This digital document is an article from Stanford Law Review, published by Stanford Law School on January 1, 2010. The length of the article is 35361 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.From the author: One common theme links these elements together. Once it is recognized that patents and copyrights should be subject to limited terms, it becomes possible to transfer most of the legal principles from the physical to the intellectual realm. Far from being dead, a unified system of property rights for tangible and intangible assets could be brought to health by intelligent legislative and judicial action.Citation DetailsTitle: The disintegration of intellectual property? A classical liberal response to a premature obituary. (response to Thomas C. Grey, Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, vol. 69; Margaret Jane Radin, Columbia Law Review, vol. 88, p.1667; and Peter S. Menell, Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 34, p. 713)Author: Richard A. EpsteinPublication: Stanford Law Review (Magazine/Journal)Date: January 1, 2010Publisher: Stanford Law SchoolVolume: 62 Issue: 2 Page: 455(67)Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning