logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: The-Dispatcher
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2019-08-23 06:03
Review: The Dispatcher
The Dispatcher - John Scalzi,Zachary Quinto

This was an odd one, but not in a bad way.  Zachary Quinto narrated this (almost) chilling tale about death by murder not being permanent.  Somehow someone stumbled upon this fact.  Death by suicide, accident,  natural causes are normal deaths.  If a person is murdered, 99% of the time their murdered body disintegrates and they materialize in the place they are safest/happiest, e.g. home.

 

So of course with this new twist on death there comes a revenue stream and a new occupation.  Dispatchers are basically licensed murderers.   They work with the government and insurance companies.  Dispatching a person who is in a surgery gone wrong saves the hospital and insurance company tons of money because the person is "dispatched" by a appointed  dispatcher and they materialize back at home (in most cases) in the state they were in some hours prior to surgery.  They still need the surgery, but now they have the added bonus of knowing what went wrong the first time and not making the same mistake twice.

 

So of course there is a private sector for rich people.  And of course there always the chance of something going wrong, which happens in this tale.  A dispatch goes wrong and then the dispatcher mysteriously goes missing.  Now it's up to a fellow dispatcher and police officer to find out what happened and save the missing person before they die for real.

 

This was hella creepy and Quinto did a good job telling Scalzi's story.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2018-08-11 22:53
The Dispatcher (audiobook) by John Scalzi, narrated by Zachary Quinto
The Dispatcher - John Scalzi,Zachary Quinto

In the world of this story, something happened 8+ years ago that changed how death works. When someone is killed (or murdered?) by another person, instead of staying dead they pop out of existence and reappear, naked and alive, in their own home, wherever in the world that happens to be. Well, most of the time. There's a one in a thousand chance that they'll stay dead.

No one knows how this change came to be, or why, but it has resulted in the creation of a new job, Dispatcher. Dispatchers are people trained and licensed to kill people who are about to die, so that they can come back to life. Tony Valdez is a Dispatcher substituting for another Dispatcher at a hospital. It seems like a normal enough assignment until he's roped into an investigation into the disappearance of the Dispatcher he was substituting for.

This was okay. The setup was really interesting, but I had trouble getting a handle on the conditions under which someone would come back to life. I initially thought that their death required the direct and immediate involvement of another human being. However, that would have meant that there was nothing for anybody to worry about in the part where a woman was hit by a truck. Another human being was driving the truck that hit her, so she should have died and then reappeared in her own home.

Near the end of the story, other details were provided that seemed to indicate that intention played a role. Since the driver hadn't intended to kill the woman, she would simply have died. I assume this means that if someone had intentionally poisoned someone, their victim would have come back to life, but if they had accidentally poisoned the person, their victim would simply have died. I'm not sure even that quite fits, however. Wouldn't it mean that Dispatchers' victims would almost never come back to life? Valdez didn't consider what he did to be murder. He was providing a service that was almost guaranteed to save people's lives. Since he didn't kill people with the intention of them staying dead, shouldn't they all have, well, stayed dead? Unless he was lying when he was describing how he viewed his work - quite possible, considering how many other things he lied about or failed to immediately mention.

I have a feeling I'm probably overthinking this, but I couldn't help trying to tease apart the details of how all of this worked, since the details turned out to be very important at several points in the story. One of those instances in particular made it difficult to believe that 1) Valdez had been doing this job for 8 years and 2) that he'd had a great deal of experience with the shadier aspects of Dispatcher work. It shouldn't have taken him as long as it did to figure out how a couple hired thugs were going to make use of one aspect of the whole "killing you, but not really" thing.

The resolution to the mystery of the missing Dispatcher was very emotional, but something about the way the story was written resulted in it having less impact that it should have. Maybe the problem was that so much of the story involved Valdez (and occasionally the cop) visiting people and asking questions. The emotional resolution was mostly pieced together second- or third-hand by Valdez - none of it happened on-page. Heck, even the missing Dispatcher never had an on-page appearance.

All in all, this wasn't bad but could have been better. On the plus side, Zachary Quinto's narration was excellent. I've listened to The Dispatcher twice now, and Quinto was a large part of the reason why.

 

(Original review posted on A Library Girl's Familiar Diversions.)

Like Reblog Comment
text 2018-08-06 23:55
Reading progress update: I've listened 107 out of 139 minutes.
The Dispatcher - John Scalzi,Zachary Quinto

Valdez is really slow on the uptake right now. I mean, this is a thing he does for a living - he should know the rules better than anyone. You can't tell me no one has ever used the whole "killing you but not really" thing this way before.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2018-08-06 22:02
Reading progress update: I've listened 60 out of 139 minutes.
The Dispatcher - John Scalzi,Zachary Quinto

"'You stabbed the fucking judge?'

'Look, dude, it's against the rules to sto-'

'The judge did something you thought was against the rules so you fucking stabbed him?' Mason roared. 'You think that was appropriate?'

'Dude,' the duelist said and then screamed as Mason shoved his own sword into his chest.

'Oh, I'm sorry, was that against the rules?' Mason asked and yanked the sword out."

 

Heh. Although I really don't see the appeal of these duels. I mean, yes, you'll end up safe and sound in your home after it's all done (unless you're one of the very unlucky few who stay dead), but first you have to deal with the pain. And these guys suck with swords, so it'll probably be particularly awful until someone finally hits an artery or something.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2018-08-06 21:28
Reading progress update: I've listened 46 out of 139 minutes.
The Dispatcher - John Scalzi,Zachary Quinto

This is set in a universe where people who are killed by other people have a very high chance of turning up, naked and alive, in their own home seconds later. One of the characters just mentioned dog fights, and now I'm wondering more about how this all works. Are animals affected too? If one dog kills another dog, does the dead dog turn up in whatever place it considers to be its home? Or are humans special in some way and, if so, why?

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?