That's what you said six months ago to me. And, as I understand it, the matter had become controversial long before the reblogging problem hit me personally. As I wrote six months ago to your assurances that something would be decided, I hope you will decide soon and decide correctly (i.e. protect t...
more »
Booklikes, we have been waiting for months now; some of us for much longer. When are you going to do something? If you don't allow the actual posters to control their own posts, I expect I won't be the only active blogger who has stopped posting on your site.
more »
When will you roll out the changes in the re-blogging function?
more »
Has a representative of BL explained somewhere why they insist on having the reblog feature?
more »
Then I look forward to see how you resolve the problem.
more »
Then I'll add my two bits. It should be easy to program the following: No post can be reblogged unless the author of the post clicks an approval. The reblogged text should then stay linked with the original in such a way that if the original author edits their text, the reblog is correspondingly cha...
more »
Thank you, Rachel, but such a note is no more than a nonbinding request. But I am keeping my BL account and will monitor the developments. I hope I can re-commence my reviewing here at some future date.
more »
On the moderator's urging I'd like to register here my dissatisfaction with the reblog feature. Not only can one's posts be reblogged without the author's permission (this is unacceptable to me), but the reblogs do not reflect any subsequent editing by the original author (and this is unacceptable t...
more »