Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: Gothic-Romance
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review SPOILER ALERT! 2019-06-21 20:28
This book would never have made it out of a critique group
The Hounds of Carvello - Frances Cowen The Hounds of Carvello - Frances Cowen

Disclosure:  I own a very battered, tattered paperback copy of this book, obtained years ago from an unknown source.  I do not know the author nor have I ever had any communication with her about this book or any other matter.  I am an author of historical romance and contemporary gothic romance, as well as various and sundry non-fiction.


Lots of spoilers, but I don't think anyone here is ever really going to hunt up this book to read it.  It's not as ridiculous as Fog Island Horror, but it's not very good.


Half a star because it's not totally offensive.


The Hounds of Carvello had very little to do with this story, but they're in the title, there is a dog in the book, and there is a legend about the historical hounds, so I'm letting this qualify for my BookLikes-opoly post, which I've forgotten the details of and will update later.  I just know it had to have something to do with dogs, and this book was in the pile of old gothics, so I read it.


The plot is nonsensical, and both the main female character and her predecessor are TSTL.  Maybe the publication date of 1970 suggests the publishers were desperate for romance novels -- both traditional gothics and Harlequin Romance were very popular -- but this book in its manuscript form would never have survived any of the critique groups I've ever been in.


Young Englishwoman Ann Mannering has been governess to the children of a rich and powerful Italian for 18 months.  She has become frightened of something, so she breaks her two-year contract with the Carvello family and plans to return to England.  But she offers her young, recently widowed cousin to take her place!


Okay, wait a minute.  Ann's afraid of something so dire that she's willing to break her employment contract, but it's okay to put her cousin in the same danger?  Um, no.


The explanation given is that since Harriet Newcombe, the cousin, doesn't speak Italian, she'll be fine.  Say, what?


So Harriet, who is well aware of her own beauty, hies off to the Italian countryside to teach the seven-year-old twins, Carlo and Isabella, of the Marchese and Marchesa of Carvello.  Their Palazzo -- yes, it's always capitalized -- is almost as big as Blenheim and larger than Castle Howard.  The Marchesa is an American, so she speaks English, and the two kids do well, too.  They referto their mother sometimes as Momma, sometimes Mom, sometimes Mommie, and maybe even Mommy, but I'm not going to look to confirm that.


The Marchese has a younger brother, Niccolo.  He's Harriet's love interest, but unlike in most gothics, he never comes across as menacing.  The other potential, American Mark Rathner, is much older (40s) and never becomes a serious contender.


Within a day or so of Harriet's arrival, she learns her cousin Ann never arrived back in England.  Well, of course, Ann has been murdered but it's all covered up.  Harriet's father -- who is Ann's uncle -- comes to Italy to collect Ann's body, and he begs Harriet to come back with him.


She refuses.


Of course, she does, because she's already in love with Niccolo.  So much so that she's going to defy common sense.  Of course.


She's also determined to find out what really happened to Ann.  Except through the course of the book she never makes the slightest effort to do so.  And indeed, neither does the author!  The book ends, and we don't have any idea what happened to Ann!


The actual hounds of Carvello are a legend, but there is real dog in the story, sort of. Enough to make this count for the game, I think.


The plot is dumb, but the writing is dumber. I don't know who edited this thing, but they really needed to go back to basics.


I can overlook the unnecessary capitalization of Palazzo, Summer, Uncle (when not part of a personal name), and so on.  But why is the head of the household staff referred to as the Major Domo?


Some of the errors are simply typos, like the La Scale opera house or the ancient Italian noble families the Sforsis and E'estes.  Typos don't explain the varied use of Contessa, Comtesse, Comtess, and Comptesse for the title of a minor character.  The repeated use of "condittiori" instead of the correct Condottieri made me want to hurl the book against the wall.  (These are things you learn from reading books like Prince of Foxes and Lord Vanity.  Thank you, Samuel Shellabarger!)


But there were other writing flubs that just made no sense.


She went to her bedroom, undressed, then took a bath in the deep shallow bath off the suite, she used the salts there, accepted the luxury.  (p. 124)

In another scene, she's writing a letter to her mother back in England, describing the preparations for a Royal visit to the Palazzo:


She was expiating on these preparations when there was a sharp knock on the door.  (p.144)


As for that Royal visit, there are frequent references to the Prince, but what he's Prince of is never identified.


