logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: suing-the-nhs
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
photo 2020-05-30 09:27

If you think you or your family are suffering by medical negligence. Medical Negligence Direct is providing the 12 important things which will help you have a better understanding of the medical negligence claim process, If you want to claims for medical negligence. To know more Contact us 0800-644-4240 or visit here.

Source: www.medicalnegligencedirect.com
Like Reblog Comment
url 2020-05-26 09:07
Medical Negligence Claims Guide | Medical Negligence - Medical Negligence Direct

Do you know about the Medical Negligence claims. We discussed the basic guide of Medical Negligence claims in our Blog. Like how to make a medical negligence claims, type of medical negligence, Compensation claims, NHS medical Negligence & more. To know more read here.

Source: www.medicalnegligencedirect.com
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2016-07-22 20:49
Amazon (Finally) Suing Sellers Over Fake Reviews

(reblogged from MarketingLand.com)

 

 

 
amazon-orange-1920

 

One of Amazon’s most appealing features is the unbiased reviews provided to members. Unfortunately, it turns out that some sellers have taken it upon themselves to feed fake reviews to their customers-to-be. This wouldn’t be a prudent idea. Amazon is (and has been) suing those sellers that are buying positive reviews.

 

Amazon has previously sued to stop websites that sell fake Amazon reviews, along with individuals offering to write fake reviews. This latest batch of lawsuits is against the companies that buy fake reviews for their products.

 

A story from TechCrunch this week reports that three new lawsuits were brought against sellers where the fake reviews made up 30 percent to 45 percent of the overall reviews. According to TechCrunch, the defendants are Michael Abbara of California, Kurt Bauer of Pennsylvania and a Chinese company called CCBetter Direct.

 

We reached out to Amazon for comment and received the following in regard to these cases:

While we cannot comment on active litigation, we can share that since the beginning of 2015, we have sued over 1,000 defendants who offered to post fake reviews for payment. We are constantly monitoring and will take action against abusive sellers by suspending and closing their accounts and by taking further legal action. Our goal is to eliminate the incentives for sellers to engage in review abuse and shut down this ecosystem around fraudulent reviews in exchange for compensation. Lawsuits are only one piece of the puzzle. We are working hard on technologies that allow us to detect and take enforcement action against perpetrators while also preventing fake reviews from ever surfacing. As always, it is important for customers to know that these remain a very small fraction of the reviews on Amazon and we introduced a review ranking system so that the most recent, helpful reviews appear first. The vast majority of reviews on Amazon are authentic, helping millions of customers make informed buying decisions every day.

The rules in this type of a case are fairly straightforward. Amazon has sellers agree to the following:

You may not intentionally manipulate your products’ rankings, including by offering an excessive number of free or discounted products, in exchange for a review. Review solicitations that ask for only positive reviews or that offer compensation are prohibited.

Furthermore, when sellers choose to break selling policies, they may find themselves without much recourse. The seller policies make it clear that any disputes or claims will be resolved by binding arbitration and won’t go to court and that each party waives their right to a trial.

 

So sellers take heed, if you want a good review, make sure your product/service earns it. To make sure that you are adhering to Amazon’s rules, read the full Participation Agreement in its entirety.

 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2014-10-10 05:29
FYI on the Dear Author Defense Fund and Keeping the Streisand Effect Going with Ellora’s Cave #notchilled

Last weekend I wrote a posted titled, The WTFckery Report: Ellora’s Cave Suing Dear Author Blog for Defamation. Why Book Bloggers Should Be Worried. Since that post, there has been some updates on this matter regarding a once admired and respected epublisher (Ellora’s Cave) suing a book blogger (Dear Author) for libel and malice because of this post: The Curious Case of Ellora’s Cave.

 

The Streisand effect has been in full force this week, and has grown. There is a new hashtag regarding the Ellora’s Cave/Dear Author lawsuit thanks to author, Courtney Milan. Courtney’s post, On Limited Public Figures #notchilled explains:

 

“I believe that this lawsuit was filed for the purpose of chilling speech–and for the purpose of chilling true speech about a matter of imminent public concern. And I think that despite the outpourings of support, it’s working. This lawsuit is about teaching authors to sit down and shut up, even if their livelihood is at stake. o I’m going to be tweeting harsh things about Ellora’s Cave that I believe to be true, and that I am confident will not be held defamatory under the limited public figure test because they are not made with actual malice. If they sue me, they sue me, and I’ll consider it money well spent.

 

I can’t give you legal advice about what to tweet. I can’t tell you that tweeting is safe and that it won’t harm you. But I’m going to be tweeting these things under the hashtag #notchilled–because I refuse to have legitimate speech about a matter of public concern chilled by a self-important bag of farts who happens to have access to a lawyer.”

 

Courtney, using the #notchilled invited people on twitter to do the same. Spread the word. Don’t be silenced.

 

People are not being silenced. Those who didn’t want to get involved initially are now speaking up, including Ellora’s Cave authors. Even those who aren’t fans of Dear Author or Jane are lending their support in big ways.

 

Jane is going to fight Ellora’s Cave, or rather I should say Tina Engler because Tina is the one of the parties responsible for the lawsuit, not Ellora’s Cave the entity as a whole, meaning the authors who publish there. The authors at Ellora’s Cave are collateral damage in all of this because regardless of how this turns out it’s very ugly for the EC authors. Knowing what you know now as a consumer/reader, would you buy Ellora’s Cave books in the future? What if all the readers who once supported Ellora’s Cave stop buying their books? You have your answer right there.

