logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
Discussion: Asshat Updates
posts: 15 views: 69714 last post: 10 years ago
created by: Indie Angie
back to group
Just today Anne Rice blocked me from commenting on her FB page and unfriended me because I'm suing STGRB. I thought that was incredibly petty of her.
(hide spoiler) (show spoiler)

Ah, so it’s that Emma. The one who is deeply offended by the term “attention whore,” but thinks the R-word is perfectly acceptable. Yes, that Emma has a very different view of “good Karma” than the rest of our modern society. No wonder she feels at home on Snot.
BBA alert: Awe-thor Elle Davis is harassing Khanh on multiple reviews on goofreads and posting the ever same BS.

(hide spoiler) (show spoiler)

See Khanh´s post for links and info.
Reply to post #1374 (show post):

This Elle chick reeks of a dork pulling a publicity stunt. The best solution is to ignore her.
I used to be able to click on the link and read GR posts as since I was kick off GR I can't comment but now apparently one has to sign in even when provided with the link.
Reply to post #1376 (show post):

Angela, I noticed that too. It's not possible to make full page SS, so I made SS of a few of Davis's comments.

(hide spoiler)


(show spoiler)

Last year, this method of gaining attention by attacking reviews belonging to other authors' books was used by Emma Paul and G.D. Steel. This way they can claim they've never attacked "their" readers. In Davis's case, her books are on sale and she's looking for free attention. I guess attacking readers and playing victim is cheaper than real marketing.
I still don't understand why we the reading public is supposed to be "of service" to any author. Should it not be the other way round?
Reply to post #1375 (show post):

Nawh, not a publicity stunt, rather an ignorant, clueless but arrogant wanna be with no common sense.

Blog post by Elle Davis: Free Speech

Since she names Khanh twice, it will be deleted soon. Here is the screenshot.
Reply to post #1379 (show post):

I'm telling you, CG. This stinks of a publicity stunt.

1) Find a recent victim of Snot.
2) Attack the reviews of the reader. (Already deleted by GR support)
3) Write a blog, exaggerating the whole situation. (Already deleted by GR support)
4) Enjoy a humping session from Snot. (hide spoiler) (show spoiler)
5) Fade into oblivion after swapping five stars with Juicy and her sheep.

Oh, and WTH is with asshats and their need to capitalize common nouns?

Certainly didn't take Juicy long to get back to her personal attacks and racism.
(hide spoiler) (show spoiler)

Snot states authors have every right to attack readers in their spaces. Yet if readers come to the authors' blogs, the meanies should be blocked. If a reader writes a review attacking an author, it should be deleted from GR. If an author writes a blog attacking a reader and it's deleted from GR, this is proof of the injustice in the world. Makes perfect Juicy sense.

Of course with Davis and Juicy humping, we should begin counting down to the exchange of five stars. Three, two, one...
Juicy has a certain way of writing about a particular racial group. Hmm...

(hide spoiler)


(show spoiler)
Juicy Be Good, here's a little help from one of our whisperers. It's allowed, not aloud. Homophones can be tricky.

(hide spoiler) (show spoiler)

Juicy seems to have more than one Emma floating around her sphere of suck. The one with the handle "Emma's" doesn't seem to know which "R-word" I mentioned a few days ago.

(hide spoiler) (show spoiler)

Well, Emma's, there's another Emma who wrote this and she wasn't talking about respect. She was high fiving Mysti Parker who casually used an offensive word.

Emma's, you might want to use a different handle, so you're not confused with the vile Emma who also wrote this, this, and this.

As you can see, that Emma is a very angry and judgmental chick. Yeah, change your handle, Emma's, before you get confused with the hateful Emma.
Emma's has a point. The people who think they have the right to dictate who reviews, who comments and who can speak their disapproval of things THEY find inappropriate are the problem.

Couldn't have said it better myself. Seeing as how STGRB allowed this comment to be published, I assume they'll be shutting down soon? After all, the above statement is clearly about them.
Snot update! Juicy Be Good fixed her typos and now knows the proper spelling for allowed. Nice to see her listening to her critics. :)

Edit: A reader pointed out Juicy still has allowed misspelled. Oops!

(hide spoiler) (show spoiler)
Hey, Juicy Be Good, since you're reading this, did you mean to misspell Ricardo Montalban's name? You know like you messed up allowed? Our whisperer spotted your oops. You're welcome.

(hide spoiler) (show spoiler)

Edit: She fixed that too. Awesome work, Juicy.
Need help?