Yet the abrupt departure of the man seen as an innovator in the global software industry has raised fresh questions over Indian corporate governance practices."There has clearly been a failure on the part of the board to get the company in the situation where it is now. His brief was to turn around a faltering business.

"The company has not publicly identified potential successors, though the interim chief executive Pravin Rao, CFO Ranganath D Mavinakere, deputy COO Ravi Kumar S and Mohit Joshi, the head of banking, financial and insurance services, are among the top internal candidates, according to the company source."There may be some people who get excited by these kinds of challenging situations," said a senior Infosys source.

"But anyone who is comfortable and doing well will think long and hard before taking this job.Staying onIn shower niche an unusual move, the board of Indias No. Mr Sikka, the eventual choice who was plucked from a top job at SAP, was the first chief appointed from outside the group of founders."The new boss will be taking on a company in better shape than it was in 2014: Mr Sikka has led efforts to diversify Infosys away from basic IT outsourcing services into more lucrative new areas, like cloud, automation and artificial intelligence.3 per cent in the period.

The apext court had asked BCCI to give an undertaking that they would comply with the SC appointed panel’s recommendations.The recommendations asked BCCI to appoint only three selectors. The apex court said that state tile backer board Factory associations will not get funds unless a resolution is passed to implement Justice Lodha committee reforms.On Friday, the Supreme Court came down hard on the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) for not falling in line with the recommendations made by the Lodha panel. However, the board failed to meet the deadline, and even went on to disregard some of the crucial points put forward by the Lodha panel, after a Special General Meeting (SGM) on October 1.Meanwhile, the apex court barred BCCI from releasing funds to state associations.The SC had originally given BCCI a deadline of September 30 to fall in line with the Lodha recommendations.The Supreme Court has postponed the hearing on the BCCI vs Lodha Committee matter till October 17.The re-election of Ajay Shirke as the board secretary, and the appointment of a five-member selection panel are a couple of points, which have turned out to be a bone of contention between the two parties.

SC also asked BCCI president Anurag Thakur to file a personal affidavit on the details of his conversation with ICC Chief regarding Lodha recommendations.The SC was expected to pronounce its order on Lodha panel’s suggestion to replace the entire top brass of the board by independent administrators, to bring in transparency in the cricket board. Mumbai: The Supreme Court has postponed the hearing on the BCCI vs Lodha Committee matter till October 17. Also, the board was advised to do away with the zonal selectors system in the men’s, women’s and the junior teams.Frustrated with the BCCI's constant defiance, the Lodha panel had also suggested that the entire top brass of the board be replaced by independent administrators, in order to facilitate the reforms.. However, the BCCI declined to provide an undertaking to the court, after which, SC said that it would give a ruling on the board, on Friday.According to the Lodha recommendations, BCCI was asked to do away with the current policy for the appointment of their five-member national selection panel.

Like the government, most board members feel that RBI should be “more transparent and accountable” for its decisions, said one source, who was also aware of discussions held subsequently within the government.”The worsening atmosphere between the government and the central bank fed speculation earlier this bathroom waterproof panel month that RBI governor Urjit Patel might consider resigning.Mumbai/For all the cordiality on show at the end of RBI’s last board meeting, tensions could re-surface when it next gathers on December 14 as the government aims to ramp up pressure for changes in the way the central bank operates.With a general election due by May, and voters concerned about weak farm incomes and whether enough jobs are being created, Mr Modi is keen to stimulate the economy and is looking for the RBI to allow easier lending policies. The memory of this significant assault on the autonomy of the central bank will last for a long time.

A majority of the 18-member board, now stacked with government nominees, intends to press for reduced curbs on lending and governance changes that would give the board more say, according to three sources with direct knowledge of what was said when the board last met on November 19. “This mainly includes governance at the central bank, the relationship between the board and the RBI and other related issues.Prior to the November meeting, senior officials in Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration had cranked up pressure, publicly and privately, on policy matters, raising fears among former central bankers that the RBI was at risk of losing independence.To speed along its transformation, the Centre has appointed experts from various fields, including accounting, technology and finance to the board.“The relationship between the RBI and the government is like a stretched rubber now,” said a former top RBI official.In the past, the board has acted as little more than an advisory body, but under the 1934 law that established the central bank it has the ability to possess real teeth and force policy change.“Once stretched the rubber will never return to its original size.“The next board will take up the agenda pending from the earlier two meetings,” a second source said.”.At its next meeting, it is likely to review how the central bank and the board engage, as well as the functioning of the sub-committees of the board, the sources said.

