logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: beria
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2016-10-12 22:05
Vozhd
Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar - Simon Sebag Montefiore

Montefiore's history of Jerusalem happened to be the first book I reviewed on Booklikes and I was happy to revisit the author with another one of his works. It seems that every time I pick up a history book in a book shop it is endorsed by Montefiore, he's clearly very passionate in his pursuit of historical knowledge. 

 

This book centres around Stalin and his changing inner circle. It's an odd blend of details of dinner functions, Stalin's character in calm times and the chronicles of the terror and his political brutality. It's a fascinating glimpse into the sycophantic fervour he fostered amongst his magnates and the cunning, horrific nature of his paranoid mind. I've given it five stars, because probably fittingly, after Kershaw's Hitler this is simply the best biography of a historical leader that I have read. 

 

Anyone who harbours any romanticism or flirts with the hard left I advise to read this and recognise the dangers of unswerving idealism, the dangers of being an illiberal bent on realising a utopia for humanity in the future at any cost to the people of this life. I had always thought that Stalin wasn't overly ideologically motivated, yet this book seeks to dispel that notion comparing the avidity of Stalin's belief in Marxism to that displayed in radical Islamists. 

 

Something touched upon in the book and spoken about in debates by Christopher Hitchens is the idea that the Tsar in Romanov times was the voice of God himself, understand that and you may be able to understand the cult of personality that Stalin was able to engineer and take advantage of. The idea of a strong, powerful leader was ingrained into Russian society and it is an interesting feature of the revolution, that despite its attempts to turn society on its head with the ultimate goal of Communism, the aura of leadership remained steadfast. 

 

It fascinated me that the sons and daughters of some of those murdered and tortured beyond repair on Stalin's orders still regarded him as a great leader. It is unfathomable to me that it is possible to inspire such unswerving loyalty amongst people. This is ultimately what draws me to these immensely flawed and yet ridiculously charismatic characters. There seems to be men and women who pop up from time to time under varying banners of ideology, be it religious/political who manage to cultivate vast followings and impact the course of human history through their actions.

 

And so I came to the end of the book having lived within the court of the red tsar through the eyes of his vicious inner circle and I was struck again by the surreal nature of it all. How terrifying is it? If you place enough power into the hands of the wrong person you can end up with a society in which an innocuous comment could result in years of torture and imprisonment or a painful death. How is it that a man so well read and intelligent as Stalin, uses that intelligence to create a cut throat, savage society in which even those closest to him are not safe from assassination? 

 

I guess my curiosity will never be sated.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2015-05-20 19:05
Target Churchill
Target Churchill - Warren Adler

I think (!!) I received a free download of this from somewhere in return for an honest review, but I've got so many TBR books in my KIndle amd my ePub reader and so many requests for reviews that I'm getting confused. If anyone else on BL has had a free download of this one, could they let me know?

 

The story opens with a vivid description of Beria's NKVD men replacing the SS in the wake of Zhukov's race across eastern Europe and into Germany: the one quite as bad as, perhaps even worse than, the other. General Dimitrov, a Georgian like Beria (and Stalin) has spotted someone he thinks might be useful among the SS men they are executing en masse (no POWs here!) – an SS Obersturmbannfuhrer and marksman named Franz Mueller, who is also a US citizen. Dimitrov tests his commitment by setting him to shoot two dozen of his erstwhile SS comrades and, that done, recruits him and sends him off to Washington to live quietly and await orders – just another one of Beria's countless moles spread out around the world.

 

Meanwhile, a disgruntled Churchill (having lost the UK election to Atlee, who is, in Churchill's view, soft on "Good old Uncle Jo" Stalin) has received an invitation to receive an honorary doctorate and make a speech at a minor American university in President Truman's home state. Believing as he does that Stalin and his cohorts represent quite as great a threat to peace and freedom as Hitler ever did – though very few people agree with him – Churchill decides to sieze the opportunity of a widely publicised event (Truman will be there on the platform with him) to warn the world about Stalin and communism as he once warned them about Hitler and nazism.

 

He composes one of his most famous speeches – it is the speech in which he introduces the phrase "the Iron Curtain" to posterity – but it is all to be kept under wraps until it is delivered. He does not want the Russians upset and Truman embarrassed in advance (Truman and Stalin are still oficially allies). However, the First Secretary at the British Embassy in Washington (the man who runs the show) is a certain Donald Maclean (click on the name if it doesn't ring a bell) and Maclean arranges matters so that his master in Moscow (Beria) receives a copy of the speech long enough in advance for the mole (now Frank Miller) to be activated: Target – Churchill.

 

I have probably given away more of the plot than I should, but it doesn't matter, you can get all this and more from the blurb and the many reviews around. What matters is the detail, especially the bringing to life of Churchill as he was in 1946, immediately after the end of the war. Revered throughout the world (where he wasn't reviled) yet rejected in his own country and out of power, but certainly not impotent, for the pen is mightier than the sword and a great wordsmith ("the greatest wordsmith of the century") he could still compose speeches that would alter history. Which was why, in the view of the Russians, he had to be silenced.

 

HIghly recommended for all lovers of WWII fiction. 

Like Reblog Comment
review 2011-10-02 00:00
Beria: Stalin's First Lieutenant
Beria: Stalin's First Lieutenant - Amy Knight A fairly short, dry (i.e., not terribly interesting) "revisionist" (by the author's own account) history, purporting to show that Beria -- despite certain flaws (like being a mass murderer and serial rapist) -- loved his son and was the reformer, while Khrushchev (who had Lavrenti murdered... in cold blood)... was actually the totalitarian.

Proof that scholarship abhors a vacuum.

Specialists may find the book of more use.
More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?