An informative history of combat medicine. I picked it up for the first few chapters on earlier historical time periods, but wound up reading the whole thing (admittedly, skimming some of the later chapters) because it’s pretty interesting. There’s something a little slapdash about it, such that I felt recognition rather than surprise on seeing that the author wrote 130 books and so presumably dashed this one off in a couple of months, but there’s still a lot of interesting detail and data. Laffin fought in WWII himself and displays a critical view of war and the way leaders and the public tend to ignore its human cost. But he’s also pretty old-school British Empire in that he doesn’t seem to see much problem with colonialism, and seems to view the British (and to a lesser extent, the French and Americans) as the only ones who mattered even when other countries’ combat medicine was ahead. Still, fairly useful reading if a bit gruesome in places.

Accordingly, to Global Market Insights research report In terms of the regional landscape, North America submarine combat system Market is projected to grow at 7% during the forecast timeframe. Majority of this growth can be associated with the presence of established defense manufacturers and industry players in the region. The region is anticipated to invest significantly in defense equipment to expand its range of weapon systems and acquire advanced technologies such as electronic warfare systems.

Modernization and replacement of existing submarine and naval fleets has been a key area of focus for government and defense organizations. In addition, growing deployment of next-generation submarine combat systems integrated with advanced navigation and surveillance systems will further bolster the industry outlook. Global Market Insights, Inc., estimates that global submarine combat systems market size will reach US$8 billion in valuation by 2026.

Request for a sample of this research report @ https://www.gminsights.com/request-sample/detail/3054

Torpedoes combat system industry will record a CAGR of 7% through 2026. Government and defense organizations worldwide have invested substantially in the procurement of advanced submarine combat systems over the past few years. Ongoing political insurgences between the U.S., China, Russia, India, Iran, and Saudi Arabia will boost the demand for advanced weapon systems, including torpedoes, to reinforce national security.

Companies operating in submarine combat system industry are constantly making research and development efforts to develop novel technologies. These industry participants also seek long-term collaboration opportunities with different government and defense organizations. In the defense sector, transaction usually happen through long-term contracts and agreements. Majority of these agreements are multi-year supply contracts that involve government and political parties. Geopolitical developments across major countries involved in defense contracts and partnerships will influence future combat system trends.

Companies operating in submarine combat system industry are constantly making research and development efforts to develop novel technologies. These industry participants also seek long-term collaboration opportunities with different government and defense organizations. In the defense sector, transaction usually happen through long-term contracts and agreements. Majority of these agreements are multi-year supply contracts that involve government and political parties. Geopolitical developments across major countries involved in defense contracts and partnerships will influence future combat system trends.  

Top key Player in submarine combat system Market Lockheed Martin Corporation, Atlas Elektronik GmbH, Thales Group, Saab AB, Raytheon Company, BAE Systems Plc, Kongsberg, Naval Group, Leonardo S.p.A, HAVELSAN Inc., Safran, General Dynamics, Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems

Make an inquiry for purchasing this report @   https://www.gminsights.com/inquiry-before-buying/3054

Table of Content (ToC)

