The Warsaw Anagrams - Richard Zimler The question of what it takes to survie in times of trial is a hard one. The question of what happened then and what happened to are even harder. The hardest, perhaps, is what happens after. This book offers answers to those questions. Set in the Warsaw Ghetto, prior to its uprising and liquidation, the book is part mystery, part deep thought, and all good.In America, while we have our guilt over the second World War (Japanese/Italian/German interment), we also had it easier in the war's aftermath. Not just the question of rebuilding, but we never were conquered and had to deal with the Nazi threat in such a direct and viseral way. France and Poland, for instance, seem to have problems with the question of what happened then. Perhaps some of arises out of guilt, but the issue is still. If you don't believe -what about the Polish response to the movie Defiance? In some ways, Anagrams deals with this as well.The full range and horror of German occupation is in this book, is felt by the reader, not only in regards to the "Final Solution" but in terms of what happened to those who weren't Jewish, just Polish (who were considered sub-human). All types of dangers are present.The central character, Cohen, recieves aid and hinderance thoroughout the novel as he struggles to get to the heart of a series of gruesome murders. The description of life in the ghetto, however, is more horrifiying than the murders themselves, which don't necessary lack power, but whose emotional response lies in the burying of the dead. The setting of the ghetto, the dirt, the closeness, the despair, becomes another character. IN fact all of the settings become characters, for the reader feels the change when the character leaves. There is something different in the tone. It is subtle and that is why it works. It makes the book.That and the book's brutal honesty. For the book is honest, but not judgemental (except in regards to one character). The book allows the reader to reach conclusions about the rightness and the wrongness of the actions, about evil, good, pity, faith, and love. It is such a multi-layered look at such an issue, white, black, grey - all are here.

Shifty at first, but then it settles into one story. I wasn't sure what to make of that, but ultimately, Lorrie Moore killed me with her twisting phrases. I had read some of her short stories, but will now be reading everything I can get my hands on by her after this one.

Weird, surreal ending but an intriguing way of viewing life in this hellish ghetto.

Thirteen years ago, the dean of my law school gave a speech on our orientation day about how what good lawyers do is to “turn the crystal” on the law – look at it from different angles, bend the light a little differently and see how a whole new world of ideas can open up just by virtue of a different perspective. I often thought of that long-ago lecture while reading this book, as I watched Moore turn the crystal on three people and how their lives intertwine under different sets of circumstances.

This slender volume could more accurately be described as a set of linked stories than a novel. Each “chapter” puts Benna, Gerard and Eleanor together in different iterations and looks at how their lives would shake out as small, or sometimes large, things about their histories are changed. It's an intriguing conceit for a set of stories – a literary, personal-scale version of the science fictional alternate universe trope.

Most of the stories are told from Benna's point-of-view, and it's Benna who is struggling to connect to Gerard, to Eleanor, or to herself. Moore has a gentle, self-deprecating style littered with jokes and puns and nuggets of wisdom that often felt like she was peering into my life and my heart and saying, “You are not alone in this.” I think Moore understands longing, loneliness and loss better than any other contemporary writer I've read. That alone is worth a five-star rating from me.

A few favorite passages:

Pg 4 - “But what do I know.” She smiled and shrugged. “I grew up in a trailer. It's not like a real family with a house.” This was her excuse for everything, her own self-deprecating refrain; she'd grown up in a trailer in upstate New York and was therefore unqualified to pronounce on any of the subjects she continued to pronounce on.

Pg 10 – This is why I was pleased: The lump was not simply a focal point for my self-pity; it was also a battery propelling me, strengthening me—my very own appointment with death. It anchored and deepened me like a secret. I started to feel it when I walked, just out from my armpit—hard, achy evidence that I was truly a knotted saint, a bleeding angel. At last it had been confirmed: My life was really as difficult as I had always suspected.

Pg 16 – Basically, I realized I was living in that awful stage of life between twenty-six to thirty-seven known as stupidity. It's when you don't know anything, not even as much as you did when you were younger, and you don't even have a philosophy about all the things you don't know, the way you did when you were twenty or would again when you were thirty-eight.

Pg 39 – But I believed in starting over. There was finally, I knew, only rupture and hurt and falling short between all persons, but, Shirley, the best revenge was to turn your life into a small gathering of miracles.

If I could not be anchored and profound, I would try, at least, to be kind.

Pg. 109 - People talk past us, we are invisible; when they say our name, if they really look at us, they don't mean it, they only want us to say anything, anything stupid, but our dark woman's voice, we know, would terrify.

Gerard and Benna. Benna loves Gerard. No, Benna and Gerard are friends. No, Benna and Gerard are neighbors. Thus, this novel. The identities of Benna and Gerard ebb and flow through this novel, changing in each chapter, each subchapter. A daughter appears, but, no, she is an illusion. A friend appears, but, no, she, too, is imaginary. Or are they? Nothing is clear in this novel of relationships and meaning. A good choice for a re-reading, I think, and discussion.