All in all, it was a really disappointing read, but I pushed through because it was 208 pages for the game.





Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2019-06-14 21:39
When you're really and truly bored
The Cottage at Avalanche - June Wetherell

Disclosure:  I owned a very badly deteriorated paperback edition of this book.  I do not know the author nor have I ever had any communication with her about this book or any other matter.  I am an author of historical romance, contemporary gothic romance, and a bunch of other shit.


My life the past two weeks has been taken up with insurance matters pertaining to the wind and hail damage done to my house.  I've been calling contractors, meeting with contractors, examining damage, and so on.  I needed a break.  A mindless break of mindless fluff.


The Cottage at Avalanche was just such a break.  Mindless.  Fluff.


Though marketed as a gothic, it's really more a straight mystery/suspense. 


In the summer of 1941, young Connie Darien leaves San Francisco to head to the mountains of Washington, where her two elderly aunts live.  She's been unable to make a living on her own since a family tragedy, so Ruth and Nell McKay are her only hope.


The sisters live in an old cottage just outside the small town of Avalanche, in the ski country of the Cascade Mountains east of Seattle.  On the way to Avalanche, Connie meets Hank Whittemore, who works at the local ski resort.


The McKay sisters are eccentric, Nell the elder being more stern while Ruth displays flashes of humor and kindness.  But of course not all is as it seems.


There's a local legend of a fabulous cave, which one of the guests at the lodge would love to make the center of a tourist attraction.  The entrance to the cave, however, was lost when the avalanche that gave the town its name plowed down the mountainside.


Connie's mother died in an accident when Connie was just a baby, so she's trying to get back to something of her roots as well.  What she discovers is a lot of mystery.


Everything abut the book is pretty predictable, right down to which of the three possible suitors will eventually prevail over the others, who will be the villain, and the whole secret of Connie's ancestry.  The writing is decent, if nothing out of the ordinary, and all in all it was exactly what I needed -- mindless fluff.


Though copyrighted 1972, The Cottage at Avalanche read like an older book, maybe from the 1940s or '50s.  There was a lot of cigarette smoking going on, which would have been normal for the time period of the 1940s, but maybe not if the book had been written after the Surgeon General's warnings started appearing on cigarettes in the 1960s.  And there were a lot of references to popular culture of the 1930s -- music, films, radio programs -- that were reasonably familiar to an oldster like me but might not be to today's younger readers.


Connie Darien was a bit on the TSTL side, often talking when any sensible person would have kept her mouth shut, and more than a little bit gullible.  Again, that character type seemed more suited to an era before 1972.


Not really recommended, but it was okay and served its purpose.


Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2019-04-07 04:19
My reading plan for the week: 4/7/19
Silverhill - Phyllis A. Whitney
Double Sin and Other Stories - Agatha Christie
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd - Agatha Christie
Cyanide With Compliments (Pollard & Toye #5) - Elizabeth Lemarchand
Murder on the Nile - Agatha Christie
The Yellow Dog - Georges Simenon,Linda Asher
Going Wrong - Ruth Rendell

I have a big mystery week planned!


I'm going to finish Silverhill by Phyllis Whitney tomorrow, and I only have three stories left in Double Sin. From there, I will move onto a reread of The Murder of Roger Ackroyd (yay) and the buddy read of Murder on the Nile, which takes place on Tuesday. 


I've also broken down and bought The Yellow Dog, which is the 6th Maigret, and - according to Tigus - is a good one! I am excited to read it. It should arrive tomorrow.


Last - but surely not least - is Cyanide and Compliments, which is the 5th in the Pollard and Toye series. This series is available through KU, and I've read the first 4 in a couple of weeks. They are silver age, first published in the 1960s, and are a lot of fun.


