logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: referendum
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2015-05-21 15:58
Stephen and Russ from the Equals Series discuss Marriage Equality

Guest post by Brigham Vaughn Featuring Stephen and Russ from Equals as they discuss Marriage Equality

 

With the Marriage Equality Referendum in Ireland only a day away it seemed like the perfect opportunity to have two recently married, fictional, men I’ve come to adore discuss marriage and what it means to them. Thankfully Brigham Vaughn was generous enough to add more work to her already stretched schedule and bring Stephen and Russ out of retirement to share their thoughts with us. I invite you to enjoy the following scene and will meet you again on the other side.

 

****

 

“Did you hear about the marriage referendum in Ireland?” Russ asked.

 

Stephen glanced from his iPad to the television screen but there were baseball highlights on, so he had no idea what Russ was talking about.  “Hmm?” 

 

Russ turned his phone toward Stephen to show him an article on The New York Times site. “This Friday, there’s a vote on marriage equality in Ireland.  The article about it’s really interesting.”

 

“Oh? What about it?”

 

“Well, I find it interesting that it’s being put to the popular vote rather than being debated by the government.  It’s great though; there seems to be a ton of support for it. Polls are showing 70% of citizens are in favor.”

 

“Wow.”  Stephen flipped the case on his iPad closed and reached out to brush his fingertips across his husband’s knee.  Although he and Russ had legally been married in South Carolina nine months before, they were still waiting on the Supreme Court decision which would affect whether it would be recognized by the state of Georgia.  The waiting was driving him crazy although he was more patient than Russ.  “That is impressive. I wouldn’t have expected there to be that much support.”

 

Russ’ grin was wry. “You assume the worst about people, Stephen.”

 

“Probably,” he admitted. “But I’ve seen the worst of them.”

 

It wasn’t something he’d talked about much with Russ—at least not on a regular basis—but in his forty-eight years on the planet, he’d seen plenty of discrimination in his lifetime: from his own family, his neighbors, co-workers, and random people on the street.  He’d lived through a time where people were afraid to touch gay men for fear of contracting HIV, he’d seen acquaintances die of AIDS.  He’d seen people fired for being “out” at work, couples kicked out of apartments, and men and women beaten for loving someone of the same sex. 

 

He was still astounded by the fact that marriage equality existed.  To realize more people—here in the United States and in many places around the globe—supported equal marriage than opposed it was breathtaking.  He’d spent so much of his life feeling like an outsider; it was difficult to trust that he had allies now, people fighting for his rights even though they had no stake in the matter. 

 

With a sad smile, Russ moved closer, shifting so he faced Stephen.  “The world’s getting better though. Think about how much has changed in the past ten years.”

 

“I know. I’ve changed a lot in that time too.”  Stephen took Russ’ hand, gently twisting the ring on his finger. “Where the idea of marriage seemed completely logical to you, it took me a lot longer to get to that point.” Nearly two decades younger, Russ had grown up in a different world than him.  Although not as different as either of them would like.

 

 “You don’t have to remind me,” Russ said drily.  “I remember.”

 

Stephen cracked a smile.  “I’m just saying that if it took me—a gay man who’s been out, well, nearly as long as you’ve been alive—time to come to terms with the idea of marriage, I can’t expect straight people to accept it overnight either.”

 

“I can,” Russ grumbled, but Stephen knew he was kidding.  Mostly.  Russ believed in absolutes, but Stephen’s views of the world around them were more nuanced.  Was it age? Experience? Simply their personalities? Maybe all of them combined.

 

“Hey, I’d be thrilled if I woke up tomorrow and there was global equality for everyone in the LGBT community,” Stephen pointed out, “but I’m realistic.  That’s not going to happen. It’s one step at a time, state by state, country by country, issue by issue.  The vote in Ireland’s a huge step, but it’s still just one step, same with the Supreme Court decision here in the U.S., We’ll get there, but not today or tomorrow. We have to keep fighting.”

 

Russ nodded and leaned back, resting his knee on Stephen thigh. “You’re right.  I’m just ready for that to happen now.”

 

“We can hope it’ll happen in our lifetime, but it may not.  Maybe if your sister has children, it’ll happen for them. I have hope.”

