She was at a temple with him - Lord Archias who had killed her favorite musician.He tries to make her go with him to the archbishop after he was done sincerely praying for forgiveness. But then she lets him see who she really is and he now knows she is the Goddess Artemis - the Lady Of The Moon, The Queen of Laughter and it was her temple they had went to. She then leaves and sees her brother Pol and she asks him to by her dinner for her not to tell his wife he was done on earth and having sex with mortal women.Pol and his wife already didn’t get along. Artemis father intervened for Lord Archias so Artemis makes up a near impossible task to save Lord Archias. The task is to return the musician from the land of the dead.

I just could not get into this story . I tried but it just didn’t do anything for me. Also it talks alot of the mischief of the Gods that other stories have already told. The task was to be near to impossible that's not new either . I just didn’t enjoy this.

I received an ARC of this story for an honest review.

Downfall of the Gods is a novella which attempts to be a clever and witty portrayal of the antics of a pantheon of gods; a pantheon which is very similar to the ancient Greco-Roman deities. No, the divine names are not the same as in the Greek myths, but it is fairly obvious who each divinity is here: their child-like petulance, mind-numbing mischief, and bipolar personalities giving them away. But while many immortal beings strut across the stage, the real star of this show is the musings of one goddess, detailing her philosophical journey of discovery regarding religion.

Artemis . . . (Ahh. Well, she isn’t ever called Artemis, but that is who she appears to be, so I’m going to call her that.) So, anyway, Artemis begins this story by walking into her temple after a long, hard day of being a prostitute and finds that a rather important member of her divine flock is prostrating himself before her huge statue, begging for forgiveness. It seems he has plotted and killed his close friend, who slept with his wife and constantly mistreated him, but now he has truly repented of his evil deed, wishes he could take it back and is begging for forgiveness. There is a problem: Artemis has no intention of forgiving him, because the murdered individual was her favorite musician!

Actually, I misspoke, because there is another, even more pressing, problem. You see, no matter her divinity, Artemis has rules she must abide by. Divine covenants forged between the gods and their human followers that provide for forgiveness upon repentance. And no god or goddess is above these rules, which is why Artemis is soon summoned before her father!

Needless to say, daddy Zeus isn’t happy with his headstrong daughter. Their discussion (and Artemis’ inner monologues) detailing what is expected of her, the serious drawbacks of godhood and the rather uselessness (at least, in Artemis’ eyes) of mankind’s devotion to god(s) in the first place.

Eventually, however, (after much philosophical arguments) a compromise between Zeus and Artemis is brokered: the goddess agreeing to grant forgiveness to her follower IF he completes a quest to the halls of the dead and brings back his victim’s soul. A journey which Artemis will accompany him on, providing her divine guidance and support — whenever she feels like it.

Thereafter, the tale zigs and zags between Artemis’s interactions with her divine family (Who appear to be about as worthless as she continues says they are.) and her human follower (Who is about as blindly devoted to her as anyone could be.) Each scene serving more to provide reasons to pontificate on the ridiculous of religion than to actually create a compelling narrative or develop realistic characters. In fact, nothing terribly exciting happening throughout (other than philosophical musings on religion) until the rather ironic ending is sprung like a mouse trap upon the unsuspecting (or, should I say, the suspecting) audience.

If one was to look for strengths and weakness in this novella, the strength would undoubtedly be the goddess character herself. She is a very fitting, well-crafted narrator, who muses upon and bitches about religion, faith, and the inherent limitations of any divinity upon the fate of the world. And through the uncovering of her personal inadequacies and her ridiculous arguments, the story develops from a rather quest oriented tale to a full blown religious satire, or religious parody, which does its best to encompass all religions in its virulent mockery.

As for the weakness, it would be the fact that this is a religious parody. Whether you are a believer in some form of religion or not, no doubt, we can all concede that the exercise of faith is a very personal experience which people become very attached to and do not enjoy being ridiculed. Anytime a person makes light of, mocks, or labels a person of religious belief as ignorant or illogical for feeling a certain way, I personally find it in poor taste. It really is the same as telling a joke about minorities or same sex couples or over weight people or anyone else, and to me, it isn’t clever or witty or funny in the least. And here, the author spends over a hundred pages making arguments regarding the idiocy of religion; every epiphany of the characters further espousing the useless of god(s) and the need for mankind to cast aside such illogical beliefs in divinities. Perhaps some part of the narrative in this vein could be understood, but after finishing this novella, I felt as if I’d spent an hour reading a sermon for atheism rather than a fantasy story.