That's probably enough for a week, right? But if I make it through all of those, I'm going to read Going Wrong by Ruth Rendell, because I need a little psychological suspense in my life.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2019-04-07 00:51
Reading progress update: I've read 10%.
Silverhill - Phyllis A. Whitney

I've been looking forward to sinking into a Phyllis Whitney, and this one is showing a lot of promise, with a plucky, scarred heroine with an explicable fear of caged birds, and a family mansion full of secrets in New Hampshire.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review SPOILER ALERT! 2018-12-29 20:58
Window on the Square -- Don't look too closely. There are too many holes
Window on the Square - Phyllis A. Whitney

I started out rating this 2.5 stars, then dropped it back to 2.0.  As a book to while away a few hours, it's fine.  It's a good page-turner, with multiple entwined mysteries, and I didn't see any obvious give-aways in terms of the ultimate revelation.


The ultimate revelation itself, however, is a bit of a let-down.  While not unexpected, it doesn't really mesh with the characters as they're presented.  So the following is going to be filled with spoilers.  If you want to pick this up, the Open Road Media edition for Kindle is currently $2.99, and there's a 3-book set with Thunder Heights and The Golden Unicorn for $3.99.


The rest of this very long review is pretty much spoilers, so consider yourself warned!


It's important to have a detailed summary of the action in order to see how all the tropes work as well as how the ending is set up.


Setting is 1870s New York City, Washington Square to be precise.  There's a bit of local description and a few bits and pieces of contemporary history, but not much.  Certainly not enough to make anyone running to Google to check out the accuracy.


Young Megan Kincaid has recently lost her mother and younger brother in an accident.  Her father, a professor at Princeton in New Jersey, was killed in the Civil War,  Her brother Richard was apparently developmentally disabled.  The book was published in 1962, so there isn't a whole lot of emphasis placed on Richard's condition.


Megan is the classic impoverished, innocent, idealistic young woman, the archetypal gothic heroine.


Megan's mother was a successful seamstress, and now Megan proposes to make her own living the same way, though she's not nearly as skilled.  She receives a summons to the home of Brandon and Leslie Reid, ostensibly to sew a frock for Leslie's daughter Selina.  But her other job, and the real reason she was hired, is to care for Selina's brother, Jeremy.  They are respectively eight and nine -- or seven and eight -- years of age.  I forget precisely how old they are.


Jeremy is withdrawn and moody, the result of having accidentally killed his father, Daniel Reid, two years before.  Selina is boisterous and spoiled.  Jeremy is blamed for everything; Selina gets away with everything.


Jeremy and Selina are the classic vulnerable orphans, for whom the heroine will sacrifice anything and everything, including her reputation and her life, if necessary.


Leslie Reid is the gorgeous widow who married her late husband's older brother within a year of Daniel's death.  She is fragile, often in poor health, but always beautiful.  She dotes on Selina, but seems to have no feeling for Jeremy at all.  She appears, however, to be devoted to the memory of her late husband.  Daniel was some kind of crusader in the days of political corruption.


Leslie is the archetype of the beautiful "other woman" who stands between the innocent heroine and at least one of the men put forward as her Happy Ever After.


Brandon Reid is Leslie's second husband, older brother of her first.  He is dark, handsome, worldly, powerful.  He explains to Megan that she is not just a seamstress; she is a kind of supra-governess, who will be living in the Reid home to try to bring Jeremy out of his emotional lockdown.


Brandon Reid is the classic gothic "hero."


Thora Garth was Leslie's childhood nurse, and is now governess to Selina and Jeremy.  She is devoted to Leslie and, by extension to Selina, but she hates Jeremy, considers him evil and wicked.  She makes no attempt to hide her hatred and calls him out frequently.


But Thora has another side.  Fairly early on, Megan discovers that Garth (as she is most often called) has a habit of sneaking into Leslie's room when the mistress of the house is out.  Garth dons Leslie's gowns, bathes herself in Leslie's perfumes, and gazes with deep longing at the miniature portraits of both Daniel and Brandon Reid.  Garth quickly develops an open animosity toward Megan.


Thora Garth is the classic nurse/governess protector of the delicate "other woman," who manifests symptoms of irrationality and/or insanity as a threat to the innocent heroine.


Andrew Beach is the children's tutor.  He comes to the house in the mornings to teach Selina and Jeremy.  He is also something of an artist, who sketches portraits of important people,which are then published in the newspapers.  Leslie Reid has noticed his talent and has asked him to paint a portrait of her with Selina. 


As a relatively well-educated, working-class man, Andrew is the classic counter to the wealthy Brandon Reid and a challenger for Megan's affections.


