Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: Robert-D-Kaplan
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2015-02-03 19:38
Nowości - luty 2015


Długie, mroźne wieczory zdecydowanie sprzyjają lekturze. Czemu zatem nie sięgnąć po jedną z lutowych nowości? W tym miesiącu zdecydowanie warto sięgnąć po reportaże (wydawnictwo Czarne w dalszym ciągu nas pod tym względem rozpieszcza), choć i miłośnicy historii oraz literatury amerykańskiej XX wieku również będą zadowoleni. Fani architektury również powinni wybrać się w tym miesiącu do księgarni, gdzie znajdą aż dwie architektoniczne nowości od wydawnictwa Karakter.


Zapraszam do mojego autorskiego przeglądu.


Read more
Like Reblog Comment
review 2014-08-15 00:00
The Nothing that Is: A Natural History of Zero
The Nothing that Is: A Natural History of Zero - Robert M. Kaplan,Ellen Kaplan There are different ways to use and think about mathematical concepts and they do not all leave a historical record in a form that can be interpreted with certainty. The gap between people engaged in trade and those indulging in philosophy has been especially important, notably for the ancient Greeks, whose philosophers used geometry to think mathematically and despised the mere counting required for trade. Others have used sand or beads or counting boards or diverse tools in which the technique for even complex calculations did not necessarily entail a corresponding grasp of the theory or the concepts at work. In such cases, zero might arise and vanish repeatedly without making an impression on the way people thought about numbers. The key fact is that we do not know what they were thinking unless we can find a record.

Although we can find written number systems as old as the Sumerians, 5,000 years ago, in which we see zero at work, it is used in unexpected ways. They appear to require a form of zero to indicate “nothing in this column” - for which there is a record at Kush dated to 700BC - but it is used only in the middle and never at the end of numbers. So they cannot distinguish between 2, 20 and 200. The ancient Greeks - from the Fifth Century BC - used their letters as symbols first for numbers 1 to 9, then tens up to 90, then hundreds up to 900, but had no letter as a symbol for zero. They seem to have incorporated zero first after invading the Babylonian Empire in 331 BC. There is good evidence, which Kaplan reviews, that the Greeks in turn passed the concept to India. Kaplan spends some time debunking claims that the Indians invented zero, insisting that their valid claims are already remarkable and do not need the additional support of being exaggerated. Why deprive Zero of its much longer history?

Kaplan says very early on that “we count by giving different number names to different sized heaps of things.” In places this is as much a history of 1 as a history of zero, discussing the different ways people group stuff into units. The Sumerians used units, tens and sixties for example. Archimides named vast large numbers by working with myriads and myriad -myriads, which could be of the first order or the second order. Until 1971, England worked with units of 12 pennies to one shilling, twenty shillings to one pound. We still have sixty seconds to a minute, sixty minutes to an hour, twenty four hours to a day, seven days to a week and so on .. Kaplan devotes a chapter also to Mayan number systems, with a range of cyclical calendars all seeking to defer the end of time. They took their obsession with counting to extremes.

Kaplan argues that up to this point in the history of numbers, the principle remained valid that there was a correspondence between numbers and things, such that there would be no consideration given to the notion that zero / nothing / void / empty was a thing in need of a name in the way other numbers were. But Indian mathematics achieved a “paradigm shift” which focused on how numbers behaved instead of what numbers were. Such behaviour took place in equations, where the solution (the number which made the equation balance) was as likely to be zero as any other number. The names of numbers were contracted to written symbols, including symbols for operations (plus, minus, equals, squared), which could be used yet often not visualised (what would x squared look like?). Indeed, for the first time it became reasonable to deal with negative numbers as well as positive ones. Numbers no longer named or described objects but became objects themselves to which adjectives could be attached: positive, negative, natural, rational, real. “The change in mathematics we’ve been following, where the names for numbers narrow down to signs of them and the numbers themselves are subordinated to the laws they obey, began when someone first counted and evolved through the ongoing project of deriving these laws from as thrifty a set of axioms as mathematicians could manage.”

It was through Islam and the Arabic language that Indian mathematics was transmitted to China, Russia and Western Europe, the latter by 970 AD. Kaplan gives credit for this but does not suggest that the Arabs transformed Indian maths in any fundamental way. Perhaps this impression arises through the specific focus of this book on Zero. In any case, Europeans struggled with many aspects of the new approach to mathematics. For all the crushing difficulty of using existing methods, there were a lot of new concepts to absorb in Arabic (or “Saracen”) methods, and for counting itself Europeans could make good use of the abacus to meet their practical needs. Kaplan suggests that the major breakthrough for Zero was after 1340, when Pacioli introduced the novelty of double entry book-keeping, in which Zero held the essential balance between credits and debits, positive and negative.

