On April 23, 2014, the University of Sydney published a study verifying the absolute lack of any link between childhood combination vaccines and autism spectrum disorder [ASD]. This study was covered in both the Digital Journal, by Ben Morris, and in the Daily Mail, by Sally Lee, on May 19, 2014. While Morris’s article provided a brief history of the controversy’s origins, Lee focused on covering the study itself and its findings. I felt that Lee’s article was not only more scientific in tone, but that it required a solid understanding of autism and of the controversy, while Morris’s article was more conversational in tone and gave a better overview of autism, ASD, the history of the controversy, and the origins of the controversial link itself. Lee’s article gave very thorough and in-depth coverage of the Sydney study itself, while Morris seemed more focused on explaining exactly why this study was so significant.

So what caused this big scare? Who was at fault? What's the cause behind all of this? In this essay, Groeneveld goes straight to the facts. She compares the sources used that caused all the controversy and explains why they're so important.

Don't lose this opportunity to educate yourself on one of the biggest medical frauds of the 21st century. Check it out today!