Reply to post #19
(show post):
I don't think it's necessarily a narrower definition - at least I don't think so - I think, at least for me, I can see how it can turn into a slippery slope though, without some sort of clear guidelines.
To use an example that is not on the list, The Girls of Atomic City seems on the face of it to be a book about science and the race for atomic supremacy, but having read it, I can say it's only about 10% science and 90% history. It's a decent book, but those looking for science would possibly be disappointed.
I'm trying to go through all the books in our voting list and make sure they all have full summaries so members voting on books get as much information as possible - I figure the votes themselves will sort out the rest.