Yet it was not in counting that Zero had its crucial impact. It remained the case that counting with an abacus was much faster and more efficient that using the quill to apply the Saracen techniques. Kaplan writes: “Wordless manipulation will carry you with dash and glory to the outermost edges of arithmetic - but it will leave you stranded once you cross the border into algebra and all the lands of mathematics that lie beyond. There thought travels by signs laced into a language that can speak even about itself…. This language came into its own when zero entered it as the sign for an operation: the operation of changing a digit’s value by shifting its place.”

Kaplan proceeds in the remainder of his book to explore diverse ways in which the role of zero has been significant in the development of mathematical ideas. This is not material to read with a passive attitude - it requires effort and patience from the reader. His explanations unfold very logically to give insights into the power - but also the confusing nature - of this surprising number.

The book does not demand a knowledge of difficult mathematics but it sadly does demand a willingness to read difficult prose that is sometimes too dense and to wade through his laboured humour and philosophising in places where that just confuses things. The result for me was that I literally nodded off to sleep on occasion. In the end, I also found it necessary to speed read through the book for a second time, just to clarify what it was about. It made more sense in retrospect than it had done at the time of first reading. Maybe that suggests that the book had a great idea which called for more editing before it was released into the wild. It could have been a lot better. A heavy read and a struggle but all the same, interesting stuff and filled with unexpected gems.

Like Reblog Comment
text 2013-11-03 12:25
Między nami
Bukareszt. Kurz i krew - Małgorzata Rejmer

Nie wiem czy natrafiłam w mediach na jakąkolwiek krytyczną uwagę dotyczącą tej książki, co było nieco niepokojące ponieważ to sytuacja niezdrowa. Porównanie może niezbyt trafne ale to samo zdarzyło się w przypadku Wyznaję Cabre i Ostatniego rozdania Myśliwskiego. Lepiej gdy wypowiadają się obie strony - wtedy wiadomo, że będzie można podyskutować. Jednak nie bacząc na czerwone światełko mrugające w mojej głowie, ochoczo zabrałam się do lektury. Malutka to książeczka ale niestety bardzo nierówna. Niektóre rozdziały nie pozwalają na chwilę oddechu, inne z kolei nużą i męczą. W rezultacie troszkę wody upłynęło zanim z lekką ulgą odłożyłam książkę na półkę.

Dwie refleksje nasunęły mi się po lekturze. Po pierwsze ciekawie było poczytać coś z polskiej perspektywy o kraju, który nigdy nie leżał w kręgu moich zainteresowań, a podobnie jak Polska doświadczył niejednego. Bo Rumunia to nie tylko Nicolae Ceaușescu i jego szalone pomysły z zakresu polityki prorodzinnej i architektury. To także interesujący ludzie, bogata historia i piękne krajobrazy. Małgorzata Rejmer stara się zaprezentować czytelnikowi każdy z tych aspektów. Przez całą lekturę towarzyszą nam m.in. watahy bezpańskich psów, które są przygnębiającą pozostałością po czasach gdy pan i władca Ceaușescu wymyślił i częściowo zmaterializował Dom Ludu. Ta wielowarstwowość i spojrzenie z kilku perspektyw wciąga i fascynuje.




Druga uwaga: Bukareszt. Krew i kurz za mało uwagi poświęca samemu miastu. No chyba, że przyjmiemy założenie, że Bukareszt to Dom Ludu. Bo tego przykładu architektonicznego ego jest w książce aż nadto. Rozumiem, że autorka buduje na tej podstawie rumuńską martyrologię, której czasami jest aż za dużo. I to mi przeszkadzało - za dużo martyrologii a za mało chłodnego oglądu. Literatura dotycząca epoki komunizmu przyzwyczaiła nas do brutalnych opisów traktowania szarych obywateli i więźniów reżimu. Małgorzata Rejmer nie unika tego tematu. Mówi o Rumunach: fataliści.  Rozmawia z nimi o dobrych i złych czasach.

Ta książka to ciekawe spojrzenie na historię narodu uwikłanego w historię. I warto po nią sięgnąć. Jednak nie zaspokoiła mojej ciekawości. Kiedyś udało się to Robertowi D. Kaplanowi w Bałkańskich upiorach. Jeśli chcecie poznać mniej martyrologiczne podejście bardzo zachęcam.


