obviously this is a re-read for me...and how wonderful it is to revisit the first 11 issues of Vigilante without digging out the original comics I have stashed away! Vig got graphic-noveled; I'm still stunned that they bothered, but hopefully he'll find a new audience. I'm the old audience, going back yet again. this first chapter in the career of Vigilante is about as normal as things ever were. so hopefully there'll be more Volumes, for when things really get out of control.
the structure of this novel has me wondering how they dealt with the material when they made the film version. maybe I'll have to see it. hm. as far as what the book offers, it's a "novel within a novel" approach, and as a reader fully hooked, I congratulate the author on making me feel so much for Tony and his family, even though I know they are a fiction within a fiction. then there's Susan--what's her deal? and why has Edward shoved his creepy book into her life? I'm really enjoying the layers...great read so far.
Disclaimer: ARC via Netgalley.
I live in a neighborhood that has anarchists. Granted, my philosophy is different, and I don’t quite understand why an anarchist would always have the most up to date computer, but hey, they seem pretty nice even if they smell of pot much of the time.
That’s my view of anarchists, who are usually squatters in my neck of the woods.
Needless to say, those types of Anarchists are not the ones that Merriman is writing about. Merriman’s history is about the bandits that committed crimes during pre-WWI France, but it is also about the anarchist movement in France at the time.
Merriman opens his book with the holdup of the Société Générale. This is the Bonnot Gang. Of course, like most criminal’s people who were not involved with the crime spree where caught in the net. It is two of these – Victor Kibaltchiche and Riette Maitrejean.
Merriman takes him time in laying the foundation for the action. He provides more detail of the Belle Époque period, showing the trends and political movements that gave rise to the Anarchist movement as well as the various threads of that movement – illegal activity vs philosophy.
For that is what sometimes gets lost in a discussion of anarchists, at least in the media. They become simply bomb throwing, gun shooting radicals who populate the media. Merriman’s book illustrates that in some cases it was a life style, including vegetarianism and foregoing of items such alcohol and salt.
Maitrejean and Kibaltchiche are at the heart of the story, for they seemed to have known everyone, and part of the drama of the story is the dragnet that captures are in its wake, regardless of involvement or not. It is their fate and the fate of their family that moves the story forward. Merriman’s prose is invigorating enough to carry the reader along. There are also little details, such as the horror of balsamic vinegar that actually illustrate the dedication to the cause. Honesty, you must strongly believe in something if you are willing to give up such a wonderful thing. Such small details actually make the history more interesting and in some ways more real.
Considering the current political climate, the book might be timelier than intended. It is also to Merriman’s credit that he does not romanticize the Illegalistes. Despite the title the book isn’t one of the romantic retellings of an outlaw life. In many ways, while the reader does end up feeing some sympathy for the bandits, or at least a few of them, the cost to others not involved in the Illegalistes is not ignored. This is done by the not only the use of outsiders but also by showcasing the debates within the movement itself.