All in all, Downfall of the Gods is a fine read IF you undertake it understanding what it is. This is a religious satire, a religious parody, which definitely has an agenda to cast religion in all its myriad forms as illogical, adolescent, and ridiculous. Nothing wrong with that as long as you agree with that form of discrimination. If, however, you — like me — are searching for a rousing fantasy adventure story to excite and awe you, then this one is probably something you should skip.

I received this book from Subterranean Press and Netgalley in exchange for a fair and honest review. I’d like to thank both of them for allowing me to receive this review copy and inform everyone that the review you have read is my opinion alone.

Downfall of the Gods

by K.J. Parker

Tom Holt/KJ Parker reminds me quite a lot of early Terry Pratchett: an amusing setup, tons of hilarious scenes, and with funny, acute, and thoroughly quotable reflections on the human condition scattered throughout. In general, I absolutely adore his short stories and have mixed feelings about his novels, so it's fitting that my feelings about this novella fall somewhere in between the two. Downfall of the Gods tackles--you guessed it-- religion.

The story takes place in a world where the gods--who are suspiciously similar to the Greek/Roman pantheon-- routinely walk the earth, mostly to stir up trouble. Our narrating goddess is the goddess of many different qualities, including the moon, mirth, and music, but her primary role seems to be as goddess of mischief. When a murderer asks for her forgiveness, she refuses; the dead man was one of her favourite musicians. But after some prodding from her father and brother, she decides to set him a task reminiscent of Orpheus's: if he retrieves the musician from the land of the dead, he'll be rewarded with her forgiveness, and, hopefully, her inattention. As he puts it:

"Play your games if you want to. It's all right. I know you'll save me. I have faith."

"Do you now."

He nodded. "I know you want something from me. Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of Death, if you want something from me, I know I'll be just fine."

As Parker clearly intended, the smug, egocentric Goddess annoyed the hell out of me, but even so, she was a vastly entertaining narrator. She has an amusing tendency of breaking the fourth wall:

"A mortal stands on the same hilltop every night and looks at the sky. To him, it appears that the stars are moving. All wrong, of course. The stars don't move; it's the earth. (Sorry, didn't you know that? Oops. Forget I spoke.)"

as well as a breezy tendency to paraphrase the villains of literature:

"All gods are infinitely strong, but some gods are infinitely stronger than others."

I may not have actually really empathized with either the Goddess or her victim, but I did enjoy their interactions:

"To the gods all things are possible," I said, "but there's stuff we can do that we don't because it would make things worse, not better. Counterproductive, I think is the word I'm groping for."

"I see," he said. "In other words, you're very powerful but hopelessly badly organized."

At the same time, Parker's characters are almost universally united by a single failing: they are uniformly, tragically static. Even the rare characters that manage a little self-reflection rarely apply it to their actions. I want characters to grow and change throughout the story, which may be why I prefer Parker's shorter works. The Goddess is understandably static; after all, one doesn't expect much change from immortal deities. In her case, the most memorable insights come from the conversations, from the parables Archias tries to tell, and from the Goddess's bald description of practical realities:

"Is what the strongest wants necessarily Right? Well, of course it is.

To understand that, consider the meaning of the word Right. Doesn't take long to figure out that it doesn't actually mean anything. It's not like black or serrated or strawberry-flavoured; it has no objective meaning. 'Right' is just a shorthand way of saying 'what we think is right.'"

Because in the end, what purpose to the gods serve other than a well-defined moral code? As the Goddess puts it,

Without us, all they'll have is Right and Wrong. They'll get themselves in the most awful tangle.

If you're looking for a short, lighthearted religious satire, Downfall of the Gods is definitely worth a look.

~~I received a copy of this ebook through Netgalley from the publisher, Subterranean Press, in exchange for my honest review. Quotes are taken from an advanced reader copy and while they may not reflect the final phrasing, I believe they capture the spirit of the book as a whole.~~