 

Recently two authors wrote posts about Ellora’s Cave. That should push those watching the outcome to not to stand back and remain silent or not care. One of Ellora’s Cave’s biggest authors, Lolita Lopez wrote a post on why she won’t finish the Grabbed Series because Ellora’s Cave owns the rights:

 

“…I’m going to take her at her word and assume that EC doesn’t want even more bad PR about lawsuits after the sh*t storm their current suit against Jane Litte at Dear Author has created. I’d like to think EC doesn’t want to add “sued mother of special needs child who uses her royalties to fund special needs trust that will keep autistic child with severe heart defects out of state run hell-holes after mommy dies” to their long list of PR flubs. I currently have four contracts on proposals for the next four books in the Grabbed series. These contracts provided no advance and have NO DELIVERY DATES on them. My contracts have a provision for termination for non-delivery so my attorney contacted EC and explained my reasons for wanting to terminate these contracts.

 

EC’s answer? No. But not just no. It was NO with an added:  we might consider a buy-out but the figure would be quite high and based on the “potential future income” of these books.

 

Now, let’s not even get started on how they would figure “potential future income” for books that do not even exist. How do they intend to value possible future sales for a constantly shifting market that EC clearly does not understand considering their Amazon sales have nose-dived when many of us have seen growth?

 

Most people know this, but for those who don’t:  We have a special needs child who had two major heart surgeries before six months of age. She then had belly and mouth surgery at 2. Last year, she was diagnosed with autism and had a heart failure scare. 2014 has been another year of high medical costs and scary moments.

 

Most of my royalties from the books I write as Roxie and Lo go into a special needs trust that will provide for her future. Every penny that I spend on legal fees, an audit of the EC books or trying to buy-out these contracts is a penny that doesn’t go into mutual funds or life insurance policies that will give the absolute light of my life a bright and happy future.”

 

Author, Ilona Andrews also wrote a post, urging people to lend their support:

 

“I know what it’s feels like to be defamed.  I am naturally sympathetic to anyone who feels their name have been smeared. EC is the Goliath.  It has more money and it can draw out the legal battle.  DA’s income is not nearly in the same league.  I can’t imagine their ad revenue covers much more than their expenses. For better or worse, our justice system is more friendly to people with money.  An average citizen with an average income can attempt to sue a large company, but even if their case has merit,  the party with the bigger purse often wins.  It’s not fair.  This case in  particular is a slippery slope.  What’s next?  Bloggers being sued for  negative reviews?  Authors being sued for speaking about the breach of their contract?”

 

How can someone support Jane and help her in her fight with Ellora’s Cave? Jane has to spend money out of her own pocket to the tune of $20,000 and perhaps more. There are a few ways you can do this.

 

A Dear Author Defense Fund has been set up by Sarah Wendell from Smart Bitches, Trashy Books on Go Fund Me. Donations started rolling in yesterday morning, and in 24 hours over $41,000 has been raised. If you can donate, not matter how small, please do.

 

A couple of key points:

 

Jane has set aside $20,000.00 of her own money for her defense, but that money will go quickly as the suit progresses.

 

Sarah is administering the fund through GoFundMe, and contributions can be anonymous. She will not reveal donor information. If the defense case can be completed for less than $20,000.00, we will attempt to refund donor money through GoFundMe’s refund options.

 

All funds, minus the fees charged by GoFundMe, will be used for Jane’s legal defense. Sarah is not being compensated for my role in setting up the fund. Any funds that are left over when the suit is finished will be donated to the Society of Professional Journalists Legal Defense Fund.

 

If you’re not comfortable donating through the Go Fun Me website you can you can send a contribution via Paypal to jane AT dear author DOT com. Please make sure to earmark the funds “Jane Litte/Dear Author Defense Fund.”

 

If you’d prefer not to use a credit card, please email Sarah at sarah AT smartbitchestrashybooks DOT com.

 

The site is here: http://www.gofundme.com/DA-DefenseFund. And if you like a good bitly link, here’s one: http://bit.ly/help-jane-fund

 

For those who can’t donate, you can help continue to spread the word (and slap aside any subtweets who are happy Jane is getting sued and use the word “karma” for what Jane is getting. For more about that WTFckery in itself, click here: Jenny Trout: Don’t Do This Ever and click here: Tez Says: Subtweeting)

 

 

Speak up. Spread the word. Don’t be silenced. Keep Not Chilled going strong.

 

 

Round Up of Websites and Blogs:

Tina Engler has no problem speaking up loudly as she did on the Passive Voice blog in a post titled: A Note About Confidentiality Clauses discussing Courtney Milan’s #notchilled post.

Tina Engler as Jaid Black has a new post titled: For the Silence Victims. She uses “Salem Witch Hunt” and “McCarthyism” to describe what is happening to her and Ellora’s Cave.

Melville House: Is Amazon Responsible for the Ellora’s Cave Fiasco

Angela Sparrow: Ellora’s Cave is in Breach of Contract

Cat Grant: Example of her Royalty Checks from Ellora’s Cave

S.J. Frost: Ellora’s Cave Refused To Give Me My Rights Back Twice

The Misfortune of Knowing: Beware: Anonymous Commenters & Those Who Seek to Unmask Them

All About Romance Weighs in on the Ellora’s Cave Suit against Dear Author

Jezebel: Erotic Romance Publisher Spins Torrid Tale of Defamation

Carolyn Jewel: The Flush Pile

Lisa Matthews: I’m an Ellora’s Cave Author

Source: kbgbabbles.com/2014/10/fyi-on-the-dear-author-defense-fund-and-keeping-the-streisand-effect-going-with-elloras-cave-notchilled.html
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2014-10-08 22:43
Ellora's Cave thanks Stop the Goodreads Bullies Blog for Their Support #notchilled

Screenshot for prosperity and the WTF factor.

 

 

 

Source: twitter.com/ellorascave/status/519917214133415936
More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?