Chapter 1.  Methodology & Scope

1.1. Methodology

1.1.1. Initial data exploration

1.1.2. Statistical model and forecast

1.1.3. Industry insights and validation

1.1.4. Scope

1.1.5. Definitions

1.1.6. Methodology & forecast parameters

1.2. Data Sources

1.2.1. Secondary

1.2.2. Primary

Chapter 2.  Executive Summary

2.1. Submarine combat system industry 360º synopsis, 2015 – 2026

2.1.1. Business trends

2.1.2. Regional trends

2.1.3. Submarine type trends

2.1.4. Weapon system trends

Chapter 3.  Submarine Combat System Industry Insights

3.1. Introduction

3.2. Industry segmentation

3.3. Industry landscape, 2015 – 2026

3.4. Market evolution

3.5. Industry ecosystem analysis

3.6. Technology & innovation landscape

3.6.1. Anti-Torpedo countermeasure

3.6.2. Supercavitation technology

3.7. Regulatory landscape

3.8. Industry impact forces

3.8.1. Growth drivers

3.8.1.1.   Increasing threats to national security supporting the market growth

3.8.1.2.   Increasing acquisition of submarines

3.8.1.3.   Rising investment in defense sector

3.8.1.4.   Upgradation of advanced weapon system

3.8.2. Industry pitfalls & challenges

3.8.2.1.   High cost associated with acquisition and upgradation of submarine combat systems

3.8.2.2.   Stringent government regulations limiting technology adoption

3.9. Growth potential analysis, 2019

3.10. Porter’s analysis

3.11. PESTEL analysis

About Global Market Insights

Global Market Insights, Inc., headquartered in Delaware, U.S., is a global Market research and consulting service provider; offering syndicated and custom research reports along with growth consulting services. Our business intelligence and industry research reports offer clients with penetrative insights and actionable Market data specially designed and presented to aid strategic decision making. These exhaustive reports are designed via a proprietary research methodology and are available for key industries such as chemicals, advanced materials, technology, renewable energy and biotechnology.

Contact Us:

Arun Hegde

Corporate Sales, USA

Global Market Insights, Inc.

Phone: 1-302-846-7766

Toll Free: 1-888-689-0688

Email: sales@gminsights.com

This had one of the tropes I really don't like and stay away from (secret baby- you can easily guess). However, in this book, it didn't bother and piss me off like it usually does. Charlie's motivations and secrecy made sense to me. She still took away a choice from Jon, but I still liked her. The plot line was relevant to today (right wing anti government sentiment and using arms to make the displeasure known and it was based in the West- which is something that has happened in this general area- see the Bundys and the occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge).
There were a few things that didn't make sense to me/just made me roll my eyes. One of suspects spouses was interviewed and she said something about how she doesn't know how to use their computer and they took her at her word (I got the impression that because she was an older woman she wouldn't know computers). Another one was how 30 yr olds having mad internet/computer skills because (you know) they grew up with it.
I did like this one. The main characters was interesting and likable.
I read this for Romance-opoly Soldier Street sun track

In this report, We covers the present scenario (with the base year being 2017) and the growth prospects of global Submarine Combat Systems market for 2018-2023.

“Increasing concern for maritime security due to maritime territorial disputes is the major driving factor in the submarine combat systems market globally”

Over the next five years,our projects that Submarine Combat Systems will register a xx% CAGR in terms of revenue, reach US$ xx million by 2023, from US$ xx million in 2017.

This report presents a comprehensive overview, market shares, and growth opportunities of Submarine Combat Systems market by product type, application, key manufacturers and key regions.

To calculate the market size, We considers value and volume generated from the sales of the following segments:

Segmentation by product type:

• Ssk
• Ssn
• Ssbn
• Ssgn 

Segmentation by application:

• Sensors
• Electronic Support Measures
• Armaments
• Torpedoes
• Cruise Missiles
• Ballistic Missile
• Mines

Submarine Combat Systems Market also splits the market by region:

• Americas
• United States
• Canada
• Mexico
• Brazil
• APAC
• China
• Japan
• Korea
• Southeast Asia
• India
• Australia
• Europe

The report also presents the market competition landscape and a corresponding detailed analysis of the major vendor/manufacturers in the market. The key manufacturers covered in this report:

• Lockheed Martin
• Saab
• General Dynamics
• Kongsberg
• Atlas Elektronik
• Bae Systems
• Raytheon
• Leonardo-Finmeccanica
• Havelsan

In addition, this report discusses the key drivers influencing market growth, opportunities, the challenges and the risks faced by key manufacturers and the market as a whole. It also analyzes key emerging trends and their impact on present and future development.

