The God Delusion
The God Delusion caused a sensation when it was published in 2006. Within weeks it became the most hotly debated topic, with Dawkins himself branded as either saint or sinner for presenting his hard-hitting, impassioned rebuttal of religion of all types. His argument could hardly be more topical.... show more
The God Delusion caused a sensation when it was published in 2006. Within weeks it became the most hotly debated topic, with Dawkins himself branded as either saint or sinner for presenting his hard-hitting, impassioned rebuttal of religion of all types. His argument could hardly be more topical. While Europe is becoming increasingly secularized, the rise of religious fundamentalism, whether in the Middle East or Middle America, is dramatically and dangerously dividing opinion around the world. In America, and elsewhere, a vigorous dispute between 'intelligent design' and Darwinism is seriously undermining and restricting the teaching of science. In many countries religious dogma from medieval times still serves to abuse basic human rights such as women's and gay rights. And all from a belief in a God whose existence lacks evidence of any kind.Dawkins attacks God in all his forms. He eviscerates the major arguments for religion and demonstrates the supreme improbability of a supreme being. He shows how religion fuels war, foments bigotry and abuses children.The God Delusion is a brilliantly argued, fascinating polemic that will be required reading for anyone interested in this most emotional and important subject.
Publish date: September 22nd 2009
Publisher: Transworld Digital
Pages no: 464
Edition language: English
, Popular Science
No, not perfect in its argumentation; and yes, Dawkins is preachy. However, considering what and whom he's up against I'm inclined to forgive him his flaws.
This took me a while to get through, not because it was bad, but because there is a lot of information and material to get through and understand (and I had to take multiple breaks to get away from the realistic, logical arguments and read something fun).Overall, I think this was very well written. ...
The first time I tried to read this book, I gave it up within about three pages, convinced that it was far too narrowly focused and inadequately researched to be a worthwhile criticism of religion. I had also recently seen the author give an interview in which he showed himself to be an unbearable, ...
I more or less share Dawkins's stance on religion, also on evolution and other science, though I'm a lot less heated in my opinions. However, this book is a bit repetitive, and lots of arguments are unnecessarily wordy.
بداية،السبب الرئيس لتقييمي المنخفض للكتاب، ليس بسبب انه كتاب يدعو إلى الإلحاد، ولا لأن كاتبه هو "ريتشارد دوكينز". بل السبب الأساسي في عدم إعجابي بالكتاب هو أنني قبل قراءتي له، توقعت ان رجلا عالما له وزنه مثل السيد دوكينز، ستكون له دراية واسعة وكبيرة في مجال الأديان والفلسفة العقلية وغيرها من المجالا...