If it still persists, then the iPhone 7 unit should be subjected to audio diagnostics tests. However, every new patch brings with itself a set of new issues — iOS 11.The iOS 11. Even during other voice calls services or FaceTime, the microphone is kept disabled, which is creating an issue for affected users.Now, a report from MacRumors suggests that Apple is aware of the issue and has already directed its service centres to follow certain instructions to fix the issue. Affected devices will display a "device could not detect dock" or "accessory not supported" alert, in which case they can initiate a repair for the iPhone.3 update disables the microphone on iPhone 7 during a call, affected units will be repaired by Apple. During a call, the speaker button is greyed out, which means that the microphone is disabled Apple’s iOS 11 has been one of the most bug-ridden iOS releases in the recent times. During a call, the speaker button is greyed out, which means that the microphone is disabled. However, it’s not mentioned whether Apple will charge for the repairs, even for the units under warranty.3 has also affected another widely selling iPhone presently — the iPhone 7.

Apple Authorised Service Centres have been asked to unpair all connected Bluetooth headsets to see if the issue is fixed.The document obtained by MacRumors also says that all iPhone 7 units insulation boards Suppliers outside their warranties will also be considered for repairs.3 disabled the touchscreen on certain iPhone 8 units sporting third-party display panels. However, iOS 11. Since it’s release last September, Apple has been continuously fixing its mobile operating system with patches in subsequent fixes.Several iPhone 7 users are reportedly facing a weird issue that disables the ability to make calls. If your iPhone 7 is facing a similar issue, it is advisable to take your device to nearest service centre for getting it checked.

Many well known artists’ children are holding to ransom works if their coffers are not filled with whopping amounts of money before they sign on the dotted line.This is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. By that logic even poor Rembrandt will have no value!  It is sad to see how some people have had to sell perfectly good works at distress rates for no fault of theirs. Since it came into fashion, authentication is a stick that is driving the buying and selling or rather the non-buying and inability to sell works especially of dead artists. These are perfectly authentic works, often bought often directly from the artists themselves, or gifted by them to some in return for something – even money in times of dire straits, or a stay in a foreign land, bottles of rum over a period of time, many have come by way of inheritances, others still are available in the market with possible sellers but this stumbling block of the paper work has been daunting and holding up sales.It is not about the notional value of art hanging on the walls but its actual value that holds good only because a gallery is willing give its letter of authentication, or a trust, or the family. In some cases this is their money generation method.  There is nothing wrong with the works.

It is well-known in the art world how a former girl friend of well-known artist became a self-styled expert of his work painted even before she was born! She started giving out certificates of authentication and eventually had to be restrained through a court order.Several cases have come up when even families have been faking works in the name of the illustrious painter ancestor. Many works have been acquired many years ago when authentication was not in vogue. Many people who acquired works before the authentication bogey came into being have got them authenticated through such foundations so as to not leave unfinished business for their children. Why must be every work of an artist be seen as a possible fake?

A friend was trying to sell a renowned but dead artist’s inherited work came away most disgusted vacillating between feeling like a thief and feeling helplessly blackmailed!But what galleries and other players are unable to understand is when it comes to positioning, how will these masters be perceived in the international arena if the works are mired in unnecessary controversy? As I see it, the more logical and less partisan approach might be to set up authentication panels of experts by agencies like the Lalit Kala Akademi, National Gallery of Modern Art, Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, who can rightly advise both the buyer and sellers of the authenticity of works.Other situations have come to light where foundations have been set up in the artist’s name and those foundations have become the controlling element of authentication – rather like the sarkari committee style of functioning where the onus is put on the committee to ratify anything rather than one person taking the onus. In a this holding to ransom for the magical letter of authentication is having a huge impact on the art business of the old masters and even their positioning in the art market both in India and abroad.

The unsaid blackmail is the foundation will declare a work as fake if not gone their way. Checks and balances can be put in place with strict guidelines. Still others are running from pillar to post trying to get families to authenticate the works – in several cases the progeny have no idea if the works were indeed painted by their forefathers at all and yet have become custodians of authenticity. This way it is a win-win for all concerned – they get the right advice and assessment of the works at reasonable rates and don’t feel like gold diggers or blackmailed into buying expensive authentication certificates.It is common knowledge that most artists have muses/girl friends and those women have access to a certain amount of works and are happy to sell them but the problem arises when those muses start wanting to become the last word on a painter’s work and its authenticity.Several cases have come up when even families have been faking works in the name of the illustrious painter ancestor.

That of authentication of art works especially of deceased artists especially when Wholesale floor insulation they want or need to sell the works. Pictures used for representation only Of late I have been getting many queries from art buyers and people who are art investors – please notice that I am not calling them collectors – about a strange problem that they are encountering. It will also go a long way in curbing fakes from flooding the market.com. Still others are grappling with the situation and in a bid to contain fraudulent deals, brought in injunctions from the courts.The writer is an artist, art writer and curator and can be contacted at alkaraghuvanshi@yahoo. Money running into lakhs is demanded by these foundations to give the letter of authentication, almost like an extraction of their pound of flesh before the seller can make money