I downloaded a free copy of Hostile Witness: A Josie Bates Thriller, from Amazon. In exchange, I offer this, my fair and honest review.
My first and foremost interest of study, I think it would be fair to say, has always been criminal law. It was the reason I went to law school—though due to a number of reasons, I have never actually practiced in the area. Even so, as I remain fascinated by the criminal mind and by the pursuit for justice, it was no mistake that I grabbed up a copy of Hostile Witness. I am glad I did. This was an engaging read, with fully drawn characters, and a mystery to solve.
Josie Baylor-Bates is a defense attorney seeking to hide from her past—a past in which her efforts helped to free someone who it later became known, was responsible for a horrendous crime. Josie knows she did her job, but she is guilt-ridden. Enter Linda Sheraton, mother to Hannah, a troubled teenager accused of murdering Linda’s father-in-law. Hannah is a truly tragic character and her mother a truly despicable woman. When mother and daughter’s interests cannot both be met, Josie makes the only choice open to her: she chooses to help Hannah.
I quite enjoyed this read. I did, however, find one thing that did not quite settle right. That is, that Josie asks a question at trial—a question to which she did not have the answer and therefore, her asking it was in error. I understand how that could happen. What I found odd was that Josie did not go on to ask the obvious follow-up question. The witness’s own testimony put that witness at the crime scene and that witness was interested in placing the blame on Hannah. Pointing the finger in the witness’s direction may have created the reasonable doubt the jury would have needed. Notwithstanding this one issue, I enjoyed this journey immensely and recommend it to others!
Also posted on Amazon, www.Oathtaker.com and GoodReads, added to my Facebook page and two Google+ review groups, tweeted and cover pinned.
Eyewitness by Rebecca Forster
To be honest I struggled to get into this book. There were a few times I almost gave up. It was the frustration of not knowing what was going on that got me, it was like I was reading two different books. I'm pleased I persisted as once I found out what was going on it all sort of made sense in a way and when I eventually got hooked I had to read to the end to find out how everything turned out. However, I don't think the technique of writing two different stories in alternate chapters quite worked. The stories were so different, not even taking place in the same country or the same era, and until they eventually merged and overlapped, it was just too confusing. The neatly wrapped up ending was also a little unsatisfying, as if it was written just to set up a sequel. All in all it was an okay read, but nothing to do a happy dance about.
I'm busy reading Eyewitness by Rebecca Forster. It took me a while to get hooked as for many pages I had no clue what was going on. It kept jumping between a flashback chapter which seemed to be a different story that had nothing to do with the current story - different characters, different country even. I felt like I was reading two different books at the same time. But last night the two stories merged and now I am hooked! Hopefully will finish it today!