Wrong email address or username
Wrong email address or username
Incorrect verification code
back to top
Search tags: french-revolution
Load new posts () and activity
Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2018-02-05 05:29
The Lost Castle - Book Review

This story is spread out between three women - three women who are strong willed and unwilling to conform to the world around them. They fought, loved, and lived through some of the most troubling times in history. Aveline who has her life arranged for her by her family, but wants something different. Vi, who refuses to sit back and watch the world change around her. Ellie - who wants to unlock the secrets of her grandmothers life, but unwilling to budge on what she sets her mind to.
Ellie wants to know about her grandmothers past, and the secrets that are locked within the confines of her mind. Alzheimer's has ravaged the once clear and brilliant mind, leaving her millions of miles away - not always knowing her granddaughter, or where she is. The secrets that haunt her grandmother send Ellie off on a search for the answers - all the way to France.
Once there, she encounters Quinn, who holds almost as many secrets as her grandmother. As the stories flip between Aveline, Vi and Ellie, the past comes to life once more.

Aveline's story really spoke to me. The French Revolution was a dangerous time. But her concern was not the money or the social standing. She bucked convention and tried to help those who needed it the most. Instead of marrying the man that was set before her, she found love in one of the most unlikely places, with someone who was willing to look past the scars and accept her for who she was.
Vi was someone who wanted to do her part in the war, no matter the cost to her, because she believed in what they were fighting for.

I really enjoyed reading through this book. It held my attention throughout, and the flipping back and forth was not really hard to follow at all.

Like Reblog Comment
review 2017-11-24 05:30
Accessible adaptation of a classic tragedy
By Victor Hugo Manga Classics: Les Miserables Softcover - Victor Hugo

I quite liked this adaptation. I've always found Les Misérables to be pretty tough going, and the tragedy tended to overwhelm its beauty, so the stripped down format and much faster pacing of a graphic novel/manga version works much better for me. It still touches on the tragedy and fits in much of the complexity, while exposing the story structure more plainly. Also, it's pretty. Great way to introduce a classic in a more accessible way.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
text 2017-09-12 00:07
A Place of Greater Safety - Hilary Mantel

I am currently reading this. No one writes like Hilary Mantel. Events are very detailed and read slowly, and then a passage suddenly hits you like a freight train.


And this is a story of The French Revolution: war, blood, anarchy, science, philosophy, a doomed monarchy. What took me so long?


I used to read entire books within days. Now it takes me weeks. Maybe our ADHD social media-addled society is to blame? Or maybe it's just me. Enough with the excuses. 

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2016-11-09 02:37
The Black Count
The Black Count: Glory, Revolution, Betrayal, and the Real Count of Monte Cristo (Pulitzer Prize for Biography) - Tom Reiss

The name Alexandre Dumas is well known, but before the author and his playwright son was the General.  Tom Reiss brings the little known founder of the Dumas family into the spotlight in The Black Count, a born slave of noble blood turned Republican general in the service of France.  This giant of a man both of stature in the view of his novelist son cast a long shadow since his death.


Born in modern Haiti as a slave to a French nobleman father, Alexandre life suddenly changed when he joined on his father’s return journey to France to take is family title.  However after years of dealing with his father behavior, Alexandre joined the French army and with the coming of the French Revolution into Republican government.  His daring feats in the field and dedication to the ideals of republicanism sent him quickly up the chain of command to General.  Continuing his lead in front style, Alexandre was sent to lead men on every front that France needed him.  But it was his feats during the Italian campaign that truly brought him his greatest fame and yet began his long cold relationship with another General, Napoleon.  After more spectacular feats in Egypt and yet more conflict with Napoleon, Alexandre decided to return to France but was then captured in southern Italy only to emerge two year later into a new France in which his desire to service his country was rejected by its new leader.  Five years after his release, Alexandre died leaving his young son bereaved.  Yet, the legendary events of his life would inspire young Alexandre with a lot of material for his epic heroes including one Edmund Dantes.


The Black Count is a thrilling ride following a mixed raced former slave fighting for the republican ideals of his new homeland even as radical political events shift all around him, yet Alexandre Dumas quickly became a hero to the French until his capture and release into an entirely different France that didn’t appreciate him.  Tom Reiss brought to life of a little known French Republican general that had a long lasting impact on history outside of the military and political sphere to the enjoyment of readers around the world.

Like Reblog Comment
show activity (+)
review 2016-01-14 07:24
A prescient critique built on a shaky foundation
Reflections on the Revolution in France (Oxford World's Classics) - L.G. Mitchell,Edmund Burke

This is a work which I had long planned to read for two reasons. The first was its historic importance, as Burke's book has long been held up as an important early critique of the then-ongoing French Revolution. The other was its citation as an ur-text of modern Anglo-American conservatism, one of the sources that shaped the mold it would have for the next two centuries. Yet it wasn't until recently that a variety of factors combined to propel it to the top of my reading list.


What amazed me in reading it is how terrible it is. Burke's criticism of the French Revolution suffers from a glaring flaw from the outset, which is that he never acknowledges the reason why it took place. In his view, the changes France needed could have been addressed within the kingdom's existing institutions, with no need to demolish them as the revolutionaries were in the process of doing. What Burke fails to appreciate, however, is the degree to which the institutions themselves were part of the problem. After all, how could the French adopt a representative institution that existed exclusively in the mind of Edmund Burke?


Just as annoying is the English chauvinism of Burke's arguments. This is less problematic overall, though, especially when considering the context in which Burke was writing. As Leslie Mitchell pointed out in his excellent introduction to the edition that I read, one of Burke's driving concerns behind writing this book was that the revolution underway in France might spread across the Channel and break out in Britain as well. In this respect, emphasizing English superiority to his readers was not a bad strategy at all. Yet this belief in English superiority rested on an extremely slanted reading of English history, particularly the "Glorious Revolution" of 1688, which Burke holds up as a model. Setting aside the fact that the replacement of James II by William and Mary was in contrast to some of Burke's own arguments, the act itself was a military operation given a retroactive spin into a bloodless shrugging-off, one that Burke presents uncritically. Whether this reflects the contemporary interpretation of events passed a century ago or a deliberate misrepresentation is difficult to say, but either way the results are the same.


So if the book is as flawed as this, then how did it assume the outsized role it possesses today? The answer lies in his arguments, as beneath the flaws Burke can lay claim to a degree of prescience. Burke's concerns about the emergence of a strong man left me wondering what he would have thought about Napoleon Bonaparte. Would he have been a sign of the fever gripping France or a welcome return to the stability Burke sought throughout this book? Unfortunately, Burke's death in 1797, just as Napoleon was racking up victories in northern Italy, meant that he never had the opportunity to embrace or reject Bonapartism. Thus we will never know whether Burke regarded the Little Emperor's emergence as irrefutable evidence that he was correct or whether he would fall under Napoleon's spell as had so many others.

More posts
Your Dashboard view:
Need help?