logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: books-about-books
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2017-10-14 01:23
The Golden Age of Murder
The Golden Age of Murder - Martin Edwards

What started out strong for the first couple of parts, started struggling towards the middle and by the end it strongly resembled the book that was soon to follow it: The Story of Classic Crime in 100 Books; with paragraphs and chapters stuffed with titles and authors.

 

Still, it's all relative, because The Golden Age of Murder remains very readable and very interesting from start to finish.  It just wasn't as strong at the end as it was at the beginning and as a result, my 4 star rating of what I thought was going to be a 5 star read.

 

A few minor things did bother me though, in no particular order:

 

- Edwards assumes the reader knows their dates.  This reader is crap with dates, but excellent at reading comprehension, so usually an author gives a date and I can infer the dates of later events.  BUT Edwards bounces back and forth on the timeline, so he'll give a date, but then refer back to earlier events for a few paragraphs, then bounce ahead to future events, never stating any additional dates.  This became painfully irritating when he started discussing King Edward's abdication, as he bounced between events that happened before his coronation, after his abdication, during his reign, etc.  

 

I should not need supplementary reading in order to make Edwards' narrative flow correctly.

 

- Edwards' bias for some authors over others is pretty obvious.  Which is ok - although I question how ok when someone is aiming to write an authoritative historical text.  His contempt for Christianna Brand is glaring and he's outright snarky about the Coles' political beliefs, coming just short of calling them hypocrites.  He seems to start out liking Anthony Berkeley, but by the end it's all pity, and perhaps a polite disgust (to be fair, I'm not sure there's much else to feel about Berkeley by the end, it sounds like his was a life wasted for want of a good psychiatrist).  

 

He treated Christie the most objectively, and towards the end goes so far as to offer up some very rational theories for her 11 day disappearance, but at all times it's clear he has a lot of respect and admiration for her.  But Edwards saves the most blatant bias for Dorothy L. Sayers; I'd go so far as to speculate that he crushes on Sayers.  He's downright romantic about her throughout the book, constantly reminding the reader about her deep, dark secret and the heavy burden of guilt and responsibility she always carried with her, not to mention that drunken lout of a husband she had strung 'round her neck her whole life.  And that leads me to my last gripe:

 

 - Towards the end, Edwards does that thing that drives me insane: he speculates ahead of the facts and presents it as truth.  It's not often (maybe he just rushed the end?), but several times he presents his interpretation of a book's themes, or an author's motivation, as truth without providing evidence.  

 

The most egregious example was in the last chapter when he (again) tells the reader how big a burden Sayers carried with her throughout her life. I'm going to put the rest of it in a spoiler tag; skip the spoiler if you know nothing at all about Sayers and would like to find out for yourself, or if you just don't care that much about the whole thing, because I do go on and on.

 

 

He addresses the question: Why, after Mac finally adopted John Anthony, did she not bring John Anthony home to live with them?  He tells the reader it is her guilt and fear of public shame over her youthful indiscretion that prohibited her from doing so.  

 

Nobody knows why she didn't bring him home, because she never once wrote about John Anthony or discussed John Anthony with anybody.  Ever.  Not even John Anthony.

 

But if I were in Sayers shoes, shame/guilt/embarrassment might have had a place in my reasoning, but they would be dwarfed by the fact that I was married to a great big alcoholic who suffered from great big mood swings and PTSD, and I was never home.  Edwards' romantic notions of self-flagellation via guilt and shame is nonsense.  A much more rational theory is that Sayers didn't want to pull John Anthony out of a happy home environment he was born into so she could stuff him in a house as dysfunctional and unhappy as the one she was living in, just so she could come out of the closet as a mom.

