On the day before his twenty-first wedding anniversary, David Sullinger buried an ax in his wife's skull. Now, eight jurors must retire to the deliberation room and decide whether David committed premeditated murder-or whether he was a battered spouse who killed his wife in self-defense.
Told from the perspective of over a dozen participants in a murder trial, We, the Jury examines how public perception can mask the ghastliest nightmares. As the jurors stagger toward a verdict, they must sift through contradictory testimony from the Sullingers' children, who disagree on which parent was Satan; sort out conflicting allegations of severe physical abuse, adultery, and incest; and overcome personal animosities and biases that threaten a fair and just verdict. Ultimately, the central figures in We, the Jury must navigate the blurred boundaries between bias and objectivity, fiction and truth.
My take: I am a paralegal (and library assistant on Saturdays) and work in law all day long... so when I get home it's the last thing I want to read about. I love my job, but I do like to escape it a while too. However, this book looked fascinating to me as it is written using so many POVs during a murder trial. It was very eye opening, not only to the way juries might act, but by the way humans interact. Crazy. I wish it had been longer and I found I wanted to dive deeper into each juror's life and deeper into the murder. It left me with a very uneasy feeling too. I didn't see the ending coming, although it was probably pretty obvious. Very good, easy read!
Using it for Genre: Suspense.