logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: Jane-Litte
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2016-01-11 16:29
Another Day, Another Author Denounces Ellora's Cave for Non-Payment

Many of you are well aware of the disaster that's become Ellora's Cave Publishing (hereafter referred to as EC) and the well documented issue they've been having with making payroll. Well, despite the settlement between EC and Dear Author/Jane Litte, another salvo's just been launched across the bow.

 

Last Friday Jennifer Kacey posted over on Decadent Divas, asking her fans to no longer buy her books. Reason being: she hasn't been paid any royalites since Feb 2015. Nope; that's not a misprint- those are her exact words. She also poses a good question: in what country on this planet is it legal for any business to get away with not paying its employees- in this case, authors? Answer: there isn't one. She also contends that all her request for arrears and information regarding them were met with misdirection and indifferent silence at best, deliberate baiting and condescension at worst.

 

"...In any other business that's considered illegal. Guess what? It's illegal in this business too but EC for some reason has decided they're immune to actually paying their authors. Have they paid some in recent months? Yep. Have they paid me. Nope.

 

So before somebody over there gets a bug up their ass this is my information. Mine. I'm not quoting anyone else, though I could. I'm not dragging the horrible treatment others have received into this, though I could. I'm going to tell you my story. All of this is fact. FACT.

 

I'm not defaming liabling name-calling or anything else. I'm simply asking everyone, my fans, my readers and anyone else who finds this post NOT to buy my EC titles. I'll be removing them from my site as well. My books. How sad." She also has a message for anyone thinking of signing on with EC: "To the new authors at EC - RUN!!! Not walk, or even speed walk. Grab your shit and leave as fast as you can. They are not a reputable publisher. They've called us bad apples for months because we actually wanted to be paid or we wanted our rights back. Well guess what?

 

At some point you'll want to be paid, too. Do not sign with them. Do not. We are leaving in droves for a reason. Lots of reasons. Thousands of rea$on$...

 

And I'm sorry, you are not a special snowflake when it comes to them. You will get stepped on and thrown aside just as quickly as we were. Learn from us. Please. If even one person reads this post and doesn't pub with them then it will be worth it."

 

You can read the entire post over at Decadent Divas.

 

Wonder how Tina Engler aka Jaid Black will try to spin this one...?

 

 

5704102456c4b0f242ed83faaf78c7e4f008f83fd44f5f

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2015-05-11 15:51
HeartMob: the latest in Anti-Bullying already makes you Heartsick

**ETA: the orignal post erroneously stated that Courtney Milan was being sued by Tina Engler.  It has been amended to Jane Litte.**

 

"...an Internet where everyone's free to be their badass selves..." (unless you don't like something or choose to be critical)

 

On April 21, HuffPost ran an article about a group called HollaBack- that largely focuses on street harassment complaints- that's currently running a (successful) Kickstarter campaign to launch HeartMob- an online site to combat cyber-bullying.  Check the video in the link.

 

 

 

You know what they say about the Road to Hell, right? This is a catastrophe waiting to happen, no way around it. Being a natural skeptic and cynic, thanks to Anne Rice and a host of others the Internet's done nothing but reinforce and hone these senses. The problem here, as in most cases, is not so much the idea but the (lack of) execution. The Devil's always in the details, and a few key ones are glaringly absent from all the warm and fuzzy.

 

When you read throught their fanfare and propaganda- because that's what it is- you'll be quick to note a few things. First off- the lack of affiliation with any reputable or established anti-bullying/harassment organizations. Yes, it's a grassroots organization... yes, it's some concerned citizens taking action against something they feel is wrong... but few of the groups who could help them out are having anything to do with them. There's any number or reasons for this, but to me it's just not a good sign, especially for a group that been around a couple of years.

 

Second- the lack of any vetting or a system of checks & balances regarding complaints. I searched through all their info and couldn't find anything referring to a verification process. Any blogger or reviewer can speak volumes to the current climate regarding online book reviews; it's a sorry state where many authors feel justified in falsely accusing people of 'bullying' for receiving a bad review. By HeartMob's own admission, all you have to do is contact them and they've got your back- no questions asked.

