Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: bookclub-2016
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2016-06-24 02:27
what happens when a group discusses a book about women? mansplaining!
Nine Parts of Desire: The Hidden World of Islamic Women - Geraldine Brooks

I read this as part of a bookclub discussion. The book was selected by a lovely woman who fled Iran 24 years ago, and had lived through the revolution, war and economic sanctions against her country. She said she started reading it a year ago but it was just too emotional and so she thought with the support of the bookclub she could get through it. I was grateful for her choice as this was interesting, informative and a unique perspective on the topic. Instead of a classic 'book report' I have decided to share the bookclub discussion experience.


So, the group met yesterday evening, 9 women and 5 men. The group on the whole is well educated, well informed, well read and generally progressive. After everyone has takes a turn to give their impression of the book, open discussion follows. And guess what followed? MANSPLAINING! The book was about women in Islamic middle eastern cultures, told through very personal stories. Some were positive, but many very illustrative of how women are subjugated, abused and repressed. While political and economic policy are relevant to such a book, this wasn't a book about politics or policy. Nevertheless, a subset of the men in the room hijacked the discussion into that. When the woman from Iran (who lived through the revolution) explained that Iranian revolution in 1979 was not entirely rooted in the rise Islamic fundamentalism, she was corrected. When she described the economic disparity in Iran (no middle class) she was corrected. When I brought up my opinion that it's not the Islamic faith that leads to repression of women, but rather patriarchal cultural practices, I was corrected. The irony of the whole situation was not lost on me, nor was it lost on many of the other women in the room.

To be fair, these men aren't misogynists and they are probably sympathetic to feminist causes. But they have also been raised to be more assertive and are better skilled at inserting their opinions into the discussion. They may not consciously discount a woman' s opinion, but they probably are oblivious to their subconscious biases. Even in 'so called' enlightened western culture, in one of the most liberal cities in America, you can find micro aggressions against women in the context of a book discussion about the oppression of Islamic women. ¯_(ツ)_/¯


Now, turn a subconscious bias against women into one that is culturally sanctioned through religious interpretation and you have the plight of many many Islamic women in the Middle East. Even though this book is 20+ years old and not without flaws, it is informative a worth a read.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2016-04-18 07:57
good journalism turned into good reading
Ghettoside: A True Story of Murder in America - Jill Leovy
Maddeningly good and an excellent example of good journalism transformed into a very good book.
Not always the case as I found in this example https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1567538899
(spoiler show)

Having lived through the LA riots in 1992, this hits home. These detectives are unsung heroes and it's slightly embarrassing to learn that their work bears little resemblance to their literary counterparts found in popular fiction. I felt outrage at the dearth of resources available to them, especially when the Los Angeles seemed to give birth to the 'militarization' of police forces with such gems as this battering ram. Oddly enough, Daryl Gates is conspicuously absent from these pages. Even though Daryl Gates was long gone before the setting depicted in Ghettoside, law enforcement public relations still was important. Crime prevention was priority, solving crimes that were isolated to marginalized groups clearly was not.

A couple of years ago, I read an interesting book that examined the sociological/anthropological roots of violence where most things boiled down to "team aggression against an outgroup". If that doesn't sound like gang warfare, I don't know what does. While Ghettoside cites the root of the problem, it doesn't make it the agenda. Rather, she basically stipulates it as a given for the time and place being presented and uses it to present the heartbreaking story.


More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?