logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: guidelines
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
text 2016-10-20 08:13
Friends and family not an asset for this writer

When it comes to my writing and friends and family I've established clear boundaries. Here they are:

 

- I don’t talk about my writing even if asked. Those inquiring are usually only doing it to be polite and aren't really interested. In any case, listening to someone talk about their writing is profoundly boring – even for me and I’m a writer.

- I don’t solicit reviews or ratings from them. I try to avoid even the faintest hint of conflict of interest in the support and criticisms I get.

- I very rarely give them my books. If they’re interested they can buy one.

 

I once went to a birthday party where a friend’s partner had rented a gallery and had a show professionally mounted of her paintings. Needless to say, most of those attending bought some of her art. She was thrilled.

 

This to me was not a measure of artistic merit. I didn’t buy anything, in fact, I was surprised and not a little offended. This was hardly better than a Tupperware party.  

 

I don’t want to be that person.  I don’t want to take advantage of my friends and family. I don’t want to demean myself and my work.

 

The independent publishing industry is rife with nepotism, gimmicks, and chicanery – all geared toward reaching bestseller status. I don’t care if I’m a bestseller, but I do want to become a better writer. I think these practices prevent that from happening by creating a false sense of accomplishment.

 

You think you’re good, but your not. You’re delusional.  

 

I don’t know if this stand has hurt my sales or not. If it has it hasn’t been significant because I’m just not that popular – with friends or family.

 

I've also developed guidelines for social media.

 

I don't solicit followers on Twitter, don't "friend" people on Facebook, and don't appeal to viewers to "like" or "subscribe" to my YouTube channel.

 

I do encourage comments and criticisms which I faithfully respond to and hopefully learn something from.

 

Amazingly, some people chose to follow me which is gratifying because it definitely is not reciprocated.

 

I had one expert tell me "social media is not for you". Really? Maybe just not her kind of social media, the kind where friends and followers are little more than meaningless numbers and bare no resemblance of reality.

 

I still believe a social media following can be built by someone who has something interesting and original to say regardless of whether he's a friend, follower or subscriber.

 

Later this month I'll be waiting with Linus in the pumpkin patch.

 

 

Stay calm, be brave, watch for the signs

 

30

 

 

 

Find reviews, blurbs and buy links to my seven novels and two plays at

http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B003DS6LEU

 

Facebook for writing news, my experience as a writer as well as promotions, contests, giveaways and discounts regarding my books

https://www.facebook.com/Rod-Raglin-337865049886964/

 

Video book reviews of self-published authors now at

Not Your Family, Not Your Friend Video Book Reviews: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCH45n8K4BVmT248LBTpfARQ

 

Cover Art of books by self-published authors at

https://www.pinterest.com/rod_raglin/rod-raglins-reviews-cover-art/

 

More of my original photographs can be viewed, purchased, and shipped to you as GREETING CARDS; matted, laminated, mounted, framed, or canvas PRINTS; and POSTERS. Go to: http://www.redbubble.com/people/rodraglin

 

View my flickr photostream at https://www.flickr.com/photos/78791029@N04/

 

Or, My YouTube channel if you prefer photo videos accompanied by classical music

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsQVBxJZ7eXkvZmxCm2wRYA

 

 

 

 

 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2016-10-03 23:29
And Today, This Happened on Amazon...

Longtime Amazon customers are probably aware of the recent plague of coupon club reviews that have been infesting the site over the past year or so. Basically, the word is out that certain reviewers/bloggers, etc, are enjoying the privileges of getting all kinds of free & cheap crap (in every sense) from various companies and they want in. no matter what. No one seemed all that interested in free books, though...

 

Naturally, shady stuff commenced. Companies like Amazon Review Trader (AMZRT) popped up, offering all kinds of bullshit on the cheap, so long as you provided them with an "honest & unbiased review". Which would lead to more cheapies, and so on.

 

Well, not anymore. Or at least, not so much until they figure out a way around things. https://www.amazon.com/p/feature/abpto3jt7fhb5oc

 

Update on Customer Reviews

October 3, 2016

 

Customer reviews are one of the most valuable tools we offer customers for making informed purchase decisions, and we work hard to make sure they are doing their job. In just the past year, we’ve improved review ratings by introducing a machine learned algorithm that gives more weight to newer, more helpful reviews; applying stricter criteria to qualify for the Amazon verified purchase badge; and suspending, banning or suing thousands of individuals for attempting to manipulate reviews. Our community guidelines have always prohibited compensation for reviews, with an exception – reviewers could post a review in exchange for a free or discounted product as long as they disclosed that fact. These so-called ‘incentivized reviews’ make up only a tiny fraction of the tens of millions of reviews on Amazon, and when done carefully, they can be helpful to customers by providing a foundation of reviews for new or less well-known products.

 

Today, we updated the community guidelines to prohibit incentivized reviews unless they are facilitated through the Amazon Vine program. We launched Vine several years ago to carefully facilitate these kinds of reviews and have been happy with feedback from customers and vendors.