 

Not a single one. Well, other than how you'd like to proceed, that is.

 

You can be lying through your teeth and they won't care. They'll be sure to protect your identity and information- because no one should be bullied for contacting them for help; they just won't bother to examine anything that you tell them. But they're ready to assist you in going after your enemies, though. So if you want a ready-made street team to attack a reviewer or flame that guy you're arguing with in a chatroom, they'll have operators standing by. HeartMob looks to be nothing more than a crying corner for anyone to come and whine about all the meanie pants of the world.

 

One of their own 'stories' shows this: a woman talks about some looneytune out on the street shouting things at her. He never approached her, never threatened her- just talked shit. I'm sorry- but how does this rate any attention whatsoever? I'm dead serious- who gives a fuck? Who hasn't had this happen to them? And this is one of their recruitment tools.

 

And I hate to keep harping on this, but just try to imagine the kind of damage that could've been done had Lauren Howard had a site like this to run to during her epic run. Or Tina Engler/Jaid Black with her current lawsuit against Jane Litte? Or any Gamergater? How about any of those people (sic) over at STGRB?

 

It shouldn't have to fall to the likes of me or anyone else to point these things out. All these thing should've been part of their business model. Especially as a non-profit, where all their practices will be available for public scrutiny, they're already off to a shaky start. Not saying that it can't get better or that it won't eventually all sort itself out, but I don't have any confidence in this already half-assed, Time Out for Adults site.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2014-12-23 23:48
Power and Privilege in Book Blogging: Dear Author Do Better!

 

Recently there was a conflict in the book reviewing blogosphere, involving contributors and the head of the book blog Dear Author, and their friend Ann Somerville targeting a author and book reviewer. If you unfamiliar with the conflict Alexis Hall gives a great rundown of the timeline and details. If you want a brief summary scroll to the bottom of the post.

 

I'm writing this post because I want to address some popular misconceptions swirling around this conflict, and explain why I felt compelled to call out Robin (known as

@redrobinreader on Twitter) specifically for her public targeting a gay man of color, on Twitter.

 

On the surface, it would appear that the conflict between Sunita (@sunita_p), a cis woman of color and Julio (@agenao), a gay cis man of color, is a parallel conflict. Robin, a cis white woman, has even argued that Julio is privileged as an author, while Sunita is a “not-for-profit” blogger and book reviewer, but this framing of the situation is misleading.

 

While a famous, best selling author can often have far more privilege and power that most book reviewers, Sunita is not just any reviewer and Julio isn't JK Rowling. The reality is that Sunita has significantly more situational privilege, created by her position at Dear Author and her powerful, privileged allies. Meanwhile Juilo’s position in publishing and the m/m romance community, not to mention as a gay man of color, is significantly lesser.  

 

Sunita is a regular contributor to Dear Author, she has a larger network of friends, both authors and book bloggers. She is well respected, and much loved by many in book blogging circles, many of these people are women (many are white and heterosexual) in places of significant influence not just in the m/m romance, but in the wide Romance community. She has many powerful, privileged allies, who specifically in this incident acted on her behalf. That’s power, a lot more power than Julio has, as we’ve seen first hand in how Sunita’s privileged friends have been attempting to shape the narrative in her favor.

 

While many will try to muddy the waters, claiming Julio is an "agent" of author KJ Charles. Alexis's post proves those to be baseless allegations. Those who continue to maintain this lie only reflect negatively upon themselves. After all, what does it say about them that they would rather ignore a gay man of color's autonomy to have his own opinion, in favor of viewing him as a puppet controlled by a white woman? (This is what I mean when I say he's being dehumanized.) 

 

So what we have here is a group of primarily white cis heterosexual women actively dehumanizing and harassing a gay man of color.

