logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: russian
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2018-12-07 11:52
Russian Roulette - Veronica Figg
This book was a short read, and did a pretty good job of holding one's attention. It is about a girl, trained to be a professional killer from a child, working initially in Russia, and later for the CIA, and sent on a mission to Russia to kill the very man than trained her in the beginning. While the plot was good and had good suspense, it felt as though the author wanted to get parts of it done quick and some of the situations were resolved a little too "pat", but that being said, I felt it held tons of promise, and the writer huge amounts of talent. This is a first book by a young author, only 13, and I feel, will be a name to watch for in the future. That is why I gave it as high of a rating as I did-- the author has a good imagination and a way with words.... I can't wait to see what she comes up with as her talent develops and matures!
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review SPOILER ALERT! 2018-11-27 22:35
Ballard and Bosch: A Michael Connelly Mini-Binge
The Late Show - Michael Connelly
The Late Show - Michael Connelly
Two Kinds of Truth - Michael Connelly
Two Kinds of Truth - Michael Connelly,Titus Welliver
Dark Sacred Night - Michael Connelly
Dark Sacred Night - Michael Connelly,Titus Welliver,Christine Lakin

I managed to fall behind on 3 books by Michael Connelly over the course of the past 2 years -- how in the world did that happen?  He's one of my most consistent go-to authors for reliably high quality crime fiction ... as well as for taking me right back to L.A., if only inside my head.  So, high time to catch up, especially since everybody else whose reviews I trust seems to have already read and reviewed these three.  In sum, I find that I'm mostly happy to have returned to what's come to be known as "the Harry Bosch universe" ... though the obvious question is how long Connelly is going to be able to keep Bosch going.  Are we seeing a changing of the guard, with Renée Ballard and Mickey Haller -- and possibly Maddie Bosch -- eventually taking Harry's place?  Last year, Connelly still said no, but 14 months on from that interview, I'm not sure that's still the answer he would give now.  Ultimately, time and the next books will have to tell.

 

To take each book in turn:

 

The Late Show (2017)

 

Renée Ballard's debut.  Her character is based on a real cop, LAPD Detective Mitzi Roberts, who is an advisor to Connelly (and, I think, the Harry Bosch TV series), and who once worked the "late show" -- the night shift -- in the Hollywood division herself; so Renée's character and work environment comes with a lot of personal insight, and it shows (even if it's not Connelly's own, first-hand insight). 

 

Obviously Connelly had to give Ballard a motivation to want to hang on to the cases we see her confronting in the first pages of the book instead of just handing them over to the relevant "desks" tasked with these kinds of crimes in daytime hours, and it just about works here -- but even in this first book I wasn't wholly convinced, and I can see several problems with this scenario going forward.  To name but two: (1) Detectives on the "late show" simply do not handle cases to the end, and at some point the reasons Connelly gives Ballard for wanting to hang on to her initial investigations are almost necessarily going to stretch credibility -- in and of themselves as well as in terms of their overall frequency.  (2) Anyone who's ever pulled several allnighters in a row, or existed for a sustained period on a maximum of 3-4 hours of sleep (with irregular sleeping times at that) knows that this sort of lifestyle is a virtually guaranteed shortcut to a crashing burnout -- and I don't mean the kind that can be cured by a few good nights of rest or an extended vacation.  So I think at some point Connelly won't have any other option than making Ballard return to daytime hours if he wants to keep her storyline credible. 

I can see why she'd reject the option at the end of this particular book, coming as it does from a completely unapologetic Lt. Olivas, but eventually she'll just have to find a way.  Maybe her guilty feelings about Lola and about having to kennel her all the time are going to make a difference?

(spoiler show)

That all being said, I mostly like Ballard -- she's smart, tough and straightforward; just what I want my heroines to be, not least if they are cops.  She's also a bit reckless, though, and that's another thing that could turn out a problem eventually (not only for herself, for obvious reasons, but also in the meta-world, with Connelly's readers).  The book's writing and plotting are Michael Connelly at his most atmospheric and empathetic, however, and the three interwoven cases / storylines are classic L.A. -- murder, corruption, fraud, and the shady side of Sunset Boulevard.  What's not to like about that ... as crime fiction fodder, at any rate?

 

 

Two Kinds of Truth (2017)

 

Much as I liked Renée Ballard, I confess I was more than happy to return to Harry Bosch in this book, who still finds himself where recent events have landed him ... as a volunteer with SFPD (that's San Fernando Police Department, not San Francisco) in "the Valley" on the other (= northern) side of the mountain range separating the City of Los Angeles from, well, the San Fernando Valley.  (And yes, "from the Valley" and "Valley girl / boy" still has a similar connotation as "hillbilly" does elsewhere in the U.S. -- or anyway, it still used to have when I was living in L.A.  Despicable cliché aside, not that there's actually much justification to this, what with easily half of L.A.'s white collar workforce now living either in "the Valley" or elsewhere outside the City of Los Angeles proper, but I guess old stereotypes die hard.)

