And the novel continues...

                             EDIT REVIEW:
Okay so a certain "idiot" (well 2 idiots) decided that it wasn't enough to call me a hypocritical because i wasn't in awe of his masterpiece. I'm not even going to comment on the "mommy brigade" tirade....because *i don't think the word mom means what you think it does*. Maybe you'll want to check that out...

His "revolutionary masterpiece".
You know where you can find more of this crap? Neanderthal land...check it out.

This is the latest rant of this "ethical" person:

Over the past 2/3 days I’ve had three of my books’ pages on GoodReads bombarded with complete dunces. People who’ve reverted to calling me ‘misogynistic’ and ‘racist’ because my collaborator Joel publicly noted the shortsightedness in one woman’s review of my novel Disorderly. She had failed to realize that the book was deliberately written from the perspective of one of society’s worst cretins and Joel pointed that out.

So, now i'm short-sighted. Okay...

This is how the author, our ethical and honest person decided to fight back. This are his words:

So here’s what I’m willing to offer to you, my kind followers.

If you help rebel against the influx of 1 star reviews by rating it yourself with 5 stars, or leave a review protesting the emotional and intellectual maturity of these complete morons, I will give you a free book. You can read the book, and once you’ve read it—if you feel like changing your rating—feel free. No harm no foul.

But for now I need to even out the scores of these books to where they once were and right my reputation on GoodReads and I cannot do that alone. There are about 30 of these ignoramuses and GoodReads has done nothing despite many flagging their comments.
http://captaincoolasfuck.com/post/80972547132/important

I've been nothing but honest with this piece of...writing that i forced myself to finish!

I NEVER, EVER MENTIONED THE AUTHOR!

The one who keeps drawing parallels between the cannibal (our main character) and the author, is the AUTHOR.

Which any literate person can comprove for his/herself.

So, after long consideration, i decided that i'm not comfortable in maintaining the previous two stars that i gave to this book.

Basically because i'll never ever recommend this crap to anyone. And according to GR's guidelines, a two star rating means "okay".
This was not okay for me.
There.

Anything else to tell me?

Oh, yes, FURTHER TROLLS ATTACKS WILL BE REPORTED!
I'M NOT YOUR MUMMY TO PUT UP WITH YOUR NONSENSES.
GROW UP.

Arc provided by the publishing house in exchange for a honest review

Disorderly is the story of a man in his late twenties who has been diagnosed with brain cancer in the last stage...
Now, this is nothing new on the literary world, right?
Hum, however I can't say the same thing about what follows...

More than appreciated for its story, this tale is something to be thoroughly analyzed for its provocative and extremely generous use of clichés used to characterize modern society.

The writing is fluid and engaging, proving that if the writing is good enough, one can read almost about anything... even while secretly wishing that the main character has a violent death to put us out of our misery.

Colton is the definition of a toxic personality. He's demanding, controlling, manipulative, misogynistic, racist, xenophobic... wait, there's more... self-absorbed, detached (psychopath), basically an egotistical bas... I mean... character...

Told in a definite woman hater tone (I'm curious about the number of people who will notice this), Disorderly shows us a world where, through the main character eyes, all women are bitches, c*****ts, basically a "sexual outlet to plug my dick into.." (pg 73)

Disorderly is a book that, if a woman has a few working brain cells, she will have a hard time to... I would say swallow, but I'm afraid that in such a case _ mind in the gutter and sex obsessed _ this could be poorly understood in this story...
....strong feelings of rage and disbelief may follow while reading it. Because I have never, ever read a story featuring such a disgusting excuse for a human being (is he a human being or just a bunch of functional organs?)
So if that was the author's purpose, I congratulate him on that. If besides that, Colt is supposed to embody what goes on in the mind of the modern man of our day (who doesn't remember how women were represented in series such as The Sopranos?) well, I'm seriously considering becoming an hermit...

Warning: The following text may incite strong feelings... maybe it would be best if you'd keep some distance from your electronic devices...

Here are a few examples of how women are described in Colton's fantasy land:

And I couldn’t help but notice the curves of her body—the way those jeans hugged her ass and thighs.
My god, that ass.
I knew that ass. I knew it like the back of my hand. Supple, like two hams stitched together and thrown into a pair of tight pants. It was the kind of ass that one might mistake for having belonged to a black girl. Or at least a chubby Cuban. I’d have recognized it anywhere.

“And worse than my parents going out of their way to invite somebody that burned me, that hurt me to my God damn core and ruined my life, she had the nerve to show up—wear some slutty
outfit(..)"

Ah, us women and our slutty outfits...
Burkhas, just give us burkhas...

Knowing her stubborn, cunty self, (pg 73)

She was a nice lady, older, somewhat attractive but too motherly to fuck. (pg 79)

“You know that cunt of a mother of yours?" (92)

Then there were the Racist comments:
“Yep, he was a brown fucker,” (pg 73)

"I hope he's not black."

"olive-skinned gentleman with a buzz cut and a tattoo of a cross on the side of his neck." (pg 120)

"The Latino gent turned to me and said, “Yo, man.”(121)

"“Shit, nigga, I can barely read—let alone write."(122)

Then, there's the xenophobic remarks:

Break that fuckin’ stupid ginger-Jew nose of hers. Bitch.” (143)

“Some bitch that isn’t doing her race any favors by disproving the ‘angry black woman’ stereotype.” (158)

Misogynistic:
Tricia was never particularly fond of me, for one reason or another. (99)

“Have you been messing around with loose women?” (112)

Loose women. I suppose their willingness around a man who could be mistaken for having syphilis would be a testament to just how “open” they truly were" (263)

Bottom line: Nothing negative (UGH!) to point regarding the writing. The theme, well kudos for his imagination...

This book, well it will be loved or hated, depending on who reads it...probably some will adore it, and others will hate it.

Myself...well diplomatically speaking, this isn't my cup of tea.

In which Jamie K. feels the need to call out Khanh, and his followers call her names.

tw: gendered slurs, but what do you expect from these people?