I won a copy of this book from BookRiot.

This is a great book for comic and graphic novel lovers. Consisting of thirteen interviews and presented in question-answer format, this book gives some insight into creating graphic novels.

Each graphic novelist also created a short comic for the book around a central theme. I loved seeing all of the different styles of art included in the book.

The only real drawback for me with this book was that the question-answer format was a little boring to read at times. The interviews were interesting, but I found it best to read an interview, take a break, then read another one. Otherwise, they all kind of blended together.

One thing that really resonated with me personally was how many of the artists discussed feeling pigeonholed into superhero comics. They recalled how freeing it was to discover that an artist can create whatever they want with their art. I have always been fascinated with comics and graphic novels, but don't really like the style and representation of superhero comics and I am so thankful that there are so many more options now. Comics are so diverse today, in part, because of the hard work of some of the graphic novelists featured in this book. I loved the emphasis on being yourself and doing what is meaningful to you.

Overall, a good read. I recommend to people who enjoy reading or creating comics and graphic novels.

From the interview to James Marshall.

Margaret Wise Brown, awakened by the moon by Leonard S.  Marcus
Story about Margaret, her life, her relatives and what interests they had while she grew up.
Different places she visited and lived and books they read and games they played.
Moves onto her adult life also and her book writing. Like stories she's written and the way she uses furry animals.
Loved hearing of her island house and all the struggles with her books, makes you appreciate them a lot more.
 

Overall Recommendation:

Essential reading for anyone interested in working with children’s books—writers, editors, publishers, librarians, and so on. I expect that others may not find it to be of too much interest (unfortunately for them).

What made me pick it up?

Recommended to me as essential reading by someone who works in children’s publishing.

What is there to like?

• A large part of the reading pleasure is that it is something of a star parade for classic children’s literature. Ursula Nordstrom seemingly worked with pretty much everyone you read as a kid: Laura Ingalls Wilder, Margaret Wise Brown (Goodnight Moon and Runaway Bunny), Crockett Johnson (Harold and the Purple Crayon), Maurice Sendak, E. B. White (Charlotte’s Web, Stuart Little, The Trumpet of the Swan), Louise Fitzhugh (Harriet the Spy), and so many others.
• As such, it’s a fascinating look at how this one editor worked with and encouraged artists and writers to fulfill their creativity in so many different kinds of works.
• It may also remind readers of or introduce them to classic children’s books to read—I, for example, never read any Ruth Krauss as a kid, but she sounds completely insane (in the best possible way) and now I want to read everything she ever wrote.
• Nordstrom’s sense of what makes a good children’s book comes across well through her letters, and she’s completely right and her ideas are worth absorbing. She was never one for coddling or talking down to children, or for turning them into precious, whimsical little sprites. She was all for helping them be themselves and listening to what they wanted, rather than what the overprotective adults in the industry wanted—and her body of work, her influence and legacy in children’s literature through the 1950s–70s, is shown in the quality of the books she published, and how many of them remain classics even today. As a reader of many of those books when I was a kid, I feel as though I personally benefited from Ursula Nordstrom’s understanding of good books for young people.
• Reading her practical advice is fascinating, from the perspective of seeing exactly the kind of value that good editorial advice can have. There’s one in particular to Syd Hoff, the author of Danny and the Dinosaur, where she gets extremely specific about the diction and syntax so that the book both sounds authentic and is appropriate for an “I Can Read” book (a concept she invented), as well as her input on details of illustrations. It’s clear that she cared deeply about helping the book become the best it could be, and that she did just that.
• She is inspirational as someone who stuck by her decisions and stood by her authors, whether in the case of Maurice Sendak’s illustration of a naked little boy (censored), the first YA novel featuring a scene involving a teenage boy’s homosexual experience, or Harriet’s family (condemned as being “more appropriate for a New Yorker story than for children’s literature”).
• Nevertheless, she was receptive to genuine critiques, and engaged with the young people who wrote in to comment on the books. For example, one young reader objected to Laura Ingalls Wilder’s language implying that Native Americans were not people, and Nordstrom wrote back to express her horrified agreement, and a promise to change the wording in subsequent editions.
• She’s also inspirational as a figure in the history of working women.

What is there not to like?

The letters are selected, not complete. This is certainly not an inherent flaw, but at times the reader gets only bits rather than the full arc of the editorial process behind a book.

Similar To:

Caldecott & Co., Maurice Sendak