This looks like an interesting book, doesn't it?I haven't read it. The protesters to GR/Amazon random deletions from the site have recommended it to me, though, and I'm shelving it and use it for a few thoughts and to Hydra removed reviews.The GR announcement declared that reviews "focused on author...
Hello there,Your review of Non Censure was recently flagged by Goodreads members as potentially off-topic. As the review is not about the book, it has been removed from the site. You can find the text of the review attached for your personal records.Additionally, your reviews of the following books...
Reposting a review from Clouds in accordance with the hydra principle:Hello there,Your review of Non Censure was recently flagged by Goodreads members as potentially off-topic. As the review is not about the book, it has been removed from the site. You can find the text of the review attached for yo...
Reposted with permission from Clouds who recently had this review and nine others deleted.-Ruby------------------------------------------Hello there,Your review of Non Censure was recently flagged by Goodreads members as potentially off-topic. As the review is not about the book, it has been removed...
I did not read this book, but I do believe in the concept. Within reason, of course. I'm not a supporter of hate speech, but that's precisely why free discussion about a book and its author needs to be part of a review. If the author supports ASPCA, I want to know. If the author donates money and us...
Again, I've decided to post up a few reviews in relation to this idea here: Until I hear that Goodreads has finally admitted publicly to the changes in their terms of service/reviewing policies (which as they stand are outdated and only current to 2010 'officially'). Sure, they've currently admitted...
Log in with Facebook 
