Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: oxford-university
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2017-05-03 21:33
The Devil's Hunt
The Devil's Hunt - Paul Doherty

A Medieval Mystery featuring Hugh Corbett


England, 1303


Ascham opened his eyes. the library was dark. He tried again to scream but the sound died on his lips. The candle, flickering under its metal cap on the table, shed a small pool of light and Ascham glimpsed the piece of parchment the assassin had tossed onto the table. Ascham realised what had brought about his death: he'd recognised the truth but he'd been stupid ebough to allow his searches to be known. If only he had a pen! His hand grasped the wound bubbling in his chest. He wept and crawled painfully across the floor towards the table. He seized the parchment and, with his dying strength, carefully hauled himself up to etch out the letters – but the pool of light seemed to be dimming. He'd lost the feeling in his legs, which were stiffening, like bars of iron.
'Enough,' he whispered. 'Ah, Jesus ...'
Ascham closed his eyes, coughed and died as the blood bubbled on his lips.


When the book opens, Hugh Corbett is at home in Leighton, in Essex, enjoying his peaceful life as Lord of the Manor, even if that does involve the odd hanging (as on the first page of Chapter 1) which he certainly does not enjoy, though everyone else seems to. But this country idyll is rudely shattered when the King, Edward I, arrives at the manor house demanding that Hugh return to his service immediately.


A demand from a king, though phrased as a request, is in reality an order, and in the case of this king, to cross him when he is in this mood would be to invite disaster. So Sir Hugh, along with his henchman Ranulf-atte-Newgate and their friend-servant-squire Maltote, are despatched to Oxford, where Sparrow Hall is in a state of turmoil. Two murders have already been committed there. Left near the second corpse was a parchment announcing "The Bellman fears neither King nor clerk [...] The Bellman will ring the truth and all shall hear it."


Meanwhile, outside the college, in the city, this Bellman has been posting proclamations attacking the King and claiming that Simon de Montfort was in the right of it when he took up arms against the King. And these proclamations purport to be emanating from Sparrow Hall, which the masters there all fervently deny. Well, they would.


Also outside the Hall, another seemingly separate series of murders has been taking place. In each case, an old beggar from the city, by definition helpless and defenceless, has been taken out into the forest and decapitated and his head has been hung from the branches of a tree. Sir Hugh finds reason to believe they were not actually killed in the forest but taken there – from Sparrow Hall, which would link them in some strange way with the Bellman and the murder of the two masters.


Another perfect medieval whodunnit from Paul Doherty. Not a word is wasted, and the excitement never flags for a moment. Nor can one possibly guess (without cheating!) who the Bellman really is.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2014-08-12 20:15
BookaDay - Day 12
The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary: Volumes I and II, Slipcased with Reading Glass - Oxford University Press

Most Practical Book


Very practical if you are studying for the Scripps Spelling Bee -- which i did when I was about, oh, 11.   But then again, I just have a thing for dictionaries.

Like Reblog Comment
review 2014-03-05 12:35
An Outline of the Imperial Age
The Roman Empire.: (Oxford Paperbacks University Series, Opus 30) - M.P. (Martin Percival Charlesworth

It is funny that I picked up this book a couple of weeks after I had finished reading a book outlining the Roman Republic, and what was even stranger was all along I thought it was a Biggles book (not as I was reading it mind you). As it turned out, it effectively continued on from where the previous book on the Roman Republic had finished (not that this the two books were a part of a series, rather it just happened that when I bought them they ended up being complimentary).



I am actually inclined to think that the first three centuries of the Roman empire is probably the best part to look at because it was during this period that the empire was at its height, though one could suggest that the barbarian invasions between 240 and 270 AD was effectively the beginning of the end. However, after the barbarians were eventually defeated, and peace was restored to the empire, the empire still had a couple of centuries to run before the complete collapse of the West and the gradual decline of the East.


However there were some significant changes after the barbarian invasions that suggested that classical Rome, and in particular the classical world, was coming to an end. Robin Lane Fox, in The Classical World: An Epic History from Homer to Hadrian believes that the end of the classic period was the Emperor Hadrian, and in a way he is probably correct because after Hardrian there was nothing really all that new coming out of the empire in the way of art, architecture, science, or even literature. Mind you, on the literary front, we can't forget the huge amount of coming from the Christians (much of which is preserved) but when it comes to the pagan authors there is actually very little. It seemed that as we enter the 2nd and 3rd centuries, people are too busy looking back at what had gone and not too concerned with looking forward. Also, they were in a time of unprecedented peace, that was pierced by only one year of civil war, and without conflict people ended up becoming fat on their indulgences. In many cases it is much like the United States of today, where the heartland is relatively free from enemy invasion, and has been for over two hundred years.


As for the end of the third century, the empire had changed dramatically. The administration of the empire had moved out of Rome, and with Constantine's victory over his rivals, the capital was moved east to the city of Byzantium (to be renamed Constantinople, and later Istanbul), and Rome simply became a symbol of a bygone age. Further, Constantine had allowed Christians to openly worship, and was also said to be Christian himself (though that is still debatable, and my position is that a monotheistic religion made it better for stability than a polytheistic religion, and I will leave my criticisms of Eusebius for a later time). With the acceptance of Christianity within the empire, and with it soon becoming the state religion, the old empire was gone forever (though there were the occasional apostate emperors who ascended the throne, but generally, after Constantine, most of them were Christian).


As for this book, I got the distinct impression, at least at the end, that the author was Christian. Okay, I certainly agree with his position that we cannot criticise Rome using twenty-first century values, but I also noticed that by the end of the book he seemed to be cheerleading Christianity and praising Constantine's reforms, to the point that he was arguing in favour of the first Christian emperor. Mind you, he was also very much cheerleading Rome, but then again, I tend to do the same thing when it comes to Classical Athens.


Source: www.goodreads.com/review/show/867397215
Like Reblog Comment
review 2010-07-07 00:00
Oxford-Paravia Italian Dictionary (English and Italian Edition)
Oxford-Paravia Italian Dictionary - Oxford University Press Just ordered it -- so I'll have to see...
More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?