logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: The-Battle-of-the-Labyrinth
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2017-06-23 03:59
Percy Jackson and the Battle of the Labyrinth
Percy Jackson & the Battle of the Labyrinth - Rick Riordan

In lieu of a proper review (which I just haven’t felt like doing lately), I present to you a Percy Jackson Checklist:

 

☑ Monsters show up at school; shenanigans ensue.

☑ A quest is given; Percy’s participation is crucial.

☑ Other characters have to school Percy on Greek mythology because apparently he can’t be arsed learning all this stuff his life might depend on him knowing.

☑ Token mentions of ADHD.

☑ Annabeth is conflicted and angsty.

☑ Luke is conflicted and sad/angry (sangry?).

☑ Kronos is six steps ahead of everyone.

 

I could probably keep going and expand this into a Percy Jackson Bingo Card. But, much like Percy learning Greek mythology, I can’t be arsed.

 

I wasn’t thrilled with the advent of the love triangle (square . . . ish?) in this book, even though it meant Percy finally got a love interest not related to him. I will not be fooled into thinking that Percy will end up with anyone other than Annabeth, his first cousin once removed. Bleh. I’m still enjoying the series overall, but this kissing cousins thing does dampen my enthusiasm a bit. I should’ve kept reading this series as it came out. You know, before I realized pretty much everyone at Camp Half-Blood is related to each other.

Like Reblog Comment
review 2016-10-18 02:32
The Battle of the Labyrinth - Rick Riordan

Annabeth was pretty annoying in this one, in my opinion. I like Rachel and that she was given a bigger role and I liked Calypso's part as well. That was interesting. There was also a jab at the use of standardized tests that i enjoyed. Part of me felt that it was a bit out of place and took me out of the story a little bit, but i did think it was funny.

 

Other than that, nothing really stuck out to me.

You know what i'm going to say. It was enjoyable enough; i probably won't read it again.

 

*Reviewed on August 9, 2014.*

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2016-07-25 08:31
Review: Percy Jackson and the Battle of the Labyrinth (Percy Jackson and the Olympians #4) by Rick Riordan
The Battle of the Labyrinth - Rick Riordan

Goodreads summary:

This summary has some spoilers in it from the previous books, so that's why I'm not showing it to you guys.

 

My opinion:

While reading it I had a feeling between liking it and really liking it, but I wasn't obsessed. It took me more than ten days to read a book that only has 360 pages, so that says something. This is why I give this novel 3,5 stars. I still really appreciate this series and recommend it. I cant't say much more because it'll spoil the previous books too. If you like Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, I'm sure you'll like this book in this series too. Unfortunately that was/is my least favorite book (I still like all Harry Potter books, of course, but I've never been a fan of tournaments and sports events), because there were quite a few elements that were similar.  

 

What is your opinion about this book?

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2016-03-15 02:28
Another book another quest
Percy Jackson and the Battle of the Labyrinth - Rick Riordan

Yes. The fourth book for the Percy Jackson adventure. 

 

There is a threat. The bad guys are after Percy. He went back to the half blood camp and the new quest is formulated and begin the next adventure. 

 

It is a bit formulated. But then this is for young children who lives are separated into intervals between schools and summer holidays. 

 

So it is more suitable for them. As adults do like simple thing that is predictable yet with a bit of good storytelling. So this is just good for a fast read. 

 

This is the 4th and I got the 5th and final one already in the series. 

 

Start with a 4 stars first as I'm only 40% into the book. 

 

70% finished.

 

And the part that Percy discovered his power is kind of cool.

 

The part he got some romantic idea is not so good. Percy sound so clueless when it comes to having feeling for a person that is beyond friendship. This is just not convincing. 

 

Or is it too long ago that I forgot how teenagers act.

 

One, Annabelle kiss him. 

Two. Another girl kiss him on the forehead.

 

And Percy has "no reaction". Not like "oh my gosh it feel weird to be kissed"? 

Percy reaction is, stand there and not able to move. But more important thing comes along and he has to do that other thing.

 

No. 

 

Seriously. I would except that he talks about it or at least try to find the chance to talk about this with the kiss planner first. 

 

 

 

Like Reblog Comment
review 2015-11-28 06:08
Not even a review so much as an...explanation
The Battle of the Labyrinth - Rick Riordan

In Which I Try To Pretend This Book/Series Is Deeper Than It Probably Really Is

I don't know why, but I've come to realize that I actually find my love of this series slightly embarrassing.

Having read it as a child though, it had an impact on my growth in a way I consistently underestimate.

For a long time I've found the attitudes of the literary community towards children extremely confusing. A lot of reviewers, when they read books they find to be immature or simplistic, will call it "very young." If a YA book has any strikingly complex language, many will say "I can't imagine young children actually understanding this." If there's violence or any themes of sexuality, it's going to be "recommended for older readers, not sure about young children, seems a little too dark." I actually started encountering these pervasive attitudes far before I was consciously aware of a literary community, around the same age when I read Percy Jackson; from librarians, teachers, and parents.

It often made me question the validity of my experiences as a child, and I don't mean only in a personal way; I wondered about my schoolmates and friends as well. All the friendships we made, the opinions we formed, the books we read: was it all just a "stage," a period of immaturity to be sneered at in hindsight once we passed the glorious age of 18 years old? One thing children are often told is "you'll understand when you're older." To put it in another, although not perfectly comparable context, it's kind of the same feeling you get when you're trying to learn a foreign language; the fluent speakers will watch your pathetic stumbles and chuckle amusingly, but they won't take seriously the silly idiot's attempts to actually communicate.

