Reply to post #18
(show post):
When I read Austen, my turn of phrase in speech and writing tends to occasionally follow her style.
I would argue that Anne is also compelled by circumstance. I really don't want to contemplate what Sir Walter and Elizabeth would do if she tried to buck their system. Her nature is the main reason but she's not in an enviable situation either.
Ah, the Peaks! I want to see them so badly. And not just from the novel. And yes, those two books, even when they travel to London, don't seem to hold a sense of place. That is both a good thing, as it could have happened anywhere, and a bad thing, no sense of being placed in a real setting.
I've actually not read
Northanger Abbey yet, but that would have been amazing! I don't know a great deal about Bronte's reasons for disliking Austen, but I've read
Jane Eyre and
Wuthering Heights and I've wondered if she couldn't understand a book being interesting without basically sensationalism. I like their books, but I love how simple and yet complex Austen's are. They are every day life and seem so very real.
Themis-Athena, I think you've expressed something I've never been able to put into words. People ask me why I'm an Anglophile. It really comes from the books I've read. I learned to love this places in connection to my favorite literary characters and by extension learned to love the history and society of the United Kingdom and her people. I've yet to manage a trip, but it's the one trip I have to make before I die. There are others (Prince Edward Island is the first to come to mind) but that is the only HAVE to.
@ The Boat Was My Friend - I found the same thing. I could visualize this book's settings so much easier and they seemed so real.