 

Ironic, considering this is happening in the m/m romance community, a genre where publishing disproportionately favors cis white women authors, despite the focus of the genre primarily being on gay men. A small amount of research will show that the majority of best selling m/m romance authors and book bloggers are cis white women, despite the fact that there are a lot of gay and trans men writing and reading in the genre.

 

It is an indisputable fact that cis white heterosexual women occupy seats of power in the m/m romance genre. While, I’ve seen many of these women take their responsibility and privilege very seriously, many championing LGBTQA+ charities and actively engage in social justice. There are those who do not recognize how powerful, and potentially dangerous they can be to LGBTQA+ people.

 

That was never more apparent than in the case of Dear Author’s post about a m/m romance author coming out as a trans man. Trigger Warning: Transphobia http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/tuesday-midday-news-aj-llewellyn-admits-adopting-male-persona-despite-being-female/

 

It’s important to understand, that while women do experience oppression and marginalization, they can still be privileged in situations with men, especially in cases where cis heterosexual white women are in positions of power among LGBTQA+ people. Even when marginalized people are in conflict with each other their friends and allies need to take their own privilege into account before getting involved.

 

A privilege person walking into a parallel conflict between marginalized people is bringing a gun to a fist fight, someone other than them will get hurt, maybe even the friend they were trying to protect.

 

Marginalize people can easily and even unintentionally weaponize our allies against other marginalized people, sometimes just by having public disagreements. This happens because our friends and allies often see us as extensions of themselves. They view attacks on us, as an attack on them, and can view their action against another marginalized person as justified because they’re doing it in our name. This can also blind them to how their own internalized bigotry might be driving their actions and quick judgements in the situation. 

 

As a marginalized person I’m actively trying to take this into account when dealing with other marginalized people. I recognize that I need educate my friends, and even warn them away if I get into parallel conflicts. I don’t need my friends to protect me, but more importantly I shouldn't leverage the privilege of our friendship against marginalize people. That's not what friendships is about.

 

I do think it’s important for privilege people to call each other out, that is how allies are supposed to help us. To back us against other privileged people, but they should also strive to NOT attack people with less privilege than themselves, even when they don’t like those people. Even when those people might be attacking their friends, people need to be cognizant of how their privileges and how the minute they walk into the conflict it becomes an unfair and even dangerous situation.

 

Side note: If you ask a privilege friend to stay out of a conflict and they attack other marginalized people in your name anyway, end the friendship immediately. That sounds harsh, but most likely that person isn’t a real friend or ally. They are probably using their relationships with you to justify targeting marginalized people, and soon enough you’ll end up on their hit list.

 

In this case, a woman of color, Sunita, made an unsubstantiated allegation against a gay man of color. He defended himself, and Sunita’s privileged friends harassed him on her behalf. While Sunita’s actions are extremely problematic, they do not justify or excuse the actions of privilege women who CHOSE to target and vilifying a gay man of color in a public forum.


AnnSomerville (
@ann_somerville), Robin, and many others are guilty of using their privileged positions, not just in m/m romance, but in the literary blogging community and social media, to unfairly target a less privileged person. Worse yet, they maintain the lie that began this entire conflict, see Jane Litte (a cis het woman of color and head of Dear Author blog) who is continuing to dehumanize and discredit Julio publicly, on Twitter. Even going so far as to not-so-subtly accuse Julio and myself of “playing the race card” to cover for his “fake review.”

 

The fact that Litte spoke out on this issue without doing even the smallest amount of research, like asking the parties involve if they are friends, is only worsening an already terrible situation, and continuing to make Julio a target of harassment. It would be so much easier to acknowledge the mistake everyone made and apologize, but so far that doesn’t seem likely.

 

So where does that leave us? Well, for me until Somerville, Sunita, Robin, and Dear Author apologize for their actions I can’t trust them as allies and I can’t view Dear Author as a safe space for anyone, but them and their friends. I’ve unfollowed them, but maintain the hope they will make things right.

