This 1973 book was groundbreaking for its time but badly needs updating and a better grouning. It could be seen as a collection of dirty stories, yes, but it also does give insight into the female psyche and I wonder how much would still apply today. Part of the problem is I feel this isn't very gro...
An interesting view of feminism from, not quite my generation, but a half-step or step before. Looks at some of the issues that are still haunting society. With definitions for women we've left men without roles, these questions are going to have to be answered to heal society.
Perhaps a Freudian would give you good reasons I hated this book, I dunno. But it struck me as all surface.
Not for the prudish or the squeamish. And guys, just because we think about outlandish things, doesn't mean that we want to do them.
This is nothing less than an anthology of sexual baggage and my hat is off to the men who wrote in with such honesty and courage.Friday mentions in the introduction that she has digested sexual taboos from women as empowering and progressive but when faced with the same taboos in men's fantasies she...
This was read ages ago when I want to "research" on female sexual fantasies, with an purely academic intention and all.Not!I forgot a lot about the content already, but I remembered that some women fantasy for being raped because that take away the guilt for liking sex. It is a social science book w...
[These notes were made in 1981:]. Naturally enough, I bought this out of prurient interest. And it is more or less what I expected - longish accounts of various types of erotic fantasy, linked with a facile tho' not by any means illiterate or vulgar commentary. It's printed on cheap paper, has a f...
Log in with Facebook 