 

In essence, I was pretty happy, too, with the way Connelly managed to find a way for Bosch to keep his hand in "proper" police business even after his inglorious exit from LAPD -- permanently becoming an investigator for a defense attorney, even for his half-brother Mickey Haller, simply would not have suited him.  Connelly overplayed the "experienced RHD detective" card a bit at the beginning of this book, I thought: surely, even in a small police department like SFPD that sees few murders by L.A. standards (which, let's face it, still doesn't necessarily mean "few" in absolute terms), officers securing a murder scene would not have to be told by a volunteer retired detective (a) to completely cordon off the entire scene and (b) to secure the scene by watching / looking outward, not inward, from their positions at the cordon.  And if I didn't have reason to believe Harry was keeping himself fit for his activities at SFPD (because even clearing cold cases isn't exactly a 9-to-5 desk job), and if I hadn't also watched him bluff himself out of a critical situation often enough over the course of his career, I might have disbelieved the final "showdown"

in a small passenger plane while flying over the desert

(spoiler show)

at the end of one of the book's interwoven investigative strands.

 

But by and large, it made sense to me for Harry to be involved in an investigation specifically making use of his advancing age by having him go undercover in a prescription drug smuggling sting as an allegedly addicted retiree; and it also made sense to me for his complicated relationship with the LAPD to play out the way it does here in an old case threatening to bite him in the rear.  And although the final courtroom scene in that case has distinct overtones of Law and Order (which is not necessarily a statement on its verisimilitude -- though for the record, I love Law and Order), and it moreover relies on a near-deus-ex-machina-style coincidence and on a manipulation on the part of Haller bordering on the unethical and perilous to Harry to boot, I can't help but root for Haller and Bosch as a team, and for Haller to take down the bad guys in court at the end, every single time.  As a side note, I was also happy for a former partner of Bosch's to make a surprise reappearance here.

 

So all in all, I was a pretty happy camper with this book, and given that the writing and plotting here is easily up to Connelly's best, I'd have been completely willing to overlook minor quibbles like the "should SFPD officers really need Harry Bosch to tell them how to secure a murder scene" bit ... if the book hadn't ended on a note playing straight into one of my growing grumbles with the series as a whole,

namely, Harry's penchant for "fatal" women.  (Which is not necessarily the same as "femmes fatales", btw, though he sure has had his share of encounters with those as well.)

(spoiler show)

  Which leads me straight on to my review of the currently latest book in the series, and since one particular narrative strain (and especially the ending) of Two Kinds of Truth also sets up the core premise of Dark Sacred Night, I'm going to put the better part of my review of that book into spoiler tags, because there's no way I can address my quibbles with that book without also addressing those narrative elements -- they are in fact what gives rise to my quibbles.

 

 

Dark Sacred Night (2018)

Given that Michael Connelly's fictional extension of L.A. is essentially a homogeneous universe in which all of his main characters meet sooner or later, it was only a matter of time until Renée Ballard would run into Harry Bosch.  She does so here ... and lands another investigation that takes her out of her "late show" duties; a cold case that nobody is seriously pursuing, not even Lucía Soto, Bosch's final partner at LAPD, who is officially the lead investigator but who has been pulled into the Department's #MeToo task force. 

 

And let's get this one out of the way first, if I had slight concerns where Connelly might be going with Ballard's "moonlighting at daytime" in The Late Show, they certainly didn't get any less here.  I'm not a cop, but I have had, in my own life, more than one day-night-day(-night-day) sequence of the sort that Ballard is giving herself here, and I know for certain fact that there is no way she'd still have had the mental and physical alertness she is showing here on day 2, let alone on day 3 of that sequence.  And yes, I realize that Ballard does indeed have moments where she doesn't exactly act like the sharpest knife in the LAPD's drawer.  Those, though, don't even begin to do justice to the state of exhaustion she actually should be in; even less so would she have been fit enough to fulfill the critical role she keeps playing, especially towards the end of the book.

 

My bigger concern here is with Harry Bosch, though.  And not so much on account of his age as such -- I actually liked how Connelly shows him literally being wrong-footed in a situation he had underestimated,

to the detriment of the investigation and of a witness's life and well-being, and to the point of being given the can by SFPD. 