 

I don't doubt for a second that Martin Edwards knows his stuff - far, far better than I know it, but he's trying to make Sayers into a tragic, romantic heroine that frankly from what he's told me about her personality in this book, would sicken her if she heard it.  It's not logical to think that someone who was as pragmatic as Sayers was would suddenly go all romantic about her son.  By the time Mac stepped up, there was no chance of righting history, so why try?  Pragmatically, she did everything she legally could to legitimise John Anthony, and the best decision for John Anthony by that point was to let him keep the happy home he already had.  But that's just my opinion; for all anyone knows she might just have liked not having to be a mom in more than name.  We'll never know and it irritates me that Edwards claims he does.   ::end of rant::

(spoiler show)

 

 

Overall, an excellent book for anyone interested in the Golden Age of crime fiction, even if it does lose a bit of steam towards the end.  I'd unhesitatingly recommend it to mystery lovers who want to know more.  Or to those I think have TBRs that need beefing up!  ;-)

 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2017-10-10 05:31
Reading progress update: I've read 280 out of 481 pages.
The Golden Age of Murder - Martin Edwards

Part III felt like the driest part of the book so far; I admit my mind wandered more often through these chapters as Edwards felt like he was going through the motions with some of it.  This could just be me though, struggling to connect with names I've never heard of until recently.

 

He's also very heavy handed with Sayers' "secret shame"; he mentions it so often, so explicitly, that I'm left wondering if Edwards is a man who would keep your secret, but remind you of his discretion and generosity at every available opportunity.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2017-10-09 04:05
Scribbles in the Margins: 50 Eternal Delights of Books
Scribbles in the Margins: 50 Eternal Delights of Books - Daniel Gray

As the author states at the beginning the book's purpose is to give the reader reasons to be joyful, or at least smile.  As such, this is a book of 50 short essays about the different joys of books: owning them, reading them, giving them, shelving them.  Defacing Writing in them.

 

The writing is a bit flowery - think G.K. Chesterton lite - but still (or because of, depending on your feelings about Chesterton's style) a joy to read.  My personal favourite was "Sneaking new books past loved ones" as I found that one a tiny bit more relevant than the others.  ;-)

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2017-10-07 11:01
Reading progress update: I've read 174 out of 481 pages.
The Golden Age of Murder - Martin Edwards

Having finished Part II, the narrative continues to keep me thoroughly hooked.  The more I learn about Christie and Sayers, the more I realise how back-to-front I got their two personalities.  Berkeley continues to put me off, but I'm more determined than ever to find some of Ronald Knox's work.

 

What surprises me most is the number of printing errors I'm finding - I swear I don't mean to be nit-picky but I do expect a book of this calibre to be better copy-edited.  I'm more than willing to overlook a missing conjunction or article here and there – sh*t happens – but in one spot it appears sh*t actually happens, as Martin quotes Dorothy L. Sayers as saying, in correspondence with Robert Eustace (her co-writer of Documents in the Case):

 

[...]If possible the trap should poop off while the villain is away in Town, or something.

 

Unless there's a whole scatological side to British slang I've so far not been introduced to, this is the kind of error it's hard to imagine getting past so many different sets of eyes.

 

It was funny though; imagining Sayers saying poop off.  

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2017-10-06 05:27
Reading progress update: I've read 107 out of 481 pages.
The Golden Age of Murder - Martin Edwards

Taking away nothing from The Story of Classic Crime in 100 Books – because for what it is and what it's meant to be, it is excellent – but this Martin Edwards book is eminently more readable.  This is a narrative history of the golden age of murder and The Detection Club through small biographies of the founding members.  It's very easy to read, but I'm surprised to find myself only 20% of the way through; given the amount of time I've spent with it, I'd normally be much further along.  I take this as evidence that the writing and the subject matter are absorbing enough to slow me down so I can take it all in.

 

Random thoughts after finishing Part 1:  Sayers sooooo not what I was expecting.  I think I'd have liked her, but she might have been a little too mercenary, even for me (I find her reaction to Conan Doyle's passing ... cold).   Archie Christie was an ass, but I think I already knew that.  Berkeley... I'm getting the feeling no one ever really knew what to think of him and I do mean not one soul, which is regrettable.  But also - jonesing after your brother's wife... not cool.

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?