logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: edwards
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2017-10-17 05:43
Slow pace
Bad Reputation: A Bad Boys of Sports Novel - Nicole Edwards

Bad Reputation grabs the reader's attention pretty quickly as characters are introduced and we learn about the friendship between Chase and Cassie. The characters are interesting and the dialogue is often witty and fun. While Chase is a bad boy on the ice, I wouldn't necessarily call him that when it comes to romance. A playboy, yes, but that doesn't make him a bad boy. His best friend who, according to the blurb, calls him on his BS, even mentions what a great guy he is and how well he treats women. That aside, the story is engaging at the beginning, but begins to fizzle soon thereafter. The pacing is almost agonizingly slow at times and I found myself wondering if there was actually going to be any romance. Things do start to heat up between Cassie and Chase, but the turnaround in Cassie's behavior seemed a bit much, considering how career driven she is up to that point. 

The writer is certainly talented and the premise is good, but the pacing made it too easy to set aside for something else. 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2017-10-16 23:20
Reading progress update: I've read 206 out of 278 pages.
Resorting to Murder: Holiday Mysteries: A British Library Crime Classic (British Library Crime Classics) - Martin Edwards

so I met Reggie Fortune--H. C. Bailey's crime-solving creation--and it was grand. well, close to grand. any time I work my way through a short story collection, I yet again learn how much I prefer novels. but nothing specifically against 'The Hazel Ice' by Bailey which was quite clever, and ever since I Martin Edwards alerted me to the fact that there are a fair amount of old stories and novels in the Crime & Mystery genre that exploit a mountain-climbing motif--and with Sinister Crag needing a reprint cuz I don't wanna spend that kind of crazy cash until we get that new edition--I've been hoping for Crime at high altitude, and the Bailey yarn was a welcome bit of mayhem in the Swiss and Austrian Alps. hit the spot. sorry for the guy who hit near the bottom of a mountain, but, for me, hit the spot. one of the longer stories in this collection, too; I think many of my very favorite short stories come in around 40 pages ('The Autopsy', by Michael Shea, anyone?--sorry, just stopping to peddle my favorite Horror story of the short variety, before Halloween...).

 

of course, now I see that there are six out of fourteen tales left in this book for me to read...with not many pages left to get them done. well, I guess I'll have to hope for some dynamite 10-pagers. but I am hard to please, when it's that quick. the next one, by Anthony Berkeley, has apparently been very hard to find, as--I think--are several of the ones left for the back pages. that's cool! I like that.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2017-10-15 23:22
Reading progress update: I've read 169 out of 278 pages.
Resorting to Murder: Holiday Mysteries: A British Library Crime Classic (British Library Crime Classics) - Martin Edwards

today, I read two stories contained in this book: 'The Vanishing of Mrs Fraser' by Basil Thomson, and 'A Mystery of the Sand-Hills' by R. Austin Freeman. the latter tale was better, in my opinion; I found the Thomson story a bit contrived and far-fetched. I think the conspirators in that story enacted a scheme that anyone could look at and say "this is full of holes, this is not going to work". the second story starred Freeman's sleuth, Dr. Thorndyke, who was, in his heyday, comparable to Sherlock Holmes, in his ability to examine something and find ten things, unnoticeable to everyone else, to help him solve a case. that's on display here, to good effect, as is the fairly lackluster writing style that kept the author from rivaling Arthur Conan Doyle, in terms of lasting popularity. nevertheless--though straightforward enough to be called wooden, the style is certainly very clear, and I can't imagine R. Austin Freeman--when speaking through his creation Thorndyke--ever laying out the clues and solution to a complex case in a confusing manner. having been warned about the dull style, I dealt with it and focused on the fairly entertaining Murder Mystery exhibited, and had a lot of fun during my introduction to this author.

 

I'm excited about the next author I'm to encounter in this book...H. C. Bailey. his short stories are supposed to greatly outshine his novels, and his style is supposed to be unique and memorable, as applied to Mystery stories a bit ahead of their time in terms of deeper-than-typical probings (for the time) of human psychology and human cruelty. so I have high expectations for what's to come in my next "Holiday Mystery".

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2017-10-15 08:05
Reading progress update: I've read 239 out of 239 pages.
The Bishop's Pawn (A Marc Edwards Mystery Book 7) - Don Gutteridge

Finished! It was okay, but the politics was a slog and the book really, really wasn't intended for newbies to the series. I'm pretty sure there were references to at least two or three previous books: one involving Marc Edwards' wife's first husband's murder, one that introduced this book's murder victim, and one featuring Marc's reunion with his mother.

 

Oh, and Cobb was a moron. Everyone kept talking about how he needed to learn tact, but his real problem was his habit of telling potential suspects everything.