 

I will be preparing an email to send to Dear Author, urging them to look into the situation further, and publicly apologize for their involvement. Once it is done I will also post it publicly on here and Tumblr. I urge you to do the same.

 

You can leave an message on their site here. http://dearauthor.com/contact-us/

 

Or contact them via social media:

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/DearAuthor

Twitter: @dearauthor

 

Until they apologize, I’m going to stick to the LGBTQA+ book bloggers and authors I know, and seek out more to add to my list of safe places where we have a voice and are shown respect. Feel free to share your recommendations for LGBTQA+ friendly book bloggers and book recommendation sites. I’m putting together a big post with everyone I follow and recommend, and would love to add your recommendations.

 

Thank you for your time and support.

 

J

 

 ETA: After some thought I wanted to come back and really emphasize something VERY important to remember. Yes she did post baseless accusations, and feel free to hold her responsible for that. However, she is NOT responsible for the choices made by Ann Somerville, Robin, and even Jane Litte, among many others, to attack Julio on social media. These are grown women, who made and continue to make the choice to target a gay man of color. 

 

DO NOT attack or hold Sunita responsible for the actions of her privileged friends and supporters. They, and they alone are responsible for their own actions. She is not. 

 

 

~~~~

A quick summary of the conflict is:

 

Ann Somerville (author and blogger) wrote a post addressing a flaw in how KJ Charles’ book Think of England dealt with racism.

 

Sunita (book reviewer and contributor to Dead Author) posted a companion piece on her personal blog wherein she accuses Julio Alexi Genao (author and book reviewer) of “gaming the system” on GoodReads in order to support KJ Charles. Sunita believed, without any supporting evidence, that Julio was a fan/friend of Charles, and asserted that his alleged actions were an example of “bankrupt critical culture.” As it turns out this was not the case at all, Julio just liked the book and his review happened to be at the top of the book’s profile page on GoodReads.

 

Someone notified Julio about Sunita’s post and accusation, via the comments on his review. He and several of his friends had a lively dialogue about the accusations, as well as the tone of both Sunita and Ann’s posts.

 

Ann and Sunita saw the conversation happening in the comments of Julio’s review, and took to Twitter to share all the unsavory things being said about them by Julio and the other commentaries. Then both women deleted their Twitter accounts, and Sunita set her blog to private.

 

Believing Sunita’s false allegation, that Julio was a friend/fan of KJ Charles, Robin L. (contributor to Dear Author) called out Charles on Twitter, linking directly to Julio’s GoodRead’s review, and demand she put a stop to Julio’s actions. Charles replied to Robin’s allegation saying she had no knowledge of what had happened, and that it was her policy to not comment on reviews.

 

At this point, I replied to Robin, because I had only see her part of the greater scope of harassment. I called her out for targeting Julio, a gay man of color, by publicly linking his review on Twitter, explaining she needed to take her privilege into account before putting a marginalized person in the line of fire. Robin maintained that since she was defending a person of color, Sunita, she was not in the wrong and then claimed that Julio had more power than Sunita who was a “not-for-profit” blogger.

 

Jane Litte (head of Dear Author), having been looped into many of these conversations, tweeted out maintained Sunita’s false narrative that Julio was a “butt hurt” fan boy, and subtweeted that "Using race and victimization as a stick to attack someone who doesn't like fake reviews is pretty despicable.”

 

Currently (12/23/14) neither Ann Somerville, nor Sunita have returned to Twitter. Sunita’s blog remains set to private. Jane Litte and Robin maintain their stance, and Julio is still a target of harassment.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2014-12-03 01:36
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum
Coming Together: Pro Bono - Alessia Brio,Alessia Brio,Barry Eisler

