too much to read, not enough time, and too little disposable income as it is.

 

The best I can say about Netherworld is that it is, at times, entertainingly stupid - "Why is this the Cave of Cats?" wonders one character; 10 seconds later he finds a lot of cats. Unfortunately, it's not entertaining enough to get me past the the factual inaccuracies - as I said in my status update, the language of Kolkata is Bengali, not Hindi; yes, it is spoken there today and yes, a Kolkata had a Hindi language newspaper at the time, but the guy carrying the chair, talking to his mates, is going to speak his own language - and general lack of historical world building which, when combined with other aspects of the book, feels more like ignorance.

 

I appreciate the oddness in giving out about factual accuracy in a book about a woman trying to close supernatural gates to the Netherworld, but this is set in 1880 and I expected it to reflect that. Instead we have American language - references to wait staff etc - and a heroine, Lady Diana Furnaval, who reads nothing like the product of a 19th Century upbringing, let alone one - we must assume because the book doesn't tell us - from the upper classes. For a start, she doesn't appear to have a ladies maid, which I might buy if there was a reason for it, or the text referred to her doing any of the things a ladies maid does. It doesn't. It's just one of the many contextual gaps which undermine this book. Don't get me started on the trip to the Bad part of London. 

 

The language, too, is a disappointment. It adequately describes what is happening, with rather too many dramatic em dashes for my taste (one particularly grated: there is a diary section whose writer is attempting to get down the information as quickly as possible but still uses a dramatic em dash line break to enthral the reader). It does not, however, give any atmosphere, or sense of place. Details are absent, but for me, details are what make a book like this. We don't even know what title Diana's husband possessed, or who has it now, or whether they're bothered that Diana is living in their house.

 

The plot is not terrible, but it does take a while for it to kick in. Before that it's a bit directionless with Diana travelling around closing the gateways to the Netherworld, taking in Romania (in a Dracula homage), China, India, and the US, before discovering the dastardly plot. It's not a very good plot and the attempts to stop Diana thwarting it are remarkably inefficient. Even the Big Bad Guy comes directly from the Bond Villain school of "Well, you're going to die anyway, so sure I'll answer your questions about my nefarious schemes". 

 

Irritable mentions must go to Mina, a cat version of Dean Koontz's Exceptional Dog. As a woman 15 years and 23 cats away from becoming a fully fledged crazy cat lady, I find these depictions incredibly annoying. If you are feeding a cat nothing but protein and carrying it around in a bag all day, you are going to have a deeply unwell cat. Yes, it really does annoy me that much. 

 

Also to the dull and repetitive kissing scenes - have your 80's Mills and Boon bingo cards at the ready - and the angry making (trigger warning for this) 

 

attempted rape by an Incubus who intends to impregnate Diana and have her die in childbirth. No word on whether the kidder was to be called Adrian.

(spoiler show)

 

 

 

My special prize for stupidest thing in the entire book is reserved for a sentence near the end. Diana has been shown the future of manufacturing and is a tad upset by it because children have no limbs, or something. She sets up a grant for scientists who create better, cleaner, safer methods of industry. Aside from the fact it's a waste of money because engineers are the people you want for that type of thing, Diana's estate is in Derbyshire. You know what's in Derbyshire? Apart from Pemberly (home of Jane Austen's Mr Darcy). Cotton Mills. Lots and lots and lots of dark satanic mills, noted employers of children. For somebody with such hippy Guardian-reading liberal sensibilities, Lady Diana is remarkably unaware of what's happening on her doorstep, or throughout her country. Has she never read any Mrs Gaskell? Or even a newspaper? 1880 was the year compulsory education was introduced for heaven's sake. 

 

I judge a book in part by how well it manages what I expect from it. A book with "Bram Stoker award winning writer" (for Non-Fiction, incidentally) plastered on the front was expected to be well written and well researched. This was neither. I'll give it 1 star because I did finish it, but I'm struggling to think who, among the people who aren't me, would enjoy it. 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2014-01-01 10:57
Well, since everybody else is doing it ... : 2013 wrap-up

This post is a lie. For a start, my reading year runs from Christmas day because I'm fairly likely to be able to get a good start on it, and a good start on it means I'm more likely to meet my reading goal of 100 books, something I've never managed.

 

That, too, is a lie. 

 

I don't count my books conventionally. Books shorter than 175 ish pages count as half a book, books longer than 500 pages count as 2 books; "hard" books approaching this page limit may count as 2 (stuff like Bring Up The Bodies), "easy" books or re-reads approaching this limit may not. The page count attained in abandoned books is added up and divided by 250 to the nearest whole number. 

 

In 2013, I read 96 and a half books - or 91 books if you want to count them individually. Which is not too shabby, especially considering the disaster which happened over the summer and rendered me unable to concentrate on anything for the best part of 3 weeks. Due to that, this year has contained a lot of re-reads.

 

I abandoned only 5 books this year - a book only counts as abandoned if I've read more than 80 pages - so it's hard to make a significant comment about why I stop reading, but reflecting on the books I've finished but not enjoyed (as well as a couple I've loved), the blurb is usually to blame. 

 

So, in a completely unscientific, highly subjective way, here's a roundup.

 

The Best/Most Interesting books of the year:

 

 

 

These are the books which stand out to me when I look back over my list. It's a bit predictable, but I've gone for Sharp Objects by Gillian Flynn because I haven't yet read Gone Girl (It's been on my Kindle since the summer), because it was the first of her books I read so it had a freshness to it Dark Places (also highly recommended) didn't. Also, because I'm a former self-harmer. When I look back on this year, it is with forced pride that I didn't fall off the wagon, although I came breathtakingly close on a couple of occasions. The Uncommon Reader is a very short and funny novella about her majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, discovering a mobile library behind Buckingham Palace. If you are on this site, you need to read that book.

 

Most Annoying/Disappointing books of the Year

 

 


I judge a book according to the blurb because I think that's fair. These are subjective views, not objective, and these are the books which have actively annoyed me, either from having deathly stupid plotting (Elijah's Mermaid), everybody saying it was great when actually it wasn't (The Night Circus), being self-indulgent nonsense (How Should a Person Be?), having the stupidest conclusion ever that doesn't stand up to scrutiny (Mr Penumbra's 24 hour Bookstore), having a punchline which doesn't work (Habits of The House), being offensive to me as a woman (The Revised Fundamentals of Caregiving), reading as though it was written to satisfy demand (Every Seventh Wave), or being filled with factual errors (Netherworld). There are plenty more which just weren't very good, but these are the ones I could happily rant to you about. 

 

Books I liked nobody else appears to have read

 Funny, and (emotionally) true. Also, my Mammy enjoyed it.

 

 

 Stupid cover, stupid blurb, but underneath a really good Book Club worthy story. 

 

 Again, a stupid blurb which fails to mention the MC is intersex. The second book is stronger than the first (which is a bit plotless, but makes up for it at the end), but I'd recommend reading them in order.

 

 

 

So there you go. Roll on 2014. I'm already behind with my reviews.

 

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?