Kate, Henry, and Fuller are three of the Reid family servants, respectively the maid, butler, and coachman.  Kate quickly befriends Megan, though Henry remains aloof.


More important than the servants, however, are a couple of inanimate objects that are introduced early in the book with that kind of ominous foreshadowing of dark events to come.


One is a music box carrousel -- Whitney's misspelling drove me nuts through the whole book -- that Megan had given to her brother Richard as a gift.  This is her Most Precious Possession, given much more emotional value even than the few pieces of nice jewelry she has inherited from her mother.


The second is a carved head of the Egyptian god Osiris which occupies a place of some honor in Brandon Reid's library.  Prior to his brother Daniel's death Brandon was an (amateur?) archaeologist in Egypt.


Slowly, Megan works her way into Jeremy's affections and begins to break through his shell.  At first she is told he accidentally shot his father, but then she's told he did it deliberately.  But Jeremy doesn't completely remember what happened.  He insists there was another gun involved, that he did indeed have a gun, but it was unloaded and it disappeared after the shooting, to be replaced by the one that actually killed his father.


She also becomes more and more friendly with Andrew Beach, who warns her to get away from the Reid family.  This is the classic gothic romance trope of the kind, attractive, but slightly less desirable potential love interest.  Megan even goes on a "date" with him, to a cute little Italian restaurant.


She also goes on a "date" with Brandon Reid, taking the children to a theatre matinee.  It ends badly, because Brandon is moody and can't seem to control his emotions.


Later, they have another "date," of sorts, taking the children skating.  Now the relationship between Megan and Brandon is becoming more romantic, more threatening.


A series of events around the Christmas holidays starts to bring issues to a head.  Jeremy begins to make an elaborate gift for his uncle/stepfather, a beaded collar in an Egyptian style to decorate the Osiris head in Brandon's library.  Megan provides the beads; Andrew Beach obtains some fine wire for stringing the beads.


This co-operative effort strengthens the connection between Megan and Andrew over the issue of Jeremy, and reinforces the rivalry between Brandon Reid and Andrew for Megan's affections.


Leslie, Selina, and Garth takea trip up the Hudson River to visit Leslie's parents for several days.  While they are gone, Megan and Jeremy have a "date" of their own, a dinner party at the Reid house jsut for the two of them.  They dress up, have all the servants participate in preparing the dinner, and it's all going to be fun.  Then Brandon comes home, and things get messy.  There's now a sort of declaration of love, and then threats are made.


Megan must leave.  Leslie fires her, Garth threatens her, but Brandon insists she stay.  Her affection for Jeremy, and her sense of responsibility toward him, now override her better judgment.  She agrees to stay.


Christmas arrives, and Brandon gives Megan an Egyptian scarab brooch as a token of his affection.  Their romance is doomed, of course.  Megan gives Jeremy the precious carrousel music box, which is also doomed, of course.  Jeremy gives Brandon the beaded collar for the Osiris statue, and Brandon is delighted with it.  This means the Osiris is also doomed.


While all this is going on, Selina keeps chirping up with declarations of having a secret that she's not going to share with anyone.


But then there's a confrontation between Jeremy and Brandon over the music box, and Brandon in a fit of temper sweeps the toy aside and breaks it.  Jeremy is heartbroken, but also blames himself.  Surprisingly, though, Megan doesn't seem to be terribly affected by the damage.  And that's where things really began to fall apart for me.


A few days later, a gunshot in the house sort of wakens everyone.  But no one is hurt; the victim is the Osiris statue.  So another Precious Possession is destroyed.


Someone is out to get Brandon and Megan, and possibly Jeremy, too.  Garth insists the boy be put away, blaming him for shooting the statue, even though he remembers nothing of it.  Brandon believes, too, that Jeremy can no longer be allowed in the house, and though he intends to find a better place for the boy, he agrees that makinghim an inmate of some asylum is the only option.


Megan, with no evidence to the contrary, believes something else is going on.  She alone has faith in Jeremy.


The exact order of events leading up to the conclusion isn't entirely important, but it reveals the weakness in how Whitney resolves all the little mysteries.