I don't know if you guys have been following the bruhaha involving book blog Dear Author and publisher Ellora's Cave, but I highly recommend it if you like rubbernecking, or you do any book blogging and have an interest in not getting sued. The short version: Dear Author bloggess and proprietor Jane Litte wrote a post entitled The Curious Case of Ellora's Cave. The post is a short history of Ellora's Cave, followed by a sketch of Ellora's Cave's possible financial troubles, using mostly public sources as evidence. (You can and should read it yourself, of course.) Due to this post, Ellora's Cave sues Dear Author for defamation. 

 

From here on out, I am going to avow in no uncertain terms that I am not a lawyer, have no legal background, and may inadvertently mischaracterize the legal wranglings. That aside, this simple caveman knows that defamation cases (at least in the US) are notoriously difficult to win because you have to prove malice.* Ellora's Cave will have to prove Dear Author's post not just inaccurate, but that Jane Litte was willfully and maliciously attacking the publisher. And I'm pretty sure the legal standard for malice is pretty high, such that you can't just point to posts where Litte says she thinks Ellora's Cave sucks (and to be clear, I have no idea if such a thing exists; this is purely theoretical), you have to prove that this specific post was written with the intent to fuck up Ellora's Cave's livelihood. The discovery process, should it get to that, is gonna be super interesting. 

 

Anyway, blah blah, what I really meant to say is that I think this suit is egregious bullshit, and it's clearly designed to have a chilling effect on the book blogosphere. Putting aside the legal standard, which is by needs higher than just a reasonable person's standard, Litte's post isn't defamatory or cruel in any way. I don't even have to put in some caveat about how the rhetoric was harsh and may not be to everyone's taste; it's a fairly dispassionate accounting using mostly public sources, and any back room gossip is clearly labeled as such. Author Courtney Milan -- who is herself a lawyer, and has done some really fun explanations of the legal stuff heretofore (starting here on her blog, then go forward from there) -- coined the hashtag #notchilled, and again, you can check Twitter yourself. 

 

If most hobby reviewers were sued for defamation, we'd fold like an accordion, but Dear Author is pretty visible, and Jane Litte is a lawyer. So she's fighting it, and good on her. She's hired first amendment lawyer Marc Randazza (whose personal blog is super funny, if you're into that sort of thing). Another book blog, Smart Bitches, in addition to pointing out how freaking Streisand Effect this whole action by Ellora's Cave is, has started a defense fund for Dear Author. Which she's gonna need, because your average lawsuit ranges into the tens of thousands of dollars. 

 

This book, Coming Together: Pro Bono, was put together as a fundraiser for Dear Author's defense. I'm not exactly well versed in the romance genre, so I haven't heard of most these authors, but if seems to me that if you're inclined towards the genre, this wouldn't be a bad purchase. If you don't want a romance anthology, you might consider just contributing to the defense fund. There has been a decided squeeze on book reviewers in the last couple months, from stalking, doxxing, and assault, to chilling lawsuits like this one. I'm glad that some people are willing to fight, because I know I'm too tired and fragile to do so. Nolite te bastardes carborundorum. 

 

 

 

 

 

*This is in cases where the defamed is a public figure, which Ellora's Cave is, and even they don't dispute that. For comparison, a judge just ruled that Abdulrahman Alharbi was not a public figure simply by virtue of being at the finish line, and sustaining minor injuries, in the Boston Marathon bombing. Alharbi brought suit against Glenn Beck because Beck alleged Alharbi was involved in the bombing for weeks after the man was cleared by authorities. Pretty much all articles note that if he were deemed a public figure, the case would be functionally unwinnable. 

 

"If deemed a public figure, Alharbi would have found it difficult or impossible to proceed with the suit since he would need proof of actual malice: namely, that Beck intentionally lied or recklessly disregarded the truth." -- Josh Gerstein, Politico

 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2014-10-06 22:30
Making a List ~ Checking it Twice

Of all the authors, editors and publishers who have donated to:

 

 

If you're looking for a book and you want to support these people, check out the list. You might just find what you're looking for.

 

http://www.amazon.com/forum/romance/ref=cm_cd_fp_ef_tft_tp?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=FxM42D5QN2YZ1D&cdThread=Tx39RJK81HY47ZA

 

 

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?