logo
Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
Discussion: ARCHIVED: Forensics: Preface and chapters 1-4
posts: 15 views: 618 last post: 7 years ago
created by: Murder by Death
back to group back to club
Reply to post #17 (show post):

Giant minions, more like, in Australia ...
Reply to post #18 (show post):

Probably the size of small dogs up in Queensland, where everything wants to kill you. ;-) Here they're smaller than the ones we had back home and praise ALL that is holy, they're wingless. But they're still satan's pets...
Reply to post #19 (show post):

My extremely unreliable memory invokes images of creatures the size of miniature bats -- but yes, definitely Satan's minions at every size.
I've been doing some chapter-by-chapter posting so far and my opinion's fairly middling so far. Chapter three wasn't bad, but one, two, and four weren't very fun.
Reply to post #21 (show post):

I suppose it also depends on how much new information you get out of the book. Most of the books is covered in TV series like Bones and NCIS/ CSI... so it's all "old hat"?
Reply to post #22 (show post):

There might be something in that. But those shows don't necessarily get the science "right".
I'm well stuck into chapter 3 now and I'm liking it best so far for both intonation and writing style. This feels like it meets my expectations for the entire book. I hope it'll keep moving upwards as the chapters go by.
Reply to post #24 (show post):

If the whole book were written like chapter 3, I don't think I'd be complaining about it.
Reply to post #23 (show post):

McDermit doesn't go into enough detail about the science to contradict anything on the TV shows - the few I have watched anyway.
I like the history that Mcdermid presents through the cases, but do wish that there was more science in it rather than the mere re-telling of cases.

Btw, I couldn't face stopping reading the book for a couple of weeks while you're all discussing this, so I got a kindle version...which is progressing nicely - thanks to the travel-induced "oh god, why am I up in the middle of the night" type of madness.
Reply to post #27 (show post):

Yes, the history can be interesting, as I admitted in the comments to one of my posts. I'm feeling short-changed on the science end, though. It's like she gives up once she gets to the present day in some cases.
Well, I finally started this last night and as far as I can see I don't have much to add to what you guys have said so far, but by and large ... color me more impressed with the writing as such than with the contents.
I just finished it and, well, that was ... not what I hoped for.

Now, I'm left wondering if this book was really that much better than Gulp.
Maybe just a little.
The writing was definitely better.
And, McDermid kinda delivered on the topics that she gave each chapter but that should be the rule in non-fiction anyway.

Full review to come.
Reply to post #30 (show post):

Yep. Seems we're feeling pretty similar about this.
Reply to post #9 (show post):

JL, I sampled the audiobook a couple of days ago when investigating options for travel. I decided against the audiobook, tho. The accent (Scottish, at least for the Audible sample) was fine with me, but the intonation sounded very sensationalist (in fact, it reminded me of every Neil Oliver documentary I have ever hated) and I thought this was less so in the written format.

Need help?