 

Anyway, I can now mark the Murder Most Foul square.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2017-10-14 01:23
The Golden Age of Murder
The Golden Age of Murder - Martin Edwards

What started out strong for the first couple of parts, started struggling towards the middle and by the end it strongly resembled the book that was soon to follow it: The Story of Classic Crime in 100 Books; with paragraphs and chapters stuffed with titles and authors.

 

Still, it's all relative, because The Golden Age of Murder remains very readable and very interesting from start to finish.  It just wasn't as strong at the end as it was at the beginning and as a result, my 4 star rating of what I thought was going to be a 5 star read.

 

A few minor things did bother me though, in no particular order:

 

- Edwards assumes the reader knows their dates.  This reader is crap with dates, but excellent at reading comprehension, so usually an author gives a date and I can infer the dates of later events.  BUT Edwards bounces back and forth on the timeline, so he'll give a date, but then refer back to earlier events for a few paragraphs, then bounce ahead to future events, never stating any additional dates.  This became painfully irritating when he started discussing King Edward's abdication, as he bounced between events that happened before his coronation, after his abdication, during his reign, etc.  

 

I should not need supplementary reading in order to make Edwards' narrative flow correctly.

 

- Edwards' bias for some authors over others is pretty obvious.  Which is ok - although I question how ok when someone is aiming to write an authoritative historical text.  His contempt for Christianna Brand is glaring and he's outright snarky about the Coles' political beliefs, coming just short of calling them hypocrites.  He seems to start out liking Anthony Berkeley, but by the end it's all pity, and perhaps a polite disgust (to be fair, I'm not sure there's much else to feel about Berkeley by the end, it sounds like his was a life wasted for want of a good psychiatrist).  

 

He treated Christie the most objectively, and towards the end goes so far as to offer up some very rational theories for her 11 day disappearance, but at all times it's clear he has a lot of respect and admiration for her.  But Edwards saves the most blatant bias for Dorothy L. Sayers; I'd go so far as to speculate that he crushes on Sayers.  He's downright romantic about her throughout the book, constantly reminding the reader about her deep, dark secret and the heavy burden of guilt and responsibility she always carried with her, not to mention that drunken lout of a husband she had strung 'round her neck her whole life.  And that leads me to my last gripe:

 

 - Towards the end, Edwards does that thing that drives me insane: he speculates ahead of the facts and presents it as truth.  It's not often (maybe he just rushed the end?), but several times he presents his interpretation of a book's themes, or an author's motivation, as truth without providing evidence.  

 

The most egregious example was in the last chapter when he (again) tells the reader how big a burden Sayers carried with her throughout her life. I'm going to put the rest of it in a spoiler tag; skip the spoiler if you know nothing at all about Sayers and would like to find out for yourself, or if you just don't care that much about the whole thing, because I do go on and on.

 

 

He addresses the question: Why, after Mac finally adopted John Anthony, did she not bring John Anthony home to live with them?  He tells the reader it is her guilt and fear of public shame over her youthful indiscretion that prohibited her from doing so.  

 

Nobody knows why she didn't bring him home, because she never once wrote about John Anthony or discussed John Anthony with anybody.  Ever.  Not even John Anthony.

 

But if I were in Sayers shoes, shame/guilt/embarrassment might have had a place in my reasoning, but they would be dwarfed by the fact that I was married to a great big alcoholic who suffered from great big mood swings and PTSD, and I was never home.  Edwards' romantic notions of self-flagellation via guilt and shame is nonsense.  A much more rational theory is that Sayers didn't want to pull John Anthony out of a happy home environment he was born into so she could stuff him in a house as dysfunctional and unhappy as the one she was living in, just so she could come out of the closet as a mom.

 

I don't doubt for a second that Martin Edwards knows his stuff - far, far better than I know it, but he's trying to make Sayers into a tragic, romantic heroine that frankly from what he's told me about her personality in this book, would sicken her if she heard it.  It's not logical to think that someone who was as pragmatic as Sayers was would suddenly go all romantic about her son.  By the time Mac stepped up, there was no chance of righting history, so why try?  Pragmatically, she did everything she legally could to legitimise John Anthony, and the best decision for John Anthony by that point was to let him keep the happy home he already had.  But that's just my opinion; for all anyone knows she might just have liked not having to be a mom in more than name.  We'll never know and it irritates me that Edwards claims he does.   ::end of rant::

(spoiler show)

 

 

Overall, an excellent book for anyone interested in the Golden Age of crime fiction, even if it does lose a bit of steam towards the end.  I'd unhesitatingly recommend it to mystery lovers who want to know more.  Or to those I think have TBRs that need beefing up!  ;-)

 

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?