 

Here’s how Vine works: Amazon – not the vendor or seller – identifies and invites trusted and helpful reviewers on Amazon to post opinions about new and pre-release products; we do not incentivize positive star ratings, attempt to influence the content of reviews, or even require a review to be written; and we limit the total number of Vine reviews that we display for each product. Vine has important controls in place and has proven to be especially valuable for getting early reviews on new products that have not yet been able to generate enough sales to have significant numbers of organic reviews. We also have ideas for how to continue to make Vine an even more useful program going forward. Details on that as we have them. The above changes will apply to product categories other than books. We will continue to allow the age-old practice of providing advance review copies of books. Thank you. – Chee Chew, VP, Customer Experience

 

Sounded great to me! Until I read this:

 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_left_v4_sib?ie=UTF8&nodeId=202094170

 

Promotional Content in Customer Reviews

Our goal is to capture all the energy, enthusiasm, and feedback (both favorable and critical) that customers have about a product while avoiding use of reviews to advertise, promote, or mislead.

 

To help illustrate, here are a few examples of reviews that we don't allow: • *A product brand posts a review of their own product

• *A customer posts a review in exchange for cash, a free or discounted product, a gift certificate, or a discount off a future purchase provided by a third party

• *A customer posts a review in exchange for entry into a contest or sweepstakes or membership in a program

• *A customer posts a review of a game in exchange for bonus in-game content or credits • *A relative, close friend, business associate, or employee of the product creator posts a review to help boost sales

• *A customer posts a review of the product after being promised a refund in exchange for the review

• *A seller posts negative reviews about a competitor's product

• *An author posts a positive review about a peer's book in exchange for receiving a positive review from the peer

 

(It's that second entry that's giving me pause.)

 

And furthermore: https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201929730

 

Promotions and Commercial Solicitations

In order to preserve the integrity of Community content, content and activities consisting of advertising, promotion, or solicitation (whether direct or indirect) is not allowed, including:

• Creating, modifying, or posting content regarding your (or your relative's, close friend's, business associate's, or employer's) products or services.

• Creating, modifying, or posting content regarding your competitors' products or services.

• Creating, modifying, or posting content in exchange for compensation of any kind (including free or discounted products) or on behalf of anyone else.

• Offering compensation or requesting compensation (including free or discounted products) in exchange for creating, modifying, or posting content.

• Posting advertisements or solicitations, including URLs with referrer tags or affiliate codes.

 

(That third line is what's bugging me.)

 

And last, but not least: "Book authors and publishers may continue to provide free or discounted copies of their books to readers, as long as the author or publisher does not require a review in exchange or attempt to influence the review."

 

...uhhh...

 

I often review books from book tour companies and whatnot, so while it says ARCs directly provided by publishers are ok it's also saying no third-party providers allowed. 

 

I'll admit I'm a little confused here. I'm not mad about the changes; I'm glad this finally happened and think they should've gone even further with cleaning things up. I just wish they'd be clearer about what's what to help avoid mistakes.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2016-08-13 18:00
Backup (Export) your booklikes shelves and reviews?

 

 

Has it really been three years of promises?  Are the Community Guidelines and Official Supplements to guidelines posts really still talking about new features and updates from booklikes staff every Thursday?

 

THREE YEARS????? !!!!!

 

(They promised in more comments, discussions and posts than the one I conveniently screenshot because was on the official guidelines section but that one was handy.  )

 

I'm sure I've nagged them about this 2013 thru 2015 by email, on their posts, their comments and their discussions -- and I've seen others also doing so.  Kinda gave up in 2016 getting any staff activity and just decided to backup on Leafmarks for the booklikes shutdown the lack of staff activity and sales rumors had me anticipating [I see the irony now that Leafmarks shut down after prolonged staff inactivity].

 

Earlier this summer in the bug group, there actually was staff contact.  Where they said had email issues, programmer to hire and were not sold to new owners.

 

The minute we hear they've got a programmer again, maybe we should make sure to once again beg for data export/backup.

Source: blog.booklikes.com/post/198757/booklikes-community-guidelines
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2015-07-09 14:44
T. Neilson – Submission Guidelines
Submission Guidelines - T. Neilson

Reviewer: Vivian

Genre: M/M BDSM

 

Review:
An enemies to lovers theme--sort of.

 

Cole is adorable and slightly uncoordinated and really reminded me of a puppy. Full of cuteness and looking to be loved.

 

Daniel's the BAMF bounty hunter chasing down his prey. Except his prey wanders straight to him, and that's when he begins to doubt that his intel is good... or is his target that good?

 

So the mystery of Cole has got Daniel questioning what's going on, and his attraction to his target is clouding his judgment. Fun, lighthearted and flirty romance with a dash of guns and excitement.

 

Two things did not thrill me about the story. First, I don't like MCs who are writers. Writers writing about writers as main characters generally make me cringe. Not so bad here, but I it rips me out of story every time. That is totally a me thing, a pet peeve and most likely annoys few other readers. Second, the timing for the D/s was inappropriate. I liked professionals to be professional, and when they're not, you can't expect me to believe that they're competent at other times. So, the scene in the middle of a high alert situation--eye roll--though the sweetness with a tinge of rough was pretty hot.  Essentially, I lost the believability factor when Daniel acted so unprofessional. Ditto for his backup.

 

My rating is a 2.5- 3 stars, and I'm going to round up because the story had good pace, likable characters, and it wasn't trying to be hard core suspense.

Favorite quote:

“Well, honestly, I don’t think I’ve gotten off so fast since I was in high school. Gave myself a goddamned bell ringer in the shower right after.”

 

Source: heartsonfirereviews.com/review-t-neilson-submission-guidelines
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2015-02-20 21:38
How To Open A New Book

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?