"The purpose of that place still continues to elude them. Is it merely an aberration of physics? Some kind of warp in space? Or just a topiary labyrinth on a much grander scale? Perhaps it serves a funeral purpose? Conceals a secret? Protects something? Imprisons or hides some kind of monster? Or fo...
I've been sitting on this review for a couple weeks and I'm still not sure how to do it. Mark Z. Danielewski's House of Leaves in a seminal piece of experimental literature, and is probably the best known book of its kind. House of Leaves experiments not only with authorship and story structure, ...
Imagine a cross between Vladimir Nabokov's Pale Fire and Marisha Pessl's Night Film and you've got something approximating House of Leaves. It's a deeply weird book, one presented as a commentary on a film known as The Navidson Record, about a family who moves to an old house in the country only to ...
House of Leaves is the kind of story that loves to mess with your head a "little" bit. It doesn't have one storyline and one of the stories can be unreliable at times due to his increasing lack of sanity. I found myself spiralling downwards in a maze of subtle confusion as I continued through this n...
Frankly I like my books more straightforward. House of Leaves felt too clever for my liking. There are several story lines running at the same time and there are points when the writing needs to be read in a mirror or is highlighted with copious (and I mean copious) footnotes. Even though the novel ...
I want to read this very badly, but I need to actually buy a copy to be able to take my time and read through it. Very interested after reading the small bit I have already.
bookshelves: boo-scary, re-read, paper-read, play-dramatisation, published-2000, autumn-2011, radio-4, architecture Read from October 29, 2000 to October 29, 2011 A tongue-in-cheek re-visit via BBC - how fab!Adapted by Mike Walker."The Navidson Record now stands as part of this country's cultura...
Torn about this - as the book progressed, my attention decreased rapidly. The three stars comprise of two ratings; five stars for the first half and the idea in general and one star from then on. Too much babbling, too many distractions to appreciate. However, I may be back to change my rating later...
Important: Our sites use cookies.
We use the information stored using cookies and similar technologies for advertising and statistics purposes.
Stored data allow us to tailor the websites to individual user's interests.
Cookies may be also used by third parties cooperating with BookLikes, like advertisers, research companies and providers of multimedia applications.
You can choose how cookies are handled by your device via your browser settings.
If you choose not to receive cookies at any time, BookLikes will not function properly and certain services will not be provided.
For more information, please go to our Privacy Policy.
Log in with Facebook 