Like Reblog Comment
review 2013-09-26 00:00
Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power
Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power - Robert D. Kaplan 4/5; probably only Robert D. Kaplan could have done it-- circle the Indian Ocean and use it as the hinge point for an exploration of both history and futurology. will the monsoon ocean be flooded with three Indian flat-tops, 2 Chinese, as well as cruisers from Australia, Japan, South Korea, and the U.S.? Kaplan suggests one vision like this, and although at one point you're sort of wishing he had did the Pico Iyer thing and simply gone to Toronto (where Indian and Chinese immigrant communities mix and don't), nevertheless at least there's some structural logic and logical structure to the over-arching argument that the Indian Ocean will be the fulcrum on which the world turns in 2050.

there's a good amount of material here. Burma/Myanmar at time of writing still under a military junta, might be the source of a trade highway/rail link with landlocked SW China. Sri Lanka with the just-ending Sinhalese/Tamil conflict presents the not totally unique geopolitical situation of all major world powers supporting one side (the examples from history also resulted in fairly quick resolutions). and then Kenya / Zanzibar isn't totally out of the picture, although Kaplan misses the opportunity to speculate if Australian technology and military resources will have major impact on the evolving eastern end. maybe it's just a level of complexity too far.

in any case, not to miss the forest for the trees, Kaplan--who has military and corporate experience and who has written quite an impressive output of strikingly readable geopolitical nonfiction, clearly hits the mark. he's experienced; he's linguistically capable; he's prolific. how can you go wrong? 4/5
Like Reblog Comment
review 2013-08-31 00:00
An Empire Wilderness: Travels into America's Future
An Empire Wilderness: Travels into America's Future - Robert D. Kaplan [★★★★☆-4/5]

If all of our human behavior could be explained through simple logic, probably everything would be tremendously easier. Mass transit, for one, would be a lot better, and with logical, rational food-distribution, we'd have feeding troughs running into inner cities. Fresh vegetables! Plenty of fruits! Less red meat!

Unfortunately, we're quite the illogical species. It means more Big Macs and more Whoppers. It means the disorderly / anarchistic / world-leading USA.

The story of how I got this book might be an illustration of the limits of human logic. I was at the used bookstore--the expensive one-- and considering putting down $5 for two or three different possibilities (vaguely remember one being a famous military sci fi work; another being something guaranteed to be fair--not poor and not good, but at $5 for a book, who's to say...). Then I saw AN EMPIRE WILDERNESS. For some reason, most likely because I've heavily discussed [a:Victor Davis Hanson|15262|Victor Davis Hanson|http://d202m5krfqbpi5.cloudfront.net/authors/1227566672p2/15262.jpg], I kept confusing the author. The little data storage point in my head said-- keen Republican, great writer, definite value. The bookstore wanted over $9 for this book that new retails for $14. Ouch. But the counter-thought kept intruding: hey, how much is just food for a day. How much versus the learning, the life-time ownership, the guaranteed (thanks to goodreads and all this review writing which allows for better scientific bookselection) Good Read.

So I bought in. It wasn't until I finished, that I realized Kaplan is the guy who fought in wars, killed 10 people, laid with 1000 teenage Thai hookers. His jaded, jaded voice is the super-annuated and super-knowledgeable analysis of things beyond explanation. He embedded with mujahideen in SOLDIERS OF GOD. He predicted THE COMING ANARCHY. He visited THE IMPERIAL GRUNTS. He went to THE ENDS OF THE EARTH. All 4s or 5s.

Maybe I was a trifle generous with COMING ANARCHY? And perhaps the argument could be made this is a 3.7 rather than a 4.0? But goodreads.com doesn't permit decimal or half-star ratings... and 3.7 probably rounds up to 4.0 rather than 3.5 in any case. Maybe I'd push for 3.8 in any case. In fact, why not, call it a 3.9

There are heaps of matters to discuss about Kaplan, most complicatedly being his very slight centre-right political views, his compliments about business, his elitism. Yet, in contrast to the definite-right stance I was expecting, there were moments of sympathy for hard-knocked Latinos and some of Kaplan's vision of a patchwork American West don't seem entirely negative.

plusses: in truth, it's hard to write about 'continental us;'-- most stories are in san francisco or new york; Kaplan is very skilled and very fluent;

minuses: touch of militarism? elitism?

overall, I'm still a little miffed at myself that I laid out 9 sheets for this, but, then, there's no way i'm ever selling it from my bookshelf. and the really great writers who produce half a dozen great non-fiction books are few few few and far between.

other bloggish notes: K-pop "Crayon Pop" is hot.
More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?