Research objectives

• To study and analyze the global Submarine Combat Systems consumption (value & volume) by key regions/countries, product type and application, history data from 2013 to 2017, and forecast to 2023.
• To understand the structure of Submarine Combat Systems market by identifying its various subsegments.
• Focuses on the key global Submarine Combat Systems manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competition landscape, SWOT analysis and development plans in next few years.
• To analyze the Submarine Combat Systems with respect to individual growth trends, future prospects, and their contribution to the total market.
• To share detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks).
• To project the consumption of Submarine Combat Systems submarkets, with respect to key regions (along with their respective key countries).
• To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
• To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.

CONTACT US:
276 5th Avenue, New York , NY 10001,United States
International: (+1) 646 781 7170
Fax: (+1) 212 634 4885
Email: help@24marketreports.com

Follow Us On linkedin :- https://www.linkedin.com/company/24-market-reports

During the eight years of its engagement in the Vietnam War, the airpower of the United States was involved in a bifurcated conflict. In the south American warplanes enjoyed an uncontested dominance of the skies, which they used to deploy American resources to surveil and attack the enemy. Air Force and Navy planes entering North Vietnam airspace, however, found themselves in a much different situation, as they faced an air defense network that grew increasingly sophisticated as the war went on. In his book Marshall Michel analyzes the air war fought over the skies of North Vietnam, detailing its twists and turns as both sides sought an advantage in a key front in the conflict.

As Michel notes, given the tactics and technology employed, the air war in North Vietnam "was the one area of the Vietnam War that has military significance in the global balance of power." There both sides deployed planes and weapons designed for a potential war in Europe between the Soviet Union and NATO. For the United States Air Force, this meant using F-105 fighter-bombers designed to strike their enemies quickly, relying upon speed for protection. Armed with heart-seeking and radar-guided missiles, they were designed without cannons in the belief that, in the new age of missiles, dogfighting was obsolete. This was soon proved mistaken, as the smaller and more agile MiG-17s posed a challenge for which the F-105s were poorly equipped. Armed with cannons as well as missiles the Navy's F-8s proved much more capable of meeting the threat, though their pilots were also frustrated by technical problems with the missiles and rules requiring visual confirmation before attacking, which often inhibited the ability to launch their weapons.

As the war went on, all sides adapted in response to what they learned. For the North Vietnamese, this involved developing an elaborate ground control interception (GCI) system that employed both North Vietnamese fighters and growing numbers of anti-air cannons and missiles. While both the Air Force and the Navy sought improved weapons and supporting technology, the Air Force's exclusive reliance on technical fixes contrasted with the Navy, which in 1968 established the Topgun School in an effort to improve dogfighting abilities. New aircraft were also introduced — the F-4 for the U.S., the MiG-21 for the North Vietnamese — which also represented an escalation in ability prior to the termination of the North Vietnamese bombing campaign by President Lyndon Johnson in March 1968.

When Johnson's successor Richard Nixon resumed the bombing in North Vietnam in 1972, the new lessons were employed in full. The Air Force found themselves launching ever-larger missions to bomb tough North Vietnamese targets, while North Vietnamese pilots adopted new tactics to contest control of the air. By now the superiority of the Navy's approach was becoming more indisputable, reflected as it was in the superior kill ratios of North Vietnamese places to their Air Force counterparts. As a result, once the war ended in 1973 the Air Force moved to establish their own Weapons School to teach the hard-won lessons of the now-concluded conflict and employ them to secure American air superiority in future wars.

As a former F-4 pilot who flew in Vietnam, Michel brings a firsthand familiarity to his subject. This he uses to interpret the mass of staff reports, expert assessments, and personal narratives that he draws upon to detail the various airborne engagements that defined the war. His is a dispassionate approach that favors analysis over dramatic narrative, yet his book engages the reader with its clearheaded insights and perceptive conclusions. While it suffers from the lopsided nature of his coverage favoring the Americans (understandable, given the relative inaccessibility of North Vietnamese records), this is nonetheless the best history of its subject, one that explains the hows and whys of the air war in North Vietnam better than every other book out there.