Selina reveals her secret: She knows where the other gun from her father's killing is, the gun her brother insisted he had checked to make sure it wasn't loaded and therefore he couldn't have killed his father.  I just didn't buy that Selina, at age seven or eight, would think this was a fun secret to tease everyone with.  Though very different in temperament, she and Jeremy did have a close relationship.  And the fact that this gun was hidden meant something nefarious was going on.


The gun is hidden in a heavy candlestick belonging to Leslie,  That Selina, who was very close to her mother, would have bragged about knowing this also didn't seem to make sense.


And then Leslie is murdered, beaten to death with the aforementioned candlestick.  Evidence emerges implicating Brandon, even though he is out of the house at the time of the murder.




Well, of course, Brandon didn't kill her.  Neither did the children.  Neither did Thora Garth.  Neither did the servants.  Neither did Megan.  Neither did Andrew Beach.


As Andrew reveals to the police, Leslie killed herself.




Not only did I not buy Leslie's suicide-by-overdose-of-laudanum, but I didn't buy the rest of her scenario.  Yes, it's somewhat similar to the conclusion of DuMaurier's Rebecca, but the character of Rebecca de Winter was entirely different.


According to Andrew Beach's version, Leslie took the overdose and then told him what to do so her death would be blamed on Brandon.  After she died, Andrew proceeded to bludgeon her corpse with the candlestick, while wearing one of Brandon's shirts so there would be blood on it.  Then he was to wash in Brandon's basin, to make sure there were traces of blood there, too.


Andrew did all this because he was in love with Leslie.  Somehow or other I just couldn't see him bludgeoning the dead body of the woman he loved in order to frame someone else.  Andrew didn't come across as that kind of person.  He may have been jealous of Brandon for having been Lesllie's husband, and for having won Megan's heart as well, but Andrew was never portrayed as being a bad person.


But why would Leslie kill herself anyway?  Well, apparently it was because she was going to be found out to be her first husband's real killer.  Jeremy hadn't been believed at the time of the killing that there was another weapon, bu now Selina had found it and Jeremy's version would be believed.


At which point in the telling, Jeremy remembers -- I think he remembers -- that the person who fired the gun that killed Daniel Reid was in fact Jeremy's mother.  I'm not sure why Jeremy didn't remember this at the time, or why no one believed him, or how the other gun got removed from the scene.


Why did all this go down?  Oh, because Lesllie's parents were in financial trouble so she married wealthy Daniel even though she was already really in love with Brandon.  But then Daniel got mixed up in dirty politics and she didn't want to see her posh future destroyed, so she killed him. 


And Brandon married her to keep her quiet about the political scandal to save his family's reputation.  I didn't buy that, either.  He was an archaeologist, for crying out loud.  He would have been obsessed with the truth.  He would have wanted to know, at all costs, not just hush it up and forget about it.


Plus, he was willing to let Jeremy take the blame.


At the beginning of the book, I had some sympathy for Brandon, but it didn't last long.  He gave in to his lust for Megan even though he had married Leslie to save the family reputation.  That kind of man wouldn't easily set aside his scruples.  Nor would he, as the book went on, contemplate ending the marriage dishonorably.  His mood swings weren't suitable for heroism either.


At the end, when it's all been sorted out, Megan and Brandon are going to go to Egypt, and leave the children with their maternal grandparents. No.  No way.  After all the children have been through after all that Megan has been through fighting for Jeremy, there is no way I can accept Megan and Brandon abandoning them to the parents of the woman who killed their father and his brother.


Besides, how did Leslie's parents recoup their supposed financial losses?  How are they going to be able to take care of two small children?  Selina liked her grandparents, but I'm not sure about Jeremy. 


Overall, I thought it was a really crappy ending, partly for just being crappy but also for not being particularly believable.  Andrew Beach wouldn't have done that to Leslie and to Brandon, and by extension to Megan.  Andrew wasn't a bad guy.  But I also didn't see Leslie as the kind to take the suicide route and beg to be mutilated after death.  Just didn't make sense.


The worst, though, was Megan walking off to Egypt and abandoning the boy she had worked so hard to save.  That alone made Window on the Square just a tiny bit shy of wallbanger status.


The writing was fine, and most of what led up to the ending was fine but that ending pretty much ruined it all.  Not as bad as The Thorn Birds, but bad.  Down to 1.5 stars.

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?