 

Russ fell silent as he returned to reading the article.  Stephen didn’t open his tablet again though, preferring to look at the man who’d opened him up to a whole new world.  Without him, Stephen might have wound up stuck in a life that was simply “good enough,” never hoping for more than a partner, never believing he deserved marriage and a husband.  That was the real joy of marriage equality: finding hope. 

 

“I wonder if the people who oppose gay couples getting married ever realize exactly how boring we are?” Russ said after a few moments, still looking down at the screen on his phone.

 

Stephen grinned.  “Who are you calling boring?”

 

Russ looked up and snorted. “Come on. When it comes right down to it—in this way anyway—we’re just like straight couples.”

 

“There’s something to be said for the quiet tranquility of domestic bliss,” Stephen pointed out.

 

“True.  I’m just saying it’s a Friday night and we’re on the sofa watching baseball highlights and reading the news.”

 

“Was that a hint that I should find something to spice up our evening?” Stephen asked, knowing full well Russ was just teasing him.

 

Russ grabbed the front of his shirt and pulled him forward. “No. But now that you mention it, I think it’s time I make some demands: kiss me, husband.”

 

Leaning in, Stephen grinned even wider. “With pleasure,” he murmured against Russ’ lips.

 

 

Every day and for the rest of our lives, he silently promised.

 

 

  • Disclaimer: As I wrote this I realized there was a timing problem. Based on the timeline I had set in my head, Russ and Stephen’s wedding actually took place in September of 2015 so this article/discussion wouldn't have taken place. If you ignore that teeny, tiny issue, Russ and Stephen fans can take this outtake as canon for the story and as a glimpse into their happy married life.

 

****

 

Article link: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/18/opinion/irelands-marriage-equality-moment.html?_r=0

 

If this is the first time you meet Stephen and Russ and now find yourself curious about how exactly these two men came to the point where we found them, you’ll be delighted to know you can read their full story in four wonderful and beautifully written novellas which can be found on Amazon by clicking on their titles below:

 

Equals             Partners               Family                Husbands

 

If you prefer to read your stories on paper you’ll be happy when I tell you these four titles will soon be released in two paperbacks. I can’t provide you with buy links yet but am in the privileged situation where I can share the covers and back blurbs with you.

 

                  

  

About the Author:

 

Brigham Vaughn has always been a voracious reader with her own stories to tell. After many years of abandoned plots, something finally clicked. Now she’s eating, sleeping, and breathing writing and is excited to have finally figured out what she wants to be when she grows up. In the little time that isn’t spent writing or reading, she loves cooking, yoga, photography, and remodeling her ninety-year-old home. Brigham lives in Michigan with her three cats and an amazing husband who has always been her biggest champion.

 



Visit Brigham’s website for more information about the books I mentioned above as well as her other titles and some free stories:https://brighamvaughn.wordpress.com/

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2015-01-01 11:05
My Open Letter to Those who Oppose Marriage Equality

 

 

 

Here’s my question for you. Do you have a child/children? What if your child came home and told you he/she had fallen for and wanted to make their life with a same sex partner? Would you tell them that from that moment forward they were only second class citizens? Would you tell them they suddenly weren’t good enough to get married anymore, didn’t deserve the same rights, obligations and opportunities as everybody else? Would you, who has – I assume - always known your child as a loving and smart individual, suddenly feel they’re no longer capable of lovingly raising a child of their own? Could you feel these things about your own offspring? Would you be able to say those things to their face?

 

If the answer to those questions is yes you are probably less qualified to raise children than the person you are judging, could ever be. Think about it. Same sex couples are never going to have an accidental child. The chances of them forgetting to use contraception and ending up with an unplanned pregnancy as a result, are nil. These couples face a long and arduous journey if they decide they want to create a family. There will be medical and/or legal procedures to face, administrative red tape to battle and a waiting time much longer than the nine months the rest of us deal with.

 

I have another question. Do you think marriage equality shouldn’t be allowed because the purpose of marriage is to procreate? And/or do you think same sex couples shouldn’t be allowed to adopt or raise children because every child deserves to be raised by two loving parents of different genders? If your answer to those questions is affirmative I would like to know how you think we should deal with women who find themselves raising children on their own? Should we take those children and put them in a family where they will have both a father and a mother? Or maybe we should force anyone who isn’t married to use contraception so no child will ever be born unless their heterosexual parents are actually married? And what about infertile couples? Should we even allow them to marry if the purpose of marriage is to procreate?

