![They Hunger - Scott Nicholson They Hunger - Scott Nicholson](http://booklikes.com/photo/max/220/330/upload/books/85/68/ac5e2a37fd77848c97563dc97c9fcbcb.jpg)
I'm a completionist. I'd read all of Scott Nicholson's Pinnacle-era books aside from this one, so I figured I'd finally cross this one off my list. What took me so long? Well, I don't like vampires. I've only ever liked two bloodsucker stories in my life: 'Salem's Lot and 30 Days of Night. Sorry, this one didn't make the list.
I've never come across a single line of text that ruined an entire book for me, but this one did:
"Lane, who had scrambled to his hands and knees beneath the creature and was posed like a bottom in a gay porn flick, let out a grunt."
It was jarring, and I didn't know how to take it. What am I suppose to glean from that simile? That gay sex makes one vulnerable? That two men having intercourse is a scary thing? Was it supposed to be a bit of tension-cutting comic relief? If so, I didn't find it funny. My main point is this: you could cut every bit about gay porn and the sentence would be just as strong, if not stronger. Just saying the guy was on his hands and knees was plenty. It took me out of the moment. I almost quit the book. If that sentence hadn't been so far into the novel, I would have, but by the time it dropped, I was invested in the story. I still can't think of one good reason for that simile. If you can think of one, please, comment below. (Oh, and I wasn't disgusted by the idea of two men fucking. It just didn't work in context. Had it said "like a woman taking it doggy style" I still would have felt the need to put it down. After all, the monster is not trying to fuck this guy.)
Scott Nicholson is a guilty pleasure of mine. I found him around the time I found Bentley Little, and only picked up my first Nicholson book because Little had written the blurb on the cover. Scott Nicholson is not the next Stephen King, nor does Nicholson even pretend to write literary horror. He's a genre writer. I happen to like genre writers. Bentley Little, Richard Laymon, Edward Lee, Brian Keene, and Scott Nicholson all fall into that category, and you know that, going into their books, you're in for some big dumb gory fun. You just have to shut off your brain and enjoy the ride. (I can hear it now, "Then why didn't you just shut off your brain during that gay porn sentence?" Because I didn't. That's how much that sentence took me out of the story. It made me think when I didn't want to."
With this book, I was mostly bored up until halfway through. There was a lot of exposition, mainly having to do with a fictional outdoorsy company, and the writing felt as if Nicholson was just going through the motions, mistaking world-building for character development. When the action did start, it was fast and furious. One of the cooler scenes has to do with one of the monsters gliding out of the fog. I saw the scene clearly in my mind, and was more than a little creeped out.
The final 80 pages of this book made this a worthwhile read. Nicholson's choice of survivors tickled me. It took a huge amount of balls to keep a certain someone alive, and I respect that.
Also, I don't think Nicholson has ever heard the term "Pocket Rocket", so I will hold back my judgment. I will say this: a Pocket Rocket is not a piece of camping equipment. Ladies, can I get an Amen?
In summation: I don't regret reading this, but it'll probably disappear from my memory in a few weeks. Nothing to write home to mother about, unless Mom likes awkward similes. I do, however, recommended The Harvest or The Manor (the latter is now Creative Spirit), both of which are fine Nicholson books. The Red Church, The Home, and The Farm are decent but not spectacular, yet they're both better than They Hunger.