Sometimes it is really hard to drag up out of one's deep memory the names of all the books that I have read. Granted, I could list all of the Little Golden Books that I read as a child, but somehow I think that defeats the purpose of listing all the books that one has read on Booklikes (though I just entered Little Red Caboose into Goodreads to find that it has a rating of 4/5 with something like 439 listings), though since finding them sitting on my brother's bookshelf I have ended up doing just that (along with the Dr Suess Books and the Mr Men books). Anyway, this digression has little to nothing to do with Starship Troopers, with the exception of my long term memory kicking me in the backside and reminding me that I read this book a while ago.
I had seen the movie Starship Troopers prior to reading this book, and Starship Troopers is still one of my favourite, no-thinking, sci-fi action movies, but the book does have a little to do with the film (beyond the title that is). The book is about militarism when one's country is under attack. Earth is being bombarded with meteorites from another system that are being directed by a race of insects. This is not a story about two space powers slugging it out in space with star destroyers, but rather a race of insects who are able to launch their progeny through space and invade planets that way.
The enemy is clearly an unthinking race of creatures (they are not sentient, but still incredibly dangerous) that simply seeks to go out and destroy everything in their path. They are insects in the purest form possible. I have read a lot of books where the insects are sentient, but alien, creatures, however that is not the case here. These insects are what you would expect from insects, though most biologists would scoff at the fact that these giant insects are chitinous, particularly since insects this size would not be able to lift the shell. However this is science-fiction, and in a lot of cases, the laws of science get thrown out the window when dealing with this genre (and who knows, we might actually find a race of giant, chitinous, insects on a low gravity world).
This is more a book about life in the military than having some detailed plot. Heinlein seems to work his books like this, though fortunately the ending of this book did not come out as being tacked on in the same way that the ending of Podkayne of Mars did, though like the previous book, Starship Troopers is more like a journal of life in the military.
Heinlein's military is harsh though. Some have suggested that it is nothing like the film, and I must admit that I agree having read this book (albeit a while ago). The one thing I noticed is that there are no support roles (such as cooks), the soldiers are responsible for everything. These days it is suggested that for every soldier out fighting you need at least two auxiliary personal to support them. Granted, the cook does not cook for just one person, but for a number, however when cooking for 50 men, the head cook will need a lot of other cooks to help him (or her as the case may be). However, in this army everybody fights, and everybody also does the chores that are required of them. This, to an extent, makes for a much more efficient (and cheaper) army.
The problem that I do have with this book is the fact that the movie keeps on getting in the way. The movie is not necessarily what one would expect of the movie though in that it does not follow a traditional plot. It is not until close to the end that we discover the purpose of the film, and the main character is not moving towards a specifically defined goal. However it does not mean that it is a bad book, because the book is more about how the character becomes a soldier, and you could say it is the same in the film.
There’s a movie supposedly based on this book. The movie has the same title, but that’s where the similarities end.
The movie is an action adventure story about a bunch of very photogenic co-ed soldiers who land on a rocky world filled with giant bugs. They proceed to get regularly surrounded while trying to battle these creatures with archaic weapons and idiotic tactics that would have made General George Custer proud. The movie is asinine, but I still liked it because it had action, sex, and romance, and sometimes that’s all that’s necessary. Actually, most times. But I’m here to talk about the book.
The book is largely about philosophy and politics. It’s a narrative given by a rich kid named Johnny Rico who volunteers for the Mobile Infantry. The story focuses on the meaning this has for him, and the significance of soldiering in society, and the way this significance filters down to society’s smallest elements while acting as one of its key foundations.
There’s not much action and only a few real characters. Author Robert Heinlein has a lot to say, and he often uses Johnny’s training instructors as his mouthpiece. I don’t mean in a symbolic sense, but in a “soapbox” sense. They lecture Johnny (and the reader) quite a bit.
I’m not even sure why I liked this book, but I did. Maybe it was all the depth and thoughtfulness. I felt like I was immersed in a quality piece of writing.
Starship Troopers by Robert A. Heinlein
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
This is my very first Robert A. Heinlein book. I've heard of his books for so many years, and yet have been repelled from reading. I think the reason is that I was tucking these type of books away when I'm so sick of what is being released. Well I'm at that precise moment where I'm angry with the world, just wanting peace and calm and serenity. I don't understand why it isn't a more sought out virtue. I don't understand how people can want the death of so many people due to a religion Any religion.
So this has been taken out of the book box; maybe just maybe this can give me a better perspective.
Up to chapter 4 and I've already had a few good chuckles at this one. Through out the rest of the book I had quiet moments of reflection, loud moments of banging pots and pans around while washing them, and mulling over the latest political debacle, and now I am just truely grateful that Heinlein gave us the perspective and scope of this book.
I have quite a few quotes, from this book, that I liked.
~“There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men.”
This next quote should be self-explanatory. Any Goodreads users that live in the United States, at the moment, should read and reflect on this book with the oncoming elections of 2016.
~“Both for practical reasons and for mathematically verifiable moral reasons, authority and responsibility must be equal - else a balancing takes place as surely as current flows between points of unequal potential. To permit irresponsible authority is to sow disaster; to hold a man responsible for anything he does not control is to behave with blind idiocy. The unlimited democracies were unstable because their citizens were not responsible for the fashion in which they exerted their sovereign authority... other than through the tragic logic of history... No attempt was made to determine whether a voter was socially responsible to the extent of his literally unlimited authority. If he voted the impossible, the disastrous possible happened instead - and responsibility was then forced on him willy-nilly and destroyed both him and his foundation-less temple.”
I'll add more when I edit again. The next Heinlien book I'm planning to read is: Have Space Suit-Will Travel. Until then...
View all my reviews