
I'm conflicted. The structure of the sentences are, for the most part, good. But there is some tense switches, some misused words, and some repetition that make it clear that the book sorely needs an editor. Add to that some depictions of assorted ethnicities that made me slightly uncomfortable, and this looks like it might end up being a one half to two star review. (Just how much I like the story, and just how prevalent these issues are, will factor into the rating.)
And while I do consider Gavin a friend, I've also spoken to him, and told him I think this book needs an editor. Before starting this, I looked over some of the five star reviews, just because I sometimes do that; they said, mostly, that they liked the story, and I've got to admit I'm intrigued so far. Certainly intrigued enough to read on. (Although I was waiting to watch the newest episodes of In the Flesh, so the macabre part of me switched to a reread of Warm Bodies to fit into that theme.)
I think Gavin also knows me well enough to know that I won't lie to him, mostly because I respect him too much to lie to him. Also, I've been questioned as to why Gavin is someone I'm following and why he isn't on the vetted SPA list, and this is why: I'd read enough of the book to see that there were issues, and disqualified it. I respect both Gavin, and my other followers, enough not to put a book up there simply because they are a friend.
Should the next book be properly edited? I'd consider adding him, so long as this book went through the same treatment.
I'd like to think this is me being even-handed and as unbiased as possible. I'd also like to think that this is me being transparent about the relationship between Gavin and me. He's a friend. We've shared conversations both in public and in private. We've had a rough patch, but despite this, and despite him making decisions that I understand - but don't condone, and that, quite frankly make me ill when I think of them - he's also been very kind to me, and because of this, he is still my friend.
I only hope that a review that is honest, even a brutally honest review, will not change that, although I know it has with other friends in the past. (< -- and just because this is a hot topic, yes, this is an invitation for Gavin to post on my review as much as I invite other authors to post. And by that I mean so long as they don't tell me how to review, I don't have beef with them. As soon as they start doing that, which is their right, I have beef. It's a mistake in my opinion, but one which they are free to make.)