Reading this series, but this book especially, I'm forced to ask the same questions, but in a completely different light. Most of these characters are teenagers, which made them perfectly relatable for me, although they were actually a little older than I was. Their ages are pretty central to the story though--not just as a marketable aspect to a target audience--in the uneasy transition between childhood and adulthood, trying to find their destiny as they grow up without too many repercussions. Riordan makes it a little more immediate by making not just the protagonist, but almost all the main characters suffer through the effects of having an absent parent (result of being a demigod). The conflict of the entire series is driven by Luke Castellan's bitterness towards his absent father, Hermes, and his perception that Hermes abandoned him.

I honestly don't know why Percy Jackson is as popular as it is, but the reason why it's so fascinating to me are the questions that seems to be spinning at the story's heart: what happens to you when one of your parents aren't around? How do you forge your identity out of the instability that surrounds you? Do you come to terms with it? Are you strong enough to hang onto yourself long enough to find a new family? Do you even survive?

It's a range of possibility that is explored many ways, through multiple characters and several layered backstories, surprising as that might be in these fast-paced stories. Thalia, Nico, Percy, Annabeth, Luke, Zoe Nightshade, and on and on and on all deal with these problems, and this common struggle is what, to me, starts to blur the line between heroes and villains in this series, because they're all reacting to similar circumstances, but differently based on their personalities and the friends they might be lucky enough to find (or unlucky enough not to find).

In this book, another character is introduced: Ethan Nakamura, who, as we find out later, exchanged his eye in return for a promise from his mother Nemesis (goddess of revenge) that the world would be fair and he'd finally gain respect. Even as a child, even when Ethan only appears for maybe ten pages of this entire book, this character attracted my attention. He's sixteen years old, and he feels enough resentment at the world to sacrifice his own eye, in addition to joining an army of monsters that forces him to fight to the death for entertainment, and eventually, pledge his allegiance to raise Kronos/Cronus himself.

 

"Who are you?" I asked.

"Ethan Nakamura," he said. "I have to kill you."

"Why are you doing this?"

"Hey!" a monster jeered from the stands. "Stop talking and fight already!"

"I have to prove myself," Ethan told me. "Only way to join up."


What strikes me about his interactions with Percy is that Percy's supposed moral high ground isn't enough to turn Ethan from the "dark side"--or the "wrong side," as Annabeth calls it. Already, that's quite a detour from the route of most fantasy stories, where the hero is always in the right, and can "convert" enemies through a single act of mercy or kindness, as indeed Percy does show to Ethan when he decides to spare him. It's an implicit message that a single person's righteousness isn'tenough to reverse years of built-up bitterness, much less correct the source of the problem at hand. In The Last Olympian, that only happens when the "villains" realize that their goals for justice and peace were the same all along, and they make a decision on their own terms to change sides in the name of what they think is right.

It's a strangely powerful message that everyone has a unique side of the story, that we shouldn't underestimate other people's capacity to understand what's going on. That people have reasons for the way they act, legitimate reasons that take effort to understand. For the type of reader that tends to sympathize with villains as much as the protagonists (like me), it's an invaluable show of empathy on the author's part that I can rarely find, but dearly treasure when I do. As a child, I coveted the reassurance that I could actually be right (even when adults thought I was wrong), that I actually possessed the ability to evaluate my situation for myself. Ethan's character, among many, went a long way into solidifying that reassurance. As I've grown older, I find the message to be no less valuable. It's ultimately up to ourselves to decide what we want in life, that our problems have to be solved on our own terms, even if that problem's source comes from a lack of guidance in the first place. It may be uncomfortable that we have to deal with those struggles at a young age, but it's even worse if you leave it to fester and let it provide an ideological scapegoat for all your problems, as Luke so tragically does.

So, how oblivious are children and teenagers to the darkness/imperfections of the world, really? In Percy Jackson's world of gods, heroes, monsters, and Titans, the answer to that would be "oblivious enough to run away from home, build armies, raise a dead evil overlord, and fight a deadly war that ends up tearing apart friendships and kills hundreds of people."(Actually not sure about the numbers, but the offstage death count is implied to be pretty high.)

Just to be clear however, this series doesn't only validate the experiences of the younger generation. The parent and mentor characters are just as flawed, dynamic, and independent as the kids; you've got Hermes's conflicted resignation towards his son's impending fate, Athena's pride in Annabeth, Artemis's relationship with her hunters, Sally Jackson's steady love for Percy, all of whom I find much more appealing and humanizing than Harry Potter's rather cliche Dumbledore, Snape, Harry's dead parents etc.

Although this book resolves with quite a brilliant climactic battle in seven pages of nonstop action, one of the scenes I find myself returning to again and again is the end where Poseidon shows up for Percy's birthday. It's a rare experience for Percy to see his dad, but he treasures it just the same. Instead of inciting resentment on Percy's part, the only thing he really feels is gratitude--because he's been lucky enough to find support in other places. He smiled, and at that moment, just being in the kitchen with him was the best birthday present I ever got.Funny how the positive side of human conflict is mostly represented by Percy, even if the central theme of the story is quite dark. What makes it work is the feeling the reader gets that this is mostly a matter of luck and circumstance, rather than having us take it for granted.

It also provides us with an endearingly sarcastic narrator to tell the story as well, which lightens everything up considerably.

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?