Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: deeper-into-you
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2017-11-07 17:46
Incompleteness: “Build Deeper - Deep Learning Beginner's Guide by Thimira Amaratunga
Build Deeper: Deep Learning Beginners' Guide - Thimira Amaratunga


“epsilon”: 1e-07,

“float”: “float32”,


“backend”: “tensorflow”



In “Build Deeper - Deep Learning Beginner's Guide by Thimira Amaratunga


This book confirms other predictive system results that I have seen, where it has often been found that we human as a species who fancy ourselves as psychics or using other la-di-da methodologies can at best achieve around an 80% accuracy rate, even with good regular practice and tuning. The more accustomed you are toward reaching ever higher accuracy & precision percentile targets the more the distance to the next little increase in goal horizon. Still it does bring into question the abilities of Science and machine systems designing new machine systems, often through excluding what are regarded as unrepeatable subjective methods in favour of repeatable objectiveness. Outliers and other non-obvious patterns & so on are pushing back the boundaries at the edge of our cultural belief systems.


I don't think that any computer scientist would dispute the point that modern AI or machine learning is nowhere near the threshold of 'consciousness' or even 'general intelligence'. But it's not uncommon for words to have a different meaning within a technical field compared to how they are used in everyday communication. In regular English 'chaos' means unpredictable, whereas in mathematics it refers to the tendency of sensitive nonlinear systems to exhibit emergent attraction basins that can potentially be extremely predictable. Those are arguably even antonyms. Another example would be terms 'deterministic/nondeterministic' in Computer Science, which also differ strongly from their meanings in regular English. The point is that if you feel the need to grandstand on these trivialities, you clearly don't understand the fundamentals of the subject matter under discussion.



If you're into Computer Science and Machine Learning in particular, read on.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2017-10-12 22:06
Dipping Into Sin 2: Dipping Deeper Into ... Dipping Into Sin 2: Dipping Deeper Into Sin - DJ Parker


That Epilogue!!!! You can't leave me hanging like this D.J. Parker! NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

I'm Dead... I don't know whether to wind my butt or scratch my watch.

This was a great follow up to book 1 in this series. But my heart is hurting right now. I'm scared to find out what that Epilogue is leading to. Maybe when I grow some stronger female balls I'll dive into book 3. But for now I kinda got to step away for a bit. But... Just.. WOW!!!

Based on books 1 and 2, I would definitely recommend this series.

Happy #DangerousSexyIntenseReading ;D

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2017-09-21 21:29
Not Very Good First Book in Oak Knoll Series
Deeper Than the Dead (Oak Knoll) - Tami Hoag

If I had read this book first in the series, I would have never read books #2 and #3. Everyone (except for three out of the four kids) was terrible. Every adult was the worst ever. I felt like there were just too many characters for you to really focus on. I think if Hoag had either stuck with the lead detective to tell her story, or switched between him and the FBI profiler, it would have worked better. Instead we had at least 10 or more POVs I think. And we had the serial killer plot-line, the sociopath kid plot-line, the teacher and FBI agent falling in love, the detective trying to run his case, the one kid dealing with his terrible mother and absent father, another kid dealing with her parents, etc. Nothing hung together very well IMHO.


I can't tell you much about the characters besides what I said above. I liked the characters of Wendy and Tommy the best. Everyone else was awful.

The writing was not typical Hoag either. I feel like she was mimicking 1980s thriller/books back in the day which is the only way I can try to grasp why there was a lot of misogyny in this book. I just felt turned off by the two male leads, such as they were for this book.


The flow was pretty bad though. I think the main reason was that we had so many POVs and you found yourself (or excuse me, I found myself) getting impatient to get to who the serial killer was and the rest of the book felt like background noise. I get why Haog did it though, she follows up on two plot lines from this book (Wendy and her parents along with the pre-teen boy who is a bully and abusive) in book #2. 


I will say that though the setting is the 1980s and Hoag makes a big deal about not relying on DNA evidence, this book was pretty weak. We don't get to see how not having DNA hampers the case at all. The town brings in the FBI to profile the serial killer. He is able to put together a pretty good profile of the killer. I really did want to see more issues like the Kinsey Milhone series does with her having to go and read microfiche, she had to go and interview a ton of suspects, her having to do a lot of nitty gritty work. This whole book was the cops going around and acting like jackasses for the most part to suspects, suspects wives and to kids at some points in the book.


The ending was a miss for me. I don't know what big takeway I was supposed to get, but unless Hoag has another book in the series I don't see what the payoff would be. 



Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2017-09-21 14:20
Reading progress update: I've read 100%.
Deeper Than the Dead (Oak Knoll) - Tami Hoag

I ended up only liking two characters (Wendy and Tommy) both kids. The adults in this book were terrible, and one of the kids was a sociopath. I don't think the book hung together very well and the ending was weird. 


I know that I read these books backwards (I started with book #3 and then read book #2 this year) but besides the books taking place in the 1980s they are nothing to write home about.

The sexism and misogyny at play with a lot of the characters was surprising. There was a stereotypical gay best friend that had me cringing inside. Also, I don't think this character (Frannie) even shows up in the second book.


At one point Detective Mendez asks if one of the victims is involved in risky behavior. Apparently going to bars = risky behavior.


I can't even get all hot and bothered about this though cause the book was boring. It was a lot of going back and forth and the FBI profiler (Vince) being a horn dog to the school teacher (Anne). And I am still baffled she was even interested in him. And we had Vince acting inappropriately towards one woman who dared to be mean to Anne. It was just gross. There's a line about him being primeval in that moment and wanting to protect his mate and I just rolled my eyes.  


Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2017-09-21 02:33
Reading progress update: I've read 45%.
Deeper Than the Dead (Oak Knoll) - Tami Hoag

What is happening in this book right now??


“She’s got spunk, sticking up for her kids. I like that,” he said. 

He looked at Mendez out the corner of his eye. “Have you asked her out?” 

Mendez startled at the question. “What? No! I’m in the middle of a case.” 

Vince shrugged. “A guy’s gotta eat.”

“I just met her yesterday.”

“So? I just met her an hour ago.” Mendez stared at him.

“You asked her out? She’s young enough to be your daughter!”

“Yeah,” he said, grinning. “But she isn’t.”

“I can’t believe you asked her out! In the middle of all of that, you asked her out.”


Ughhhhhhhhh! Women are being kidnapped, tortured, and murdered but yeah let's ask someone out in an inappropriate manner. Lord.


More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?