 

But Jesus f*cking Christ, Harry, won't you ever learn a single lesson when it comes to women?  And it's not even like your readers can't see this one coming on 10 miles against a stiff headwind.  The moment I learned in Two Kinds of Truth that a woman he met there, Elizabeth Clayton, had turned to drugs to blunt the emotional trauma of the unsolved murder of her teenage runaway daughter Daisy (addicted to "hard" drugs herself and selling herself on the street), I knew what to expect next:

 

1. Bosch would go after Elizabeth, get her into detox and therapy and just generally "rescue" her from addiction.

2.  Bosch would then get involved with Elizabeth once and for all, which would include:

a)  Starting a cold case investigation into Daisy's murder, and

b)  Having a(n ultimately physical) relationship with Elizabeth -- without ever wondering whether she was actually ready for this or, for that matter, what exactly it was he felt for her ... or she for him.

3.  The whole thing would come crashing down on both Bosch and Elizabeth with disastrous results for both of them.

 

And boy, did I wish that for once I had been wrong.  But, alas, I wasn't.

 

Now, obviously helping a prescription drug addict to overcome her addiction and even offering her shelter in your own home is an act of major altruism, and if this had been my first Bosch book, I'd probably have been pretty favorably impressed with him.  As it was, though ... it just felt like we've all been down this sort of road way too often already.  And it's not like Harry is completely incapable of forming functioning close relationships; he has overcome considerable hurdles to build one with his daughter Maddie, and he's managed to work closely with many of his partners on the job: Connelly himself, in Two Kinds of Truth, uses the analogy of being able to go blindly into an intersection in a high speed car chase solely on the "all clear" of your partner, and there is not a partner in Bosch's entire career who would not have been able to trust Bosch to precisely that extent.  So for however messed-up Harry Bosch personally may be (and he assuredly is, plenty), it's not like he'd be lacking any and all social skills -- or were uncapable to take a step back and critically reflect on his own actions.  Because without either of these abilities, he would unquestionably have screwed up his relationship with Maddie to a royal degree, and nobody would have lasted long as his partner at LAPD, either.  Yet, when it comes to the women in his private life, he gets it wrong every single time.  And I'm past caring why or rationalizing based on Harry's childhood, the murder of his mother and what he later found out about it, his absent father, his Vietnam "tunnel rat" experience, and whatever else.  Harry is past retirement age.  He should have found a way to deal with his ill-perceived "saviour" complex eons ago.  It's overdue for him to finally find that way out now.

 

Thankfully, the book does actually include another investigation, and it's this one that eventually gets Bosch into trouble -- in more than one respect.  Yet, here, too he ought to seriously take a step back and critically reassess his own position.  He himself has made the resolution that, if he should ever find he's no longer up to the job, he would quit and leave the field to others.  But he's barely out on his backside from SFPD ... and what does the man do?  He walks up to Ballard and suggests an informal "cold case" partnership to her, with her being inside LAPD and him freelancing on the outside.  Which isn't only entirely unprofessional -- on both their parts, incidentally, in addition to which Ballard will be breaking pretty much every single rule of investigative and department protocol -- but also goes straight against Bosch's own resolution, because it's not like he doesn't know full well that he's out on his ear because he himself has screwed up.  Fatally.  To thine own self be true, Harry?  Ah, well ... anything to continue the series for yet another book or two, Mr. Connelly?

 

Now, if only Ballard hadn't accepted Harry's "informal partnership" offer.  But alas, she did.  And I'm currently hoping and praying that this is all we'll be seeing of them in the next book(s).  Because I got a very funny vibe at the end of Dark Sacred Night, and it's not like Ballard hasn't her share of personal issues, either ...

(spoiler show)

 

Character quibbles aside, Connelly probably couldn't write a thoroughly bad book if he tried, I'm still right back in L.A. with every word that he writes, and I actually did like the second (gang-related) narrative strain of Dark Sacred Night.  And since a key character, Elizabeth Clayton, is a mother, I'm also claiming this one for the Russian Mother's Day square in 24 Festive Tasks.

 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2018-11-26 19:05
24 Festive Tasks: Door 11 - Russian Mother's Day, Task 3 (Favorite Shoes)

These days, literally all I care about is whether "the shoe fits" and is comfortable and can be worn for hours on end without making me feel like I've stepped into some sort of medieval torture instrument.  That was radically different when I was a kid, however -- even when I was a little girl, I loved to stalk around in my mom's high-heeled shoes, never mind that you could have fit both my feet into one of those shoes back to back ... and once I'd hit my teens, my way of asserting that I had left childhood behind began with my feet.

