A waste of good paper to print this crap.
The funny story is in the link of this Christian jerk giving his own book 5 stars review while many other readers give it one star.
A waste of good paper to print this crap.
The funny story is in the link of this Christian jerk giving his own book 5 stars review while many other readers give it one star.
What a jerk.
He got a NDE and tried to sell it off as religious.
What a load of crap.
His attitude is arrogant and he is full of shit.
Don't buy this book and give money to jerk.
How do a piece of crap like this get published? What a waste of tree.
This book is written by a Christian liar. Only a liar could managed to pretend that Christians majority are not enjoying special privileges, special rights and a whole lot of goodies.
What Christians are now getting less power to do, is to use their special religious eight to do harm. Christians are so used to be horrible to ither people they din't like, athiests, gays, Jews, women, and now the people being picked on are fighting back.
If Christians are modelling their behavior after Jesus, then Jesus must one mother fucking jerk.
life is too short to be wasted on horrible books. Skip this one and read something else.
I read somewhere that there are deal breakers when it comes to finding a blog to follow.
At first, I dismissed it as a non issue.
But then when I read a reviewers giving this piece of crap 4 stars and said it was informative. Inform about what? I know it is either a fake,or I am reading a global warming denier's blog.
Click to the link to see a long list of global change deniers who wrote crap books.
My feeling when I see that book is like....
Seriously.
While reading Richard Dawkins' new book, I learned of the word "flea".
Flea is a term to describe books written by jerk writers who try to get famous, or get rich, by attacking another famous writer.
So, this one is no exception.
In the linked article, the conclusion is right on the mark.
"What is left, once these attacks are dismissed, is a critique of Mr Dawkins's proselytising atheism. It is true this wins him few converts, when a collaboration with religious moderates against the creationists might bear weightier fruit. But if his intellectual rigour forbids him making common cause with people he thinks are wrong, that perhaps only shows he is indeed the rottweiler of legend."
What one learn from this book, is not to work with the publishing company that print this tree wasting crap.