 

I’ve heard people say that marriage equality diminishes their own marriage. My mind boggles. I’m sure enough in my marriage, the love for my husband and the love he has for me, his wife, to know that nothing outside the two of us can either diminish or enhance the quality of our bond. If your marriage and the way you feel about it depends on outside factors it makes me feel sorry about the state of your relationship. Marriage isn’t and shouldn’t be a privilege only granted to those who happen to be the majority. Marriage is the expression of the love between two people. Marriage means that those two people will automatically have rights (and obligations) they might otherwise not have or only be able to safeguard through long and often expensive legal proceedings.

 

Maybe you are convinced people choose to fall for people of their own gender and feel that they should just choose differently in order to avoid the issues of marriage and raising children. If that is your belief I’d like you to explain to me why you think anyone would do that to themselves? You’d have to be a rather hardened masochist to inflict the sort of prejudice, discrimination and complications that come with a same sex relationship on yourself. Did you decide to fall for the person you love right now or was it something magical, a wonderful moment that took you by surprise and filled you with joy? And if the latter, why do you think it would be any different for other people?

 

If you have any doubts about marriage equality. If you feel that civil partnership should be enough, ask yourself whether or not civil partnership would be enough for you? Would you have been happy forgoing your wedding day? I’d also ask you to watch a documentary called ‘Bridegroom’ and then come back to me and tell me love isn’t love. That losing the person you’d hoped to spend the rest of your life with hurts less just because both partners were the same gender. Watch that movie and tell me you still believe certain rights should only apply to those who are heterosexual.


There is so much hate and pain in the world. Why can’t we just embrace love when we meet it and facilitate its smooth progress? Love experienced by others can never diminish the love we feel. More love and tolerance can only make our world a better place. Open your mind and your heart. Live and let live. Love and let love.

 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2014-08-26 10:51
The Fish slaps back in round Two

Scottish independence: Salmond scores

 

Link to video: Salmond and Darling in lively second TV debate on Scottish independence

Alex Salmond staged a dramatic fightback in the Scottish independence campaign after mounting repeated attacks on the credibility of no campaign leader Alistair Darling in a bloody confrontation in advance of next month's referendum.

 

Round 1 is here

Edinburgh Uni - FutureLearn

 

 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2014-08-06 10:01
In the first televised round the fish has been slapped by the darling
 
In readiness for my course on Scottish Independence from Edinburgh university I'm taking notes: the opening round was about filthy lucre and needless to say it was heated AND the live streaming from STV failed.
 
 
Scottish independence advocates are “deluding” themselves if they believe that the country would be allowed to remain in a currency union with the UK whilst controlling its own financial affairs, one of Europe’s major banks has said.
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2013-10-04 23:38
Review - Road to the Referendum by Iain McWhirter
Road to Referendum - Iain Macwhirter

As a Scot I'll be casting my vote when the Referendum for Independence takes place next year and although I keep up to date fairly well with as much debate as I can on the matter I was interested to read Mr McWhirter's 'take' on it all. There's no doubt he knows his stuff and he's written this book to tie in with the STV program aired recently and it makes very interesting reading.

How we got where we are today and all that the road ahead entails for us is clearly laid out and despite being a serious matter it's written with humour and wit, while still paying attention to details. There's such a lot of Scotland's history in the pages and I suspect it would make an interesting read even for non Scots.

The question which will be on the Ballot form is "Should Scotland be an independent country?" so there's not a lot of ambiguity there, it's a 'yes' or 'no' answer. However, in order to make an informed choice voters need to know what the pro's and con's are of voting one way in favour of the other and that's what makes this whole referendum like a leap of faith for some. Nobody can say with absolute surety what lies ahead for Scotland. This book though, goes a long way towards helping Scottish voters (and anyone else who has an interest in these matters) gain a better understanding of what has gone before and what may lie ahead, depending on which way the voting goes. It's fascinating stuff.

I already know which way I'll be voting but after reading this book I feel I have a much better understanding of much of the devolution debates which previously went above my head at times. It's a marvelous book and one I can see myself dipping into again and again over the coming year, and probably beyond.

Next year will be all about making informed choices and I urge anyone in a position to vote in next year's Referendum to arm themselves with as much information as they can find.

 

 

Note: I received a free copy of this title from the publisher.

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?