 

My first obsession was with a pair of white, almost knee-high lace boots -- which had actually once belonged to my mom, too, but been discarded by her, the whole lace thing making them ridiculously impractical.  But unimportant little details such as this didn't deter me in the least, and I couldn't wait for the day when the coveted boots finally (just about) fit me.  That happy day finally arrived when I was 12 (I think -- or maybe 13) years old.  I don't think I ever wore them to school -- if I had, my classmates probably would have had a fit -- but they were proudly on display at family reunions and other sorts of festive occasions, probably much to the amusement of the rest of my family.

 


At Christmas, age 12 or 13, with my grandparents (2d from right and left, respectively), my grandpa's sister and her daughter (my mom's cousin)

 

And a little later, I landed the footware coup of coups; at least by my definition at the time ... a pair of sky-high (we're talking 6-inch heels), bright red sandals with delicate, slim ankle straps.  I was maybe 14 years old when I acquired them (I think I talked an aunt into buying them for me), and I'm still amazed my mom let me wear them at that age at all.  But wear them I did -- proudly, and wherever high heels were called for ... as well as, sometimes, where they weren't.  I owned them for a looong time and hereby present them to you in all their glory -- heels first, since it's the heels, after all, that counted!

 

 

(Side note: If you've seen my Women Writers Bingo master update post, you'll now understand that there really could only be one square marker for me in the context of that particular challenge.)

 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2018-11-26 15:28
Russian Mother's Day-24 Tasks

 

Russian Mother's Day

 

Task 1:  Tell us: What is the mother of all writerly sins in your book (tropes, grammar mistakes, telling instead of showing, etc.)?

 

Purple prose. It just sets me off and makes me grind my teeth. I can stand some of it, but good grief I think I almost broke something when reading Divergent. I noticed that a lot of YA authors get into purple prose and I can see why that turns a lot of readers off. 

"In purple prose, skin is always creamy, eyelashes always glistening, heroes always brooding, and sunrises always magical. Purple prose also features an abundance of metaphors and figurative language, long sentences, and abstractions."
(Jessica Page Morrell, Between the Lines. Writer's Digest Books, 2006) 

Divergent Review

 

Task 2: Do you have a favorite Mothers’ Day memory that you are happy to share? Photos welcome but optional.

 

I honestly can't think of one. My mother passed when I was 23 and two years earlier my dad died. I think that we mostly would make my mom breakfast in bed and we would have cards and presents for her. But I honestly can't think of anything that I specifically gave her for mother's day. I know that I bought my dad a tool box for father's day. I only remember that since it was so expensive and I used my first paycheck while working to do it. 

 

Task 3: Perhaps the best-known scene in the James Bond novel and film From Russia With Love is 007 being poisoned by Russian agent Rosa Klebb with a venom-laced blade hidden in her shoe. Tell us: Have you ever owned any particular / outrageous / funny / best-beloved or otherwise special pair of shoes? Post a photo if you should still own them.

 

I don't have a picture of them. But starting 9th grade I had these bright blue shoes that I initially loved since they were funky to me. First day of school, two of my best friends called them Smurf shoes and after being made fun of all day I stuck them in the closet to never wear again. My parents were annoyed with me since it's not like shoes grow on trees and made me wear them. I pretty much tried to dirty them up and take the blue off anyway I could. Also these shoes bled through and my socks turned blue every time I would wear these shoes. 

 

Task 4: Make a traditional Russian dish like borscht, blintzes, pirogi or solyanka soup, and share a picture with us. Find recipe suggestions here: https://www.expatica.com/ru/about/Top-10-Russian-foods-and-recipes_108678.html

 

Going to pass on this one. 

 

Book: Read a book set in Russia, or involving a story within a story / play within a play (like the Russian matryoshka dolls stuck inside each other), or where a key character (not necessarily the protagonist) is a mother.

 

I have some ideas. Will have to just think on it a little more. 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2018-11-25 19:44
24 Festive Tasks: Door 11 - Russian Mother's Day, Task 1 (Mother of All Writerly Sins)

The mother of all writerly sins, in my book, is simply to annoy or to bore me.  I know that sounds awfully general, but that's what it comes down to -- it can be a trope, or too self-involved writing (looking at you, Dr. Brusatte and Ms. Wright), or sloppy editing or research, or too much stuffing, or too much telling instead of showing, or simply bad grammar ... any and all of these will set off my inner ranting reviewer.  I may not actually bother to write a review, even if I finish the book (which isn't a given), but I'll remember the reading experience, and even if I may eventually try another book by the same author -- which isn't a given, either -- (s)he